Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 18
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Knight, Daniel Martyn 2015. Opportunism and Diversification: Entrepreneurship and Livelihood Strategies in Uncertain Times. Ethnos, Vol. 80, Issue. 1, p. 117.


    Mabsout, Ramzi 2015. Mindful capability. Ecological Economics, Vol. 112, p. 86.


    Räsänen, Petri 2015. Normative foundations of competitive markets and their relevance to democracy. SATS, Vol. 16, Issue. 2,


    Gilbert, Margaret 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.


    Davis, John B. 2012. Philosophy of Economics.


    Hourdequin, Marion 2012. Empathy, Shared Intentionality, and Motivation by Moral Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 403.


    Giovanola, Benedetta 2011. Humanistic Ethics in the Age of Globality.


    van Hoorn, André Mabsout, Ramzi and Sent, Esther-Mirjam 2010. Happiness and capability: Introduction to the symposium. The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 39, Issue. 3, p. 339.


    Zouboulakis, Michel 2010. Trustworthiness as a Moral Determinant of Economic Activity: Lessons from the Classics. Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 39, Issue. 3, p. 209.


    Giovanola, Benedetta 2009. Re-Thinking the Anthropological and Ethical Foundation of Economics and Business: Human Richness and Capabilities Enhancement. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88, Issue. 3, p. 431.


    Roy, Olivier 2009. Intentions and interactive transformations of decision problems. Synthese, Vol. 169, Issue. 2, p. 335.


    Lee, Ian B. 2008. Implications of Sen’s Concept of Commitment for the Economic Understanding of the Corporation. The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 21, Issue. 01, p. 97.


    Vanberg, Viktor J. 2008. On the Economics of Moral Preferences. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 67, Issue. 4, p. 605.


    Gasper, Des 2007. Adding links, adding persons, and adding structures: Using Sen's frameworks. Feminist Economics, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 67.


    Richardson, Jeff and McKie, John 2007. Economic evaluation of services for a National Health Scheme: The case for a fairness-based framework. Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 785.


    Pauer‐Studer, Herlinde 2006. Identity, commitment and morality. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 349.


    Sagoff, Mark 2006. An aggregate measure of what? A reply to Zerbe, Bauman, and Finkle. Ecological Economics, Vol. 60, Issue. 1, p. 9.


    Qizilbash, Mozaffar 2005. SEN ON FREEDOM AND GENDER JUSTICE. Feminist Economics, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 151.


    ×

WHY EXACTLY IS COMMITMENT IMPORTANT FOR RATIONALITY?

  • AMARTYA SEN (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266267104000355
  • Published online: 01 April 2005
Abstract

Gary Becker and others have done important work to broaden the content of self interest, but have not departed from seeing rationality in terms of the exclusive pursuit of self-interest. One reason why committed behavior is important is that a person can have good reason to pursue objectives other than self interest maximization (no matter how broadly it is construed). Indeed, one can also follow rules of behavior that go beyond the pursuit of one's own goals, even if the goals include non-self-interested concerns. By living in a society, one develops possible reasons for considering other people's goals as well, which takes one beyond an exclusive concentration on one's own goals, not to mention the single-minded pursuit of one's own self interest. The recognition of other people's goals may be a part of rational thought. If rational behavior may depart from the relentless pursuit of one's own goals, commitment has to be important in a theory of rationality. Furthermore, seeing the role of commitment in human behavior can have explanatory importance in allowing us to understand behavior patterns that are hard to fit into the narrow format of contemporary rational choice theory. Commitment is, thus, important both for practical reason and for causal explanation.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
Paper presented at a Workshop on Rationality and Commitment at the University of St. Gallen, May 13–15, 2004.
Footnotes
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×