Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T01:58:50.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A MONOGRAPHIC REVISION OF THE GENUS PODOCARPUS (PODOCARPACEAE): I. HISTORICAL REVIEW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

R. R. Mill
R. R. Mill*
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK. E-mail: r.mill@rbge.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

The taxonomic history of the genus Podocarpus (Podocarpaceae) is reviewed as the first part of a revision of the genus. The major taxonomic and other works relating to the genus published during nine time periods (before 1800, 1800–1850, 1851–1875, 1876–1900, 1901–1926, 1927–1947, 1948–1967, 1968–1987 and 1988–present) are briefly but critically discussed. Three landmark works are those by Pilger (1903), Buchholz and Gray (between 1948 and 1962) and de Laubenfels (1985). The paper ends with an outline plan of the revision of the genus to which the paper forms an introduction.

Keywords

ClassificationhistoryPodocarpaceaePodocarpussectionstaxonomy
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , November 2014 , pp. 309 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdillahi, H. S., Stafford, G. I., Finnie, J. F. & Van Staden, J. (2010). Ethnobotany, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Podocarpus sensu latissimo (s.l.). S. African J. Bot. 76: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abubakirov, N. K. (1982). Ecdysteroids of flowering plants (Angiospermae). Chem. Nat. Compounds 17: 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, R. S. (1950). Podocarpaceae. In: Adamson, R. S. & Salter, T. M., Flora of the Cape Peninsula. Cape Town & Johannesburg: Juta & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Aiton, W. (1789). Hortus kewensis. London: George Nicol. 3 vols.Google Scholar
Akiyama, S. & Ohba, H. (2012). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Sweet and its related taxa (Podocarpaceae). Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. B, 38: 121–130.Google Scholar
Allan, H. H. (1961). Flora of New Zealand. Vol. 1. (Ed. 1). Wellington: R. E. Owen, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Allnutt, T., Courtis, J. R., Gardner, M. & Newton, A. C. (2001). Genetic variation in wild Chilean and cultivated British populations of Podocarpus salignus D. Don (Podocarpaceae). Edinburgh J. Bot. 58: 459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvin, K. L. & Boulter, M. C. (1974). A controlled method of comparative study for Taxodiaceous leaf cuticles. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 277–286 + 5 plates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Ø. M. (1989). Delphinidin-3-neohesperidoside and cyanidin-3-neohesperidoside from receptacles of Podocarpus species. Phytochemistry 28(2): 495–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. H. (1956). The Trees of New South Wales. Ed. 2. Sydney: Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Bailey, F. M. (1899). Contributions to the flora of Queensland. Queensland Agric. J. 5: 387–390.Google Scholar
Baillon, H. (1892). Histoire des Plantes. Monographie des Conifères, Gnétacées, Cycadacées, Alismacées, Triuridacées, Typhacées, Najadacées et Centrolépidacées. Paris: Librairie Hachette et Cie.Google Scholar
Baker, J. G. (1885). Further contributions to the flora of Madagascar – second and final part. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 21: 407–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrero, A. F., Quílez del Moral, J. F. & Herrador, M. M. (2003). Podolactones: A group of biologically active norditerpenoids. In: Atta-ur-Rahman, (ed.) Bioactive Natural Products. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 28: 453–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. R. & Cambie, R. C. (1967). Chemistry of the Podocarpaceae—XIII: Constituents of the heartwoods of Podocarpus nivalis Hook. and Podocarpus acutifolius Kirk. Phytochemistry 6: 883–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, E. M. (1987). Family 18. Podocarpaceae. In: Marchant, N. G., Wheeler, J. R., Rye, B. L., Bennett, E. M., Lander, N. S. & Macfarlane, T. D., Flora of the Perth Region, Part One: 58. [Perth]: Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Agriculture, Western Australia.Google Scholar
Bennett, G. (1832). Botany of New Zealand: being a Description of Trees, Plants, &c. indigenous to that country. London Med. Gaz. 9: 506–508.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. J. & Brown, R. (1838). Plantae javanicae rariores, descriptae iconibusque illustratae, quas in insula Java, annis 1802–1818, legit et investigavit Thomas Horsfield M. D., e siccis descriptiones et characteres plurimarum elaboravit Ioannes J. Bennett; observationes structuram et affinitates praesertim respicientes passim adjecit Robertus Brown. Londini: apud Gul. H. Allen, et socios; Lipsiae: apud Black, Armstrong et socios; Lugduni Batavorum: apud S. et I. Luchtmans; Parisiis; apud J. B. Baillière.Google Scholar
Bernard, C. (1904). Le bois centripète dans les feuilles de Conifères. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 17: 241–293.Google Scholar
Bernard, C. (1907). Le bois centripète dans les bractées et dans les écailles des Conifères. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 22: 211–244, f. 1–50.Google Scholar
Bertrand, C. E. (1874). Anatomie comparée des tiges et des feuilles chez les Gnétacées et les Conifères. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 5, 20: 5–153.Google Scholar
Biffin, E., Conran, J. G. & Lowe, A. J. (2011). Podocarp evolution: A molecular phylogenetic perspective. In: Turner, B. L. & Cernusak, L. A. (eds) Ecology of the Podocarpaceae in Tropical Forests, pp. 1–20. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, No. 95. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.Google Scholar
Biffin, E., Brodribb, T. J., Hill, R. S., Thomas, P. & Lowe, A. J. (2012). Leaf evolution in Southern Hemisphere conifers tracks the angiosperm ecological radiation. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 279: 341–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blume, C. L. (1827). Enumeratio plantarum Javae et insularum adjacentium minus cognitarum vel novarum ex herbariis Reinwardtii, Kuhlii, Hasseltii et Blumii. Leiden: J. W. van Leeuwen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, C. L. (1847). Rumphia sive commentationes botanicae … de plantae orientalis …. Leiden & Amsterdam. [4 vols, 1835–1849; Podocarpaceae all in 3, 1847.]Google Scholar
Bobrov, A. V. F. Ch. & Kostrikin, D. S. (1999). Systematic position of Microcachrys tetragona (Hook.) Hook. fil. (Podocarpaceae (Dumort.) Endl. s.l.) based on seed coat structure. 14 Symp. Biodiversität Evolutionsbiologie Jena 1999: 19.Google Scholar
Bobrov, A. V. & Melikian, A. P. (1998a). Spetsificheskie priznakh semennoj kozhur’ i vozmozhnost’ ikh ispol’ovaniya v sistematike semejstva Podocarpaceae Endlicher, 1847. Byull. Mosk. Obshch. Isp. Prir., Otd. Biol. 103(1): 56–62.Google Scholar
Bobrov, A. V. & Melikian, A. P. (1998b). Sistematicheskoe polozhenie roda Parasitaxus de Lauben. (Podocarpaceae s.l.) po dannym stroeniya semyan. Tez. Dokl. II(X) Svezda RBO. SPB. (Proc. II(X) Congr. Russ. Bot. Soc. St. Petersburg) 1: 12.Google Scholar
Boland, D. J., Brooker, M. I. H., Chippendale, G. M., Hall, N., Hyland, B. P. M., Johnston, R. D., Kleinig, D. A. & Turner, J. D. (1984). Forest Trees of Australia. Melbourne: Thomas Nelson Australia.Google Scholar
Boyle, P. & Doyle, J. (1953). Development in Podocarpus nivalis in relation to other podocarps. I. Gametophyte and fertilization. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. 26: 179–205.Google Scholar
Boyle, P. & Doyle, J. (1954). Development in Podocarpus nivalis in relation to other podocarps. II. Embryogeny in Eupodocarpus. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. 26: 289–312.Google Scholar
Brako, L. & Zarucchi, J. L. (1993). Catalogue of the flowering plants and gymnosperms of Peru. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 45. St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Braun, A. (1869). Ueber eine Missbildung von Podocarpus chinensis. Monatsber. Königl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1869: 238–266.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, F. von (1965). The indigenous trees of southern Africa. Pretoria: The Government Printer, for Department of Forestry.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, F. von (1974). Southern Cape forests and trees. Pretoria: The Government Printer.Google Scholar
Brizicky, G. K. (1969). Subgeneric and sectional names: their starting points and early sources. Taxon 18: 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brongniart, A. & Gris, A. (1866a). Sur quelques Conifères de la Nouvelle Calédonie. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 13: 422–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brongniart, A. & Gris, A. (1866b). Observations sur diverses plantes nouvelles ou peu connues de la Nouvelle Calédonie. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 5, 6: 238–266.Google Scholar
Brooks, F. T. & Stiles, W. (1910). The structure of Podocarpus spinulosus, (Smith) R.Br. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) o.s. 24: 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1814). General remarks, geographical and systematical, on the Botany of Terra Australis. Being Appendix III of Flinders, M., A Voyage to Terra Australis, vol. 2: 533–612. London. [Reprinted in Bennett, J. J. (ed.) The Miscellaneous Works of Robert Brown, vol. 1: 1–89. London: Robert Hardwicke for the Ray Society, 1866.]Google Scholar
Brownlie, G. (1953). Embryogeny of the New Zealand species of the genus Podocarpus section Eupodocarpus. Phytomorphology 3(3): 295–306.Google Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. (1919). Studies concerning the evolutionary status of polycotyledony. Amer. J. Bot. 6: 106–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. (1920). Embryo development and polyembryony in relation to the phylogeny of conifers. Amer. J. Bot. 7: 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. (1936). Embryogeny of species of Podocarpus of the subgenus Stachycarpus. Bot. Gaz. 98: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. (1941). Embryogeny of the Podocarpaceae. Bot. Gaz. 103: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. (1949). Additions to the coniferous flora of New Caledonia. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. (Paris) sér. 2, 21(2): 279–286.Google Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. & Gray, N. E. (1948a). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus I. The sections of the genus and their subdivisions with special reference to leaf anatomy. J. Arnold Arbor. 29: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. & Gray, N. E. (1948b). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus II. The American species of Podocarpus: section Stachycarpus. J. Arnold Arbor. 29: 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. & Gray, N. E. (1948c). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus IV. The American species of section Eupodocarpus, Subsections C and D. J. Arnold Arbor. 29: 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, J. T. & Gray, N. E. (1957). Podocarpaceae. In: Steyermark, J. A. et al., Flora of Venezuela. Fieldiana, Bot. 28: 759–772. Chicago: Chicago Natural History Museum.Google Scholar
Burgess, N., Hales, J. D., Underwood, E., Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Itoua, I., Schipper, J., Ricketts, T. & Newman, K. (2004). Terrestrial ecoregions of Africa and Madagascar: a conservation assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Burlingame, L. L. (1908). The staminate cone and male gametophyte of Podocarpus. Bot. Gaz. 46: 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambie, R. C. & Mander, L. N. (1962). Chemistry of the Podocarpaceae. VI. Constituents of the heartwood of Podocarpus totara G. Benn. Tetrahedron 18: 465–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambie, R. C., Simpson, W. R. J. & Colebrook, L. D. (1963). Chemistry of the Podocarpaceae—VII: Podototarin and the constituents of the heartwood of Podocarpus hallii Kirk. Tetrahedron 19: 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carabia, J. B. (1941). Contribuciones al estudio de la Flora Cubana: Gymnospermae. Caribbean Forester 2: 83–99.Google Scholar
