Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T18:32:48.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where Economics Went Wrong: Chicago’s Abandonment of Classical Liberalism, David Colander and Craig Freedman. Princeton University Press, 2019, xii + 267 pages

Review products

Where Economics Went Wrong: Chicago’s Abandonment of Classical Liberalism, David Colander and Craig Freedman. Princeton University Press, 2019, xii + 267 pages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2019

Ross B. Emmett Open the ORCID record for Ross B. Emmett [Opens in a new window]
Ross B. Emmett*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
*
ross.emmett@asu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 312 - 318
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colander, D. 1992. The lost art of economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(3), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, D and Su, H-C. 2018. How Economics Should Be Done: Essays on the Art and Craft of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, C. 2008. Chicago Fundamentalism: Ideology and Methodology in Economics. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1953. The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in Positive Economics, 3–43. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, D.A. 2018. The midway and beyond: recent work on economics at Chicago. History of Political Economy 50(4), 735–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J.M. 1930. Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In Essays in Persuasion, IX: 321–332. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knight, F.H. 1951. The role of principles in economics and politics. American Economic Review 41(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D.N. 1983. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature 21(2), 481–517.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.S. and Rutherford, M. 1998. American economics: the character of the transformation. History of Political Economy 30(Supplement), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G.J. and Becker, G.S. 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67(2), 76–90.Google Scholar