Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

In Defense of Explanatory Ecumenism

  • Frank Jackson (a1) and Philip Pettit (a1)
Abstract

Many of the things that we try to explain, in both our common sense and our scientific engagement with the world, are capable of being explained more or less finely: that is, with greater or lesser attention to the detail of the producing mechanism. A natural assumption, pervasive if not always explicit, is that other things being equal, the more finegrained an explanation, the better. Thus, Jon Elster, who also thinks there are instrumental reasons for wanting a more fine-grained explanation, assumes that in any case the mere fact of getting nearer the detail of production makes such an explanation intrinsically superior: “a more detailed explanation is also an end in itself” (Elster 1985, p. 5). Michael Taylor (1988, p. 96) agrees: “A good explanation should be, amongst other things, as fine-grained as possible.”

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Gregory Currie . 1984. “Individualism and Global Supervenience.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35:345–58.

Jon Elster . 1976. “A Note on Hysteresis in the Social Sciences.” Synthese 33:371–91.

Frank Jackson . 1990. “Program Explanation: A General Perspective.” Analysis 50:107–17.

Richard Miller . 1978. “Methodological Individualism and Social Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 45:387414.

David Papineau . 1978. For Science in the Social Sciences. London: Macmillan.

Phillip Pettit . 1990. “Virtus Normativa: Rational Choice Perspectives.” Ethics 100:725–55.

Alan Ryan . 1970. The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Macmillan.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 186 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.