Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 22
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bissonnette, Jean François 2016. From the moral to the neural: brain scans, decision-making, and the problematization of economic (ir)rationality. Journal of Cultural Economy, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 364.

    Davis, John B. 2016. Economics, Neuroeconomics, and the Problem of Identity. Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 136, Issue. 1, p. 15.

    Fumagalli, Roberto 2016. Choice models and realistic ontologies: three challenges to neuro-psychological modellers. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 145.

    Fumagalli, Roberto 2016. Five theses on neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 77.

    Kuorikoski, Jaakko and Marchionni, Caterina 2016. Triangulation across the lab, the scanner and the field: the case of social preferences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science,

    Nathan, Marco J. and Del Pinal, Guillermo 2016. Mapping the mind: bridge laws and the psycho-neural interface. Synthese, Vol. 193, Issue. 2, p. 637.

    Colombo, Matteo 2015. For a Few Neurons More: Tractability and Neurally Informed Economic Modelling. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 66, Issue. 4, p. 713.

    Melrose, A. James Hsu, Eustace and Monterosso, John 2015. The Wiley Handbook on the Cognitive Neuroscience of Addiction.

    Verweij, Marco Senior, Timothy J. Domínguez D., Juan F. and Turner, Robert 2015. Emotion, rationality, and decision-making: how to link affective and social neuroscience with social theory. Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 9,

    2015. Behavioral Computational Social Science.

    Foxall, Gordon R. 2014. The marketing firm and consumer choice: implications of bilateral contingency for levels of analysis in organizational neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8,

    Del Pinal, Guillermo and Nathan, Marco J. 2013. There and up again: On the uses and misuses of neuroimaging in psychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 233.

    Fumagalli, Roberto 2013. THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR TRUE UTILITY. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 29, Issue. 03, p. 325.

    Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten 2012. Institutions, distributed cognition and agency: rule-following as performative action. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 21.

    Ross, Don 2012. Book Review. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 248.

    Fumagalli, Roberto 2011. On the neural enrichment of economic models: tractability, trade-offs and multiple levels of description. Biology & Philosophy, Vol. 26, Issue. 5, p. 617.

    Heukelom, Floris 2011. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology.

    Ross, Don 2011. Estranged parents and a schizophrenic child: choice in economics, psychology and neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 217.

    Vromen, Jack 2011. Neuroeconomics: two camps gradually converging: what can economics gain from it?. International Review of Economics, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 267.

    Davis, John B. 2010. Neuroeconomics: Constructing identity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 76, Issue. 3, p. 574.



  • Don Ross (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 November 2008

I distinguish between two styles of research that are both called “neuroeconomics”. Neurocellular economics (NE) uses the modelling techniques and mathematics of economics – constrained maximization and equilibrium analysis – to model relatively encapsulated functional parts of brains. This approach rests upon the fact that brains are, like markets, massively distributed information-processing networks over which executive systems can exert only limited and imperfect governance. Harrison's (2008) deepest criticisms of neuroeconomics do not apply to NE. However, the more famous style of neuroeconomics is behavioural economics in the scanner. This is often motivated by complaints about conventional economics frequently heard from behavioural economists. It attempts to use neuroimaging data to justify arguments for replacing standard aspects of microeconomic theory by facts and conjectures about human psychology. Harrison's grounds for unease about neuroeconomics apply to most BES, or at least to its explicit methodology. This methodology is naively reductionist and illegitimately assumes that economics should not do what all successful science does, namely, model abstract aspects of its target phenomena instead of would-be complete and fully ecologically situated facsimiles of them.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. Camerer , G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec . 2005. Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature 43: 964.

A. Caplin and M. Dean . 2007. The neuroeconomic theory of learning. American Economic Review 97: 148–52.

C. Gallistel and J. Gibbon . 2000. Time, rate and conditioning. Psychological Review 107: 289344.

P. Glimcher , J. Kable and K. Louie . 2007. Neuroeconomic studies of impulsivity: now or just as soon as possible? American Economic Review 97: 142–7.

B. Knutson , S. Rick , G. E. Wimmer , D. Prelec and G. Loewenstein . 2007. Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron 53: 147–56.

S. McClure , D. Laibson , G. Loewenstein and J. Cohen . 2004. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306: 503–7.

R. Montague and G. Berns . 2002. Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron 36: 265–84.

M. Platt and P. Glimcher . 1999. Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature 400: 233–8.

D. Ross 2005. Economic theory and cognitive science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

D. Satz and J. Ferejohn . 1994. Rational choice and social theory. Journal of Philosophy 91: 7187.

W. Schultz , P. Dayan and P. R. Montague . 1997. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275: 1593–9.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *