Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Robin Harding (a1)


Intuitively it would seem that choice is important for democracy. Yet the empirical question, whether people actually do value facing distinct platforms when they vote, remains open. In this paper I seek to remedy that situation by systematically addressing the question using cross-national survey data. Specifically, I investigate whether satisfaction with democracy depends on the number and/or the substance of the choices that are available to people when they vote. The analysis offers strong support for the idea that what matters most to voters is the substance of electoral choices. Although the number of choices also matters, the significance of this factor is conditional on being able to vote for a party that represents one's views, or on voting for the winner.



Hide All
Anderson, C.J. and Guillory, C.A.. 1997. Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review 91: 6681.
Anderson, C.J. and Tverdova, Y.V. 2001. Winners, losers, and attitudes about government in contemporary democracies. International Political Science Review 22: 321338.
Anderson, C.J. and Tverdova, Y.V. 2003. Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47: 91109.
Barberà, S., Bossert, W. and Pattanaik, P.K. 2004. Ranking sets of objects. Handbook of Utility Theory 2: 893977.
Blais, A. and Gelineau, F. 2007. Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies 55: 425441.
Bossert, W., Pattanaik, P.K. and Xu, Y. 1994. Ranking opportunity sets: an axiomatic approach. Journal of Economic Theory 63: 326345.
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, The. 2007.
Jones, P. and Sugden, R. 1982. Evaluating choices. International Review of Law and Economics 2: 4765.
Karp, J.A., Banducci, S.A. and Bowler, S. 2003. To know it is to love it?: satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36: 271292.
Pattanaik, P. K. and Xu, Y. 1990. On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Recherches Economiques de Louvain 56: 383390.
Przeworski, A. 2003. Freedom to choose and democracy. Economics and Philosophy 19: 265279.
Sen, A. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. New York: North-Holland Amsterdam.
Sen, A. 1988. Freedom of choice: concept and content. European Economic Review 32: 269294.
Sen, A. 1991. Welfare, preference and freedom. Journal of Econometrics 50: 1529.
Wagner, A.F., Schneider, F. and Halla, M. 2009. The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe: a panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy 25: 3041.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO


  • Robin Harding (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.