Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T12:28:29.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GAME THEORY: A PRACTITIONER'S APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2010

Thomas C. Schelling
Thomas C. Schelling*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To a practitioner in the social sciences, game theory primarily helps to identify situations in which interdependent decisions are somehow problematic; solutions often require venturing into the social sciences. Game theory is usually about anticipating each other's choices; it can also cope with influencing other's choices. To a social scientist the great contribution of game theory is probably the payoff matrix, an accounting device comparable to the equals sign in algebra.

Information

Type
Essay
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 27 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allison, G. T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd edn, with Philip Zelikow, 1999. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Myerson, R. B. 1991. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. 1958. The strategy of conflict: prospectus for a reorientation of game theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution II, No. 3.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. 1984. Choice and Consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar