Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Reisach, Ulrike 2016. The creation of meaning and critical ethical reflection in operational research. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Vol. 4, Issue. 1-2, p. 5.


    Tamate, Shintaro 2015. External Norms and Systematically Observed Norms. Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 66, Issue. 2, p. 247.


    de Melo-Martin, Inmaculada 2014. Ethics and Emerging Technologies.


    Rovane, Carol 2014. Group Agency and Individualism. Erkenntnis, Vol. 79, Issue. S9, p. 1663.


    Sikes, Michelle and Jarvie, Grant 2014. Women's running as freedom: development and choice. Sport in Society, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 507.


    Burgess, Alexis and Plunkett, David 2013. Conceptual Ethics II. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 8, Issue. 12, p. 1102.


    Smerilli, Alessandra 2012. We-thinking and vacillation between frames: filling a gap in Bacharach’s theory. Theory and Decision, Vol. 73, Issue. 4, p. 539.


    Sugden, Robert 2012. MUST GROUP AGENTS BE RATIONAL? LIST AND PETTIT'S THEORY OF JUDGEMENT AGGREGATION AND GROUP AGENCY. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 28, Issue. 02, p. 265.


    Baker, Jennifer A. 2009. Virtue and Behavior. Review of Social Economy, Vol. 67, Issue. 1, p. 3.


    Lutz, Mark A. 2008. The ‘Dismal Science’ – Still? Economics and Human Flourishing. Review of Political Economy, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 163.


    Pauer‐Studer, Herlinde 2006. Identity, commitment and morality. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 349.


    Tsakalotos, Euclid 2004. Homo Economicus, Political Economy and Socialism. Science & Society, Vol. 68, Issue. 2, p. 137.


    Schmid, Hans Bernhard 2003. Rationality-in-Relations. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 62, Issue. 1, p. 67.


    Davis, John B. 2002. The Emperor's Clothes. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 141.


    ×

Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 2 Unstrapping the straitjacket of ‘preference’: a comment on Amartya Sen's contributions to philosophy and economics

  • Elizabeth Anderson (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266267101000128
  • Published online: 01 April 2001
Abstract

The concept of preference dominates economic theory today. It performs a triple duty for economists, grounding their theories of individual behavior, welfare, and rationality. Microeconomic theory assumes that individuals act so as to maximize their utility – that is, to maximize the degree to which their preferences are satisfied. Welfare economics defines individual welfare in terms of preference satisfaction or utility, and social welfare as a function of individual preferences. Finally, economists assume that the rational act is the act that maximally satisfies an individual's preferences. The habit of framing problems in terms of the concept of preference is now so entrenched that economists rarely entertain alternatives.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×