Carrière, É.-A. (1855). Traité général des Conifères. Paris: chez l’auteur, rue de Buffon 53.Google Scholar
Carrière, É.-A. (1867). Traité général des Conifères. Nouvelle édition. Paris: chez l’auteur, rue de Buffon 53.Google Scholar
Catania, M. del Valle (‘2005’ recd. Aug. 2006). Micromicetes asociados con corteza y/o madera de Podocarpus parlatorei Pilg. en la Argentina. II. Ascomycotina. Lilloa 42: 15–26.Google Scholar
Catania, M. del Valle & Romero, A. I. (2001). Tripospora militaris sp. nov. from Argentina, with a key to the known species. Mycol. Res. 105: 1020–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catania, M. del Valle & Romero, A. I. (2005). Two new species of Camarops (Boliniaceae, Ascomycotina) and a key to Argentinean species. Sydowia 57: 3–18.Google Scholar
Catania, M. del Valle & Romero, A. I. (2006). Micromicetes asociados con corteza y/o madera de Podocarpus parlatorei Pilg. en la Argentina. III. Ascomycetes anamórficos. Lilloa 43: 29–43.Google Scholar
Catania, M. del Valle & Romero, A. I. (2008). Micromicetes asociados con corteza y/o madera de Podocarpus parlatorei Pilg. en la Argentina. IV. Ascomycetes. Lilloa 45(1–2): 3–22.Google Scholar
Catania, M. del V. & Romero, A. I. (2009). Micromicetes asociados con corteza y/o madera de Podocarpus parlatorei Pilg. en la Argentina. V. Ascomycota anamórficos. Lilloa 46(1–2): 43–51.Google Scholar
Catania, M. del V. & Romero, A. I. (2010a). Micromicetes asociados a la corteza y madera de Podocarpus parlatorei (Podocarpaceae) en la Argentina. VI. Ascomycota. Darwiniana 48(2): 123–140.Google Scholar
Catania, M. del V. & Romero, A. I. (2010b). Micromicetes asociados con corteza y/o madera de Podocarpus parlatorei en la Argentina. VII. Ascomycota, Hysteriales. Lilloa 47(1–2): 53–60.Google Scholar
Chang, C.-C. (1941). A new Podocarpus from Kwangsi. Sunyatsenia 6(1): 26–27 & pl. 6.Google Scholar
Cheng, W. C. & Fu, L. K. (1978). Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Vol. 7. Gymnospermae. Peking: Academiae Scientiarum Sinicae.Google Scholar
Chevalier, L. (1957). Les conifères actuellement connus en Nouvelle Calédonie. Études Mélanés. n.s. 8e/9e année, 10/11 (II(1)): 105–118.Google Scholar
Christenhusz, M. J. M., Reveal, J. L., Farjon, A., Gardner, M. F., Mill, R. R. & Chase, M. W. (2011). A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 19: 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, W. C. (1902). Notes on the gametophytes and embryo of Podocarpus. Bot. Gaz. 33: 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colenso, W. (1884). In Memoriam. An account of visits to, and crossing over, the Ruahine Mountain Range, Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand; and of the natural history of that region; performed in 1845–1847; cum multis aliis. Napier: Daily Telegraph Office.Google Scholar
Compton, R. H. (1922). A systematic account of the plants collected in New Caledonia and the Isle of Pines by Mr R. H. Compton, M.A., in 1914. – Part II. Gymnosperms and Cryptogams. By Prof. Compton and others. J. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. 45: 421–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conran, J. G., Wood, G. G., Martin, P. G., Dowd, J. M., Quinn, C. J., Gadek, P. A. & Price, R. A. (2000). Generic relationships within and between the Gymnosperm families Podocarpaceae and Phyllocladaceae based on an analysis of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Austral. J. Bot. 48: 715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtin, A. (1858). Die Familie der Coniferen. Eine systematisch geordnete Darstellung und Beschreibung aller zum Geschlechte der Tannen und Nadelhölzer und gehörigen Gewächse, nebst praktischen Anleitungen zu ihrer Vermehrung, Cultur und Verwendung. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covas, G. (1995). Podocarpaceae. Being: Flora Fanerogámica Argentina, Fasciculo 4: 1–14. Programa PROFLORA (CONICET).Google Scholar
Crowden, R. K. (1974). Cyanidin-3-neohesperidoside, a novel anthocyanin from Podocarpus lawrencii [sic]. Phytochemistry 13: 2877–2878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowden, R. K. & Grubb, M. J. (1971). Anthocyanins from five species of the Podocarpaceae. Phytochemistry 10: 2821–2822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, W. revised by Curtis, W. & Morris, D. (1975). The Student’s Flora of Tasmania. Part 1 ( second edition): Gymnospermae, Angiospermae (Ranunculaceae to Myrtaceae). Hobart: T. J. Hughes, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Davies, B. J., O’Brien, I. E. W. & Murray, B. G. (1997). Karyotypes, chromosome bands and genome size variation in New Zealand endemic gymnosperms. Pl. Syst. Evol. 208: 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boer, W. A. P. (1866). Specimen botanicum inaugurale de coniferis archipelagici indici. Traiecti ad Rhenum [Utrecht]: J. G. van Terveen & Fil.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1953). The external morphology of coniferous leaves. Phytomorphology 3: 1–20.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1960). Podocarpus lucienii, a new species from New Caledonia. Brittonia 12: 79–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1969). A revision of the Malesian and Pacific rainforest conifers, I. Podocarpaceae, in part. J. Arnold Arbor. 50: 274–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1972a). Deux nouveaux Podocarpus endemiques de Madagascar. Adansonia n.s. 11: 713–715.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1972b). Gymnospermes. 17e Famille. – Cycadacées. 18e Famille. – Podocarpacées. In: Leroy, J.-F. (ed.) Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1972c). Gymnospermes. In: Aubreville, A. & Leroy, J.-F. (eds) Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et Dépendances, 4. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1978a). The taxonomy of Philippine Coniferae and Taxaceae. Kalikasan 7(2): 117–152.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1978b). The genus Prumnopitys (Podocarpaceae) in Malesia. Blumea 24: 189–190.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1979 [‘1978’]). The Podocarpus species of Ambon (Podocarpaceae). Blumea 24: 495–497.