Skip to main content
×
×
Home

EVALUATING LIFE OR DEATH PROSPECTS

  • Luc Bovens (a1) and Marc Fleurbaey (a2)
Abstract

We consider a special set of risky prospects in which the outcomes are either life or death (or, more generally, binary utilities). There are various alternatives to the utilitarian objective of minimizing the expected loss of lives in such prospects. We start off with the two-person case with independent risks and construct taxonomies of ex ante and ex post evaluations for such prospects. We examine the relationship between the ex ante and the ex post in this restrictive framework: There are more possibilities to respect ex ante and ex post objectives simultaneously than in the general framework, i.e. without the restriction to binary utilities (cf. Harsanyi's aggregation theorem). We extend our results to n persons and to dependent risks. We study optimal strategies for allocating risk reductions given different objectives. We place our results against the backdrop of various pro-poorly off (or prioritarian) value functions (Diamond 1967; Rabinowicz 2002; Fleurbaey 2010) for the evaluation of risky prospects.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Adler, M. 2011. Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adler, M.D. and Sanchirico, C.W. 2006. Inequality and uncertainty: theory and legal applications. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 155: 279377.
Atkinson, A.B. 1970. On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 244263.
Boadway, R. and Bruce, N. 1984. Welfare Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bossert, W. and Weymark, J.A. 2004. Utility in social choice. In Handbook of Utility Theory, vol. 2 (Extensions), eds. Barberà, S., Hammond, P.J. and Seidl, C., 10991177. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Broome, J. 1991. Weighing Goods. Oxford: Blackwell.
Diamond, P. 1967. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility: comment. Journal of Political Economy 75: 765766.
Fleurbaey, M. 2010. Assessing risky social situations. Journal of Political Economy 118: 649680.
Harsanyi, J. 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 3: 309321.
Keeney, R.L. 1980. Equity and public risk. Operations Research 28: 527534.
Kolm, S.C. 1968. The optimal production of social justice. In Public Economics, eds. Guitton, H. and Margolis, J., 145200. London: Macmillan.
Lucas, D.J. 1995. Default correlations and credit analysis. Journal of Fixed Income 4: 7687.
McCarthy, D. 2006. Utilitarianism and prioritarianism I. Economics and Philosophy 22: 335–63.
Parfit, D. 1991. Equality or priority? The Lindley Lecture. Lawrence: University of Kansas. Reprinted in The Ideal of Equality, ed. M. Clayton and A. Williams, 2002, 81–125. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Rabinowicz, W. 2002. Prioritarianism for prospects. Utilitas 14: 221.
Roberts, K.W.S. 1980. Interpersonal comparability and social choice theory. Review of Economic Studies 47: 421439.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 36 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 326 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.