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1980). The endemic species of Podocarpus in New Guinea. Blumea 26: 139–143.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1982). Podocarpaceae. In: Luces de Febres, Z. & Steyermark, J. A. (eds) Flora de Venezuela 11(2): 7–41. Caracas: Instituto Nacional de Parques, Dirección de Investigaciones Biológicas, Ediciones Fundación Educación Ambiental.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1984a). Un nuevo Podocarpus (Podocarpaceae) de la Española. Moscosoa 3: 149–150.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1984b). 294. Podocarpus L’Hérit. ex Persoon. In: Balgooy, M. M. J. (ed.) Pacific Plant Areas 4: 214, map p. 215. Leiden: Rijksherbarium.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1985). A taxonomic revision of the genus Podocarpus. Blumea 30: 251–278.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1987). Revision of the genus Nageia (Podocarpaceae). Blumea 32: 209–211.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1988). Coniferales. In: van Steenis, C. G. G. J. & De Wilde, W. J. J. O. (‘1986’), Flora Malesiana 10(3). Dordrecht, Boston & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1991a [‘1990’]). The Podocarpaceae of Costa Rica. Brenesia 33: 119–121.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1991b). Las Podocaráceas [sic] del Perú. Bol. Lima no. 73: 57–60.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1992a). Podocarpus acuminatus (Podocarpaceae), a new species from South America. Novon 2: 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1992b). Commentary: The organization of female fertile structures in conifers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153(4): vii–viii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (1994). Las Podocaráceas [sic] del Perú. Bol. Lima 16(91–96): 35–39.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (2003). A new species of Podocarpus from the maquis of New Caledonia. New Zealand J. Bot. 41: 715–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. (2005). Statut du Podocarpus de l’Ile des Pins (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Adansonia sér. 3, 27: 151–153.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. & Silba, J. (1988a). Notes on Asian-Pacific Podocarpaceae: 1. (Podocarpus). Phytologia 64: 290–292.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, D. J. & Silba, J. (1988b). Notes on Asian and trans-Pacific Podocarpaceae, II. Phytologia 65: 329–332.Google Scholar
del Fueyo, G. M. (1988). Anatomia y ontogenia foliar de Podocarpus parlatorei (Podocarpaceae). Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 25: 353–367.Google Scholar
del Fueyo, G. M. (1989). Anatomia de la madera de Podocarpus parlatorei (Podocarpaceae). Parodiana 5: 239–247.Google Scholar
del Fueyo, G. M. (1996). Microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis of the Argentinian species of Podocarpus (Podocarpaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 122: 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Fueyo, G. M. (1999). Cone and ovule development in the Podocarpus species from Argentina. Phytomorphology 49: 49–60.Google Scholar
Diaz-Vaz, J. E. (1986). Anatomia de madera de Podocarpus nubigena Lindl.; Cupressaceae. Bosque 7: 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, D. N. F. (1852). Synopsis plantarum seu enumeratio systematica plantarum plerumque adhoc cognitarum cum differentiis specificis et synonymis selectis ad modum Persoonii elaborata. Vol. 5. Weimar: Bernhard Friedrich Voigt.Google Scholar
Dinan, L. (2001). Phytoecdysteroids: biological aspects. Phytochemistry 57: 325–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinan, L. (2009). The Karlson Lecture. Phytoecdysteroids: what use are they? Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 72: 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinan, L., Harmatha, J., Volodin, V. & Lafont, R. (2009). Phytoecdysteroids: diversity, biosynthesis and distribution. In: Smagghe, G. (ed.) Ecdysone: Structures and Functions, pp. 3–45. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinerstein, E., Olson, D. M., Graham, D. J., Webster, A. L., Primm, S. A., Bookbinder, M. P. & Ledec, G. (1995). A conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, M. C. & van Staden, J. (1981). Germination and viability studies on the seeds of Podocarpus henkelii Stapf. S. African J. Sci. 77: 171–174.Google Scholar
Dodd, M. C., van Staden, J. & Smith, M. T. (1989a). Seed development in Podocarpus henkelii: an ultrastructural and biochemical study. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) n.s. 64: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, M. C., van Staden, J. & Smith, M. T. (1989b). Seed germination in Podocarpus henkelii: an ultrastructural and biochemical study. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) n.s. 64: 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doweld, A. (2001). Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum. Moscow: Geos.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. (1945). Developmental lines in pollination mechanisms in the Coniferales. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. 24: 43–62.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. (1954). Development in Podocarpus nivalis in relation to other podocarps. III. General conclusions. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. 26: 347–377.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. & Brennan, M. (1971a). Cleavage polyembryony in conifers and taxads – a survey. 1. Podocarps, taxads and taxodioids. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. ser. A, 4(6): 57–88.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. & Brennan, M. (1971b). Cleavage polyembryony in conifers and taxads – a survey. 2. Cupressaceae, Pinaceae, conclusions. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. ser. A, 4(10): 137–158.Google Scholar
Eagle, A. L. (2006). Complete Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand. Wellington: Te Papa Press. 2 vols. [Podocarpaceae pp. 2–29; Phyllocladaceae pp. 30–39.]Google Scholar
Eckenwalder, J. E. (2009). Conifers of the World: The Complete Reference. Portland, OR: Timber Press.Google Scholar
Endlicher, S. (1837). Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita. Vindobonae: F. Beck. [Published in 18 parts plus a Supplement, 1836–1841; Coniferae, pt. 4 pp. 258–264, publ. Oct. 1837; Suppl. 1 pp. 1361–1483 (includes Coniferae), 1841.]Google Scholar
Endlicher, S. (1847). Synopsis coniferarum. Sangalli: apud Scheitlin & Zollikofer.Google Scholar
Endlicher, S. (1848 [‘1847’]). Genera plantarum supplementum quartum. Vindobonae: F. Beck.Google Scholar
Engler, H. G. A. & Prantl, K. A. E. (1897). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 1 Aufläge, Nachtrage. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Enright, N. J. & Ogden, J. (1995). The Southern Conifers – a synthesis. In: Enright, N. J. & Hill, R. S. (eds) Ecology of the Southern Conifers, pp. 271–287. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Erdtman, G. (1957). Pollen and Spore Morphology / Plant Taxonomy. Gymnospermae, Pteridophyta, Bryophyta (illustrations). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Erdtman, G. (1965). Pollen and Spore Morphology / Plant Taxonomy. Gymnospermae, Bryophyta (text). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Fahrbach, S. E., Smagghe, G. & Velarde, R. A. (2012). Insect nuclear receptors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 57: 83–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farjon, A. (1998). World Checklist and Bibliography of Conifers. Ed. 1. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Farjon, A. (2001). World Checklist and Bibliography of Conifers. Ed. 2. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Farjon, A. (2010). A Handbook of the World’s Conifers. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farjon, A. & Filer, D. (2013). An Atlas of the World’s Conifers: An Analysis of their Distribution, Biogeography, Diversity and Conservation Status. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favre, E. (1865). Recherches sur la fleur femelle du Podocarpus sinensis. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 5, 3: 379–382.Google Scholar
Ferré, Y. de, Rouane, M.-L. & Woltz, P. (1975). Plantules des Podocarpacées. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 111: 303–318.Google Scholar
Ferré, Y. de, Rouane, M.-L. & Woltz, P. (1977). Systématique et anatomie comparée des feuilles de Taxaceae, Podocarpaceae, Cupressaceae de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Cah. Pacifique 20: 241–266. [Also reprinted with same pagination as Trav. Lab. Forest. Toulouse tome I vol. IX art. II.]Google Scholar
Florin, R. (1920). Über Cuticularstrukturen der Blätter bei einigen rezenten und fossilen Coniferen. Ark. Bot. 16, no. 6. 32 pp.Google Scholar
Florin, R. (1954). The female reproductive organs of Conifers and Taxads. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 29: 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florin, R. (1958). Notes on the systematics of the Podocarpaceae. Acta Horti Berg. 17(11): 403–411.Google Scholar
Florin, R. (1963). The distribution of conifer and taxad genera in time and space. Acta Horti Berg. 20(4): 121–312.Google Scholar
Foxworthy, F. W. (1907). Taxaceae (Dacrydium Soland, Podocarpus L’Hérit., Phyllocladus Rich.). Pp. 257–259 of Merrill, E. D., The flora of Mount Halcon, Mindoro. Philipp. J. Sci., C 2: 251–309.Google Scholar
Foxworthy, F. W. (1911). Philippine Gymnosperms. Philipp. J. Sci., C 6: 149–176.Google Scholar
Franchet, A. (1899). Plantarum sinensium. Ecloge tertia. J. Bot. (Morot) 1899: 261–266.Google Scholar
Fu Li-Guo, Li Yong & Mill, R. R. (1999). Podocarpaceae. In: Zheng-Yi, Wu & Raven, P. H. (eds) Flora of China 4: 78–84.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. (1788). De fructibus et seminibus plantarum. Stuttgart: author. Typis Academiae Carolinae. [3 vols, 1788–1791. Nageia in 1, 1788.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, M. N. & Horn, D. H. S. (1966). An insect-moulting hormone from a plant. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1966: 905–906.Google Scholar
Galbraith, M. N., Horn, D. H. S., Middleton, E. J. & Hackney, R. J. (1969). The structure of podecdysone B, a new phytoecdysone. Chem. Commun. 1969: 402–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaussen, H. (1973). Les Gymnospermes actuelles et fossiles. Fascicule XII. Les Podocarpines. Étude générale. Trav. Lab. Forest. Toulouse tome 2, vol. 1, fasc. XII. Toulouse: Faculté des Sciences. [2 chapters, of 109 & 39 pp. separately paginated.]Google Scholar
Gaussen, H. (1974). Les Gymnospermes actuelles et fossiles. Fascicule XIII. Les Podocarpines sauf les Podocarpus. Trav. Lab. Forest. Toulouse 2(1) Partie 2(3) fasc. XIII. Toulouse: Faculté des Sciences. 174 pp.Google Scholar
Gaussen, H. (1976). Les Gymnospermes actuelles et fossiles. Fascicule XIV. Genre Podocarpus. Conclusion des Podocarpines. Trav. Lab. Forest. Toulouse tome 2, vol. 1, fasc. XIV. Toulouse: Faculté des Sciences. 269 pp.Google Scholar
Gaussen, H. & Woltz, P. (1975). Anatomie foliaire de quelques Podocarpus malgaches de haute montagne. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 111: 319–321.Google Scholar
Geyler, H. T. (1867). Ueber den Gefässbündelverauf in den Laubblattregionen der Coniferen. Jahrb. Bot. 6: 55–208.Google Scholar
Gibbs, L. S. (1912). On the development of the female strobilus in Podocarpus. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) o.s. 26: 515–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, G. (1858). The Pinetum: being a synopsis of all the coniferous plants at present known, with descriptions, history, and synonymes, and comprising nearly one hundred new kinds. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Gordon, G. (1862). The Pinetum: being a synopsis of all the coniferous plants at present known, with descriptions, history and synonymes, and comprising nearly one hundred new kinds. Supplement. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Gordon, G. (1875). The Pinetum: being a synopsis of all the coniferous plants at present known, with descriptions, history, and synonymes, and a comprehensive systematic index. Ed. 2. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Graça Silva, M. da (1983). Flora de Moçambique. 1. Cycadaceae, 2. Podocarpaceae, 3. Cupressaceae. Lisboa: Instituto de Investigação cientifica tropical, Centro de Botanica.Google Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1953a). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus VII. The African species of Podocarpus section Afrocarpus. J. Arnold Arbor. 34: 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1953b). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus VIII. The African species of section Eupodocarpus, subsections A and E. J. Arnold Arbor. 34: 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1955). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus IX. The South Pacific species of section Eupodocarpus, subsection F. J. Arnold Arbor. 36: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1956). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus X. The South Pacific species of Section Eupodocarpus, subsection D. J. Arnold Arbor. 37: 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1958a). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus XI. The South Pacific species of Section Podocarpus, subsection B. J. Arnold Arbor. 39: 424–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1958b). Flora of Guatemala. Podocarpaceae. Fieldiana, Bot. 24(1): 20–23. Chicago: Chicago Natural History Museum.Google Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1959). Family Podocarpaceae. Genus Podocarpus. In: Yuncker, T. G., Plants of Tonga. Bernice P. Bishop Mus. Bull. 220: 46–48.Google Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1960). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus XII. Section Microcarpus. J. Arnold Arbor. 41: 36–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1962a). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus XIII. Section Polypodiopsis in the South Pacific. J. Arnold Arbor. 43: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. E. (1962b). The cultivated podocarps in the United States. Baileya 10: 56–61.Google Scholar
Gray, N. E. & Buchholz, J. T. (1948). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus III. The American species of Podocarpus: section Polypodiopsis. J. Arnold Arbor. 29: 117–122.Google Scholar
Gray, N. E. & Buchholz, J. T. (1951a). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus V. The South Pacific species of Podocarpus: section Stachycarpus. J. Arnold Arbor. 32: 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. E. & Buchholz, J. T. (1951b). A taxonomic revision of Podocarpus VI. The South Pacific species of Podocarpus: section Sundacarpus. J. Arnold Arbor. 32: 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greguss, P. (1951). Xylotomischer Bestimmungeschlüsselder Gattungen und Arten der Podocarpaceae. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 3(1): 53–149.Google Scholar
Greguss, P. (1955). Identification of living gymnosperms on the basis of xylotomy. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Greguss, P. (1957). Marginal ray parenchyma in Araucariaceae and in Podocarpaceae. Acta Biol. (Szeged)., nov. ser. 3(1/2): 15–17.Google Scholar
Greguss, P. (1972). Xylotomy of the living conifers. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. M. (1957). Foliar ontogeny of Podocarpus macrophyllus, with special reference to transfusion tissue. Amer. J. Bot. 44: 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisebach, A. H. R. (1862a). Plantae wrightianae, e Cuba orientali. Preprints from [part 1] Mem. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. ser. 2, 8: 153–192 (1861); [part 2] op. cit. 8: 503–536 (1863). [Published in two parts, 1860–1862; Podocarpus in part 2, 1862.]Google Scholar
Grisebach, A. H. R. (1862b). Flora of the British West Indies. Vol. 5. London: L. Reeve & Co.Google Scholar
Grisebach, A. H. R. (1866). Catalogus plantarum cubensium exhibens collectionem Wrightianam aliasque minores ex insula Cuba missas. Lipsiae: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Hair, J. B. (1963). Cytogeographical relationships of the Southern podocarps. In: Gressitt, J. L. (ed.) Pacific Basin Biogeography – Antarctica, pp. 401–414. Being 10th Pacific Science Congress (Hawaii, Honolulu, 21 August – 6 September 1961). Honolulu, Hawaii: Bishop Museum Press.Google Scholar
Hair, J. B. (1966). Biosystematics of the New Zealand flora, 1945–1964. New Zealand J. Bot. 4: 559–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J. B. & Beuzenberg, E. J. (1958). Chromosomal evolution in the Podocarpaceae. Nature 181: 1584–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hance, H. F. (1883). Spicilegia florae sinensis; Diagnoses of new and habitats of rare or hitherto unrecorded Chinese plants. [XIII.] J. Bot. 21: 355–359.Google Scholar
Harden, G. J. (1990). Flora of New South Wales. Vol. 1. Sydney: New South Wales University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, J. A. (1987). A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. J. Arnold Arbor. 68: 269–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hembree, J. A., Ching-Jer Chang, , McLaughlin, J. L., Cassady, J. M., Watts, D. J., Wenkert, E., Fonseca, S. F. & Paiva Campello, J. de (1979). The cytotoxic norditerpene dilactones of Podocarpus milanjianus and Podocarpus sellowii. Phytochemistry 18: 1691–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hembree, J. A., Chang, C-J., McLaughlin, J. L. & Cassady, J. M. (1980). Milanjilactones A and B, two novel cytotoxic norditerpene dilactones from Podocarpus milanjianus Rendle. Experientia 36: 28–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsley, W. B. (1885). New Chinese Plants. J. Bot. 23: 286–287.Google Scholar
Hemsley, W. B. (1896). Decades Kewenses Plantarum Novarum in Herbario Horti Regii Conservatarum. Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1896 [10], no. 110: 36–42.Google Scholar
Henkel, J. B. & Hochstetter, W. (1865). Synopsis der Nadelhölzer, deren charakteristischen Merkmale nebst Andeutungen über ihre Cultur und Ausdauer in Deutschlands Klima. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiêp, N. T. & Vidal, J. E. (1996). Flore du Cambodge, du Laos et du Vietnam: 28. Gymnospermae: Cycadaceae, Pinaceae, Taxodiaceae, Cupressaceae, Podocarpaceae, Cephalotaxaceae, Taxodiaceae, Gnetaceae. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
Hill, K. D. (1998). Podocarpaceae. In: McCarthy, P. M. (ed.) Flora of Australia 48: 545–562. Collingwood, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Hill, R. S. & Brodribb, T. J. (1999). Southern conifers in time and space. Austral. J. Bot. 47: 639–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, T. G. & de Fraine, E. (1908). On the seedling structure of Gymnosperms. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) o.s. 22: 689–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hizume, M., Shiraishi, H. & Tanaka, A. (1988). A cytological study of Podocarpus macrophyllus with special reference to sex chromosomes. Jap. J. Genet. 63: 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, F.-C., Chiu, N.-Y. & Cheng, C.-C. (1983). [Studies on leaf anatomy of the family Podocarpaceae in Taiwan and South-East Asia.] Annu. J. Taiwan Mus. 26: 101–127. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
Hooker, J. D. (1845). On the HUON PINE, and on MICROCACHRYS, a new genus of Coniferae from Tasmania; together with remarks upon the geographical distribution of that Order in the Southern Hemisphere. London J. Bot. 4: 137–157 & pl. VI.Google Scholar
Hooker, J. D. (1853). The botany of the antarctic voyage of H. M. discovery ships Erebus and Terror in the years 1839–43 under the command of Captain James Clark Ross, Kt., R. N., F. R. S. etc. Vol. 2. Flora Novae Zelandiae. Part I. Flowering plants. London: Reeve Bros.Google Scholar
Hooker, J. D. (1854). On some remarkable spherical exostoses developed on the roots of various species of Coniferae. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 2: 335*–336*.Google Scholar
Hooker, J. D. (1857). The botany of the antarctic voyage of H. M. discovery ships Erebus and Terror in the years 1839–43 under the command of Captain James Clark Ross, Kt., R. N., F. R. S. etc. Vol. 3. Flora Tasmaniae. London: L. Reeve & Co.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1842a). On a new species of Thuja and on Podocarpus Totara of New Zealand. London J. Bot. 1: 570–575.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1842b). Figures, with brief descriptions, of three species of Podocarpus. London J. Bot. 1: 656–659.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843a). Podocarpus ferruginea, Don. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 6: t. 542.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843b). Podocarpus spicata, Br. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 6: t. 543.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843c). Podocarpus? biformis. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 6: t. 544.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843d). Podocarpus? Dieffenbachii. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 6: t. 547.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843e). Dacrydium Colensoi. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 6: t. 548.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843f). Phyllocladus trichomanoides. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 6: t. 549, 550, 551.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843g). Arthrotaxis tetragona, Hook. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 6: t. 560.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843h). Podocarpus nivalis, Hook. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 6: t. 582.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1843i). Brief descriptions, with figures, of JUNIPERUS BERMUDIANA, the Pencil-Cedar Tree; and of the DACRYDIUM ELATUM, Wall.. – by W. J. H. (Tabs. I, II). London J. Bot. 2: 141–145.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1844). Podocarpus Purdieana Hook. Hooker’s Icon. Pl. 7: t. 624.Google Scholar
Hoopes, J. (1868). The Book of Evergreens. A Practical Treatise on the Coniferae, or Cone-bearing Plants. New York: Orange Judd & Company.Google Scholar
Horaninow, P. (1847). Characteres essentiales familiarum ac tribuum regni vegetabilis et amphorganici ad leges tetractydis naturae conscripti accedit enumeratio generum magis notorum et organographiae supplementum. Petropoli: Typis K. Wienöberianis.Google Scholar
Hu, S. Y. (1964). Notes on the Flora of China IV. Taiwania 10: 13–62.Google Scholar
Humboldt, F. W. H. A. von, Bonpland, A. J. & Kunth, C. S. (1817). Nova genera et species plantarum quas in peregrinatione orbis novi collegerunt, descripserunt, partim adumbraverunt Amat. Bonpland et Alex. de Humboldt. Ex schedis autographis Amati Bonplandi in ordinem digesset Carol Sigismund Kunth. Lutetiae Parisiorum: Sumptibus librariae graeco-latini-germanicae. Facsimile ed. of quarto ed.: Weinheim: J. Cramer 1963. [Publ. 1815–1825; Podocarpus in 2, 1817.]Google Scholar
Imai, S., Hori, M., Fujioka, S., Murata, E., Goto, M. & Nakanishi, K. (1968a). Isolation of four new phytoecdysones, makisterone A, B, C, D, and the structure of makisterone A, a C28 steroid. Tetrahedron Lett. 36: 3883–3886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, S., Hori, M., Fujioka, S., Murata, E., Sasakawa, Y. & Nakanishi, K. (1968b). The structures of three additional phytoecdysones from Podocarpus macrophyllus, makisterone B, C and D. Tetrahedron Lett. 36: 3887–3890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, S., Kodama, M., Sunagawa, M., Takahashi, T., Imamura, H. & Honda, O. (1968). Structure of inumakilactone a, a bisnorditerpenoid. Tetrahedron Lett. 9: 2065–2070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffré, T., Munzinger, J. & Lowry, P. P. II (2010). Threats to the conifer species found on New Caledonia’s ultramafic massifs and proposals for urgently needed measures to improve their protection. Biodivers. Conserv. 19: 1485–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, K. K. (1978 [‘1977’]). Morphology of female strobilus in Podocarpus neriifolius. Phytomorphology 27(3): 215–233.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, E. C. & Chrysler, M. A. (1907). The microgametophyte of the Podocarpineae. Amer. Nat. 41: 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. (1978). Aspects of chromosome evolution in higher plants. Advances Bot. Res. 6: 119–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. (1998). Robertsonian fusion and centric fission in karyotype evolution of higher plants. Bot. Rev. 64: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaeiser, M. (1954). Microstructure of wood of Podocarpus. Phytomorphology 4: 39–47.Google Scholar
Kaempfer, E. (1712). Amoenitatum exoticarum politico-physico-medicarum fasciculi V. Lemgoviae: Henricis Wilhelmi Meyeri.Google Scholar
Karsten, H. (1849). Die Vegetationsorgane der Palmen, eine vergleichend- anatomisch- physiologische Untersuchung. Abh. Königl. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1847: 73–236.Google Scholar
Kausik, S. B. (1975). The leaf structure in Podocarpus brevifolius (Stapf) Foxw. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B 81(5): 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelch, D. G. (1997). The phylogeny of the Podocarpaceae based on morphological evidence. Syst. Bot. 22: 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelch, D. G. (1998). Phylogeny of Podocarpaceae: comparison of evidence from morphology and 18S rDNA. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 986–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keng, H. (1973). On the family Phyllocladaceae. Taiwania 18(2): 142–145.Google Scholar
Kirk, T. (1884). Description of a new Pine. Trans. & Proc. New Zealand Inst. 16: 370–371.Google Scholar
Kirk, T. (1889). The forest flora of New Zealand. Wellington: George Didsbury, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kirwan, C. de (1868). Les conifères indigènes et exotiques. Traité pratique des arbres verts ou résineux. Paris: J. Rothschild.Google Scholar
Knopf, P., Schulz, C., Little, D. P., Stützel, T. & Stevenson, D. W. (2012). Relationships within Podocarpaceae based on DNA sequence, anatomical, morphological, and biogeographical data. Cladistics 28: 271–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koorders, S. H. & Valeton, T. (1904). Bijdrage No. 10 tot de kennis der boomsoorten op Java. Meded. Lands. Plantentuin 68. Batavia: G. Kolff & Co.Google Scholar
Koorders, S. H. & Valeton, T. (1915). Atlas der Baumarten von Java. Leiden: Fa. P. W. M. Trap.Google Scholar
Kubo, I. (2006). New concept to search for alternate insect control agents from plants. Advances Phytomedicine 3: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar Roy, S., Qasim, M. A., Kamil, M. & Ilyas, M. (1987). Biflavones from the genus Podocarpus. Phytochemistry 26: 1985–1987.Google Scholar
Kuntze, O. (1891). Revisio generum plantarum vascularium omnium atque cellularium multarum secundum leges nomenclaturae internationales cum enumeratione plantarum exoticarum in itinere mundi collectarum. Pars II [pp. 377–1011]. Leipzig: Arthur Felix; Milano: U. Hoepli; London: Dulau & Co.; New-York; Gust. E. Stechert; Paris: Charles Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Labillardière, J. J. H. de (1806). Novae Hollandiae plantarum specimen. 2 vols. Parisiis: Dominae Huzard. [Podocarpus Labill., 2: 71.]Google Scholar
Lafont, R. & Dinan, L. (2009). Innovative and future applications for ecdysteroids. In: Smagghe, G. (ed.) Ecdysone: Structures and Functions, pp. 551–578. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, R., Harmatha, J., Marion-Poll, F., Dinan, L. & Wilson, I. D. (2002 onwards, continuously updated). Ecdybase. The Ecdysone Handbook. Ed. 3.www.ecdybase.org accessed 5 November 2012.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. A. P. M. de (1789). Encyclopédie méthodique. Botanique…. Paris: Pancoucke, & Liège: Plomteux.Google Scholar
Lambert, A. B. (1824). A description of the genus Pinus. Ed. 1, vol. 2 [by D. Don]. London: J. White.Google Scholar
Lambert, A. B. (1832). A description of the genus Pinus. [The ‘Editio minor’ or ed. 3]. London: Messrs Weddell.Google Scholar
Laurent, L. (1915 [‘1914’]). Les podocarps de Madagascar. Ann. Fac. Sci. Marseille 23: 52–66.Google Scholar
Lavalle, M. del C. (2000). Caracteres de celulas oclusivas en estomas de especies argentinas y americanas de Podocarpus L. (Podocarpaceae). Revista Mus. La Plata (Nueva Serie) 14(112): 483–487.Google Scholar
Leistner, O. A. (1966). Podocarpaceae. In: Codd, L. E., de Winter, B. & Rycroft, H. B. (eds) Flora of Southern Africa 1: 34–41. [Pretoria]: Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Republic of South Africa.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (1960). 2. Podocarpaceae. In: Exell, A. W. & Wild, H. (eds) Flora Zambesiaca 1: 83–86. London: Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and Administrations. On behalf of the Governments of Portugal, Federation of Rhodesia & Nyasaland, and the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Li, H.-L. (1963). Woody flora of Taiwan. Morris Arboretum Monograph. Norberth: University of Pennsylvania, Livingstone Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Li, H.-L. & Keng, H. (1994). Podocarpaceae. In: Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan (ed.) Flora of Taiwan. Vol. 1. Pteridophyta and Gymnospermeae. Ed. 2, pp. 557–565. Taipei: Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan. [Podocarpus by Y.-P. Yang & S.-Y. Lu, pp. 559–565.]Google Scholar
Lindley, J. (1851). Notices of certain Ornamental Plants lately introduced into England. J. Hort. Soc. London 6: 258–273.Google Scholar
Lindley, J. & Gordon, G. (1850). A catalogue of coniferous plants, with their synonyms. J. Hort. Soc. London 5: 199–228.Google Scholar
Lloyd, F. E. (1902). Vivipary in Podocarpus. Torreya 2: 113–117.Google Scholar
Lowry, J. B. (1968). Anthocyanin from a Malayan member of the Podocarpaceae. Phytochemistry 7: 1897–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, J. B. (1972). Anthocyanins of the Podocarpaceae. Phytochemistry 11: 725–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundell, C. L. (1937). Studies of Mexican and Central American plants – II(a). Phytologia 1(6): 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macêdo, N. A. & Leite, K. R. B. (1999). Aspectos anatômicos da folha de Podocarpus lambertii Klotzsch (Podocarpaceae). Sitientibus no. 20. www.uefs.br/sitientibus/pdf/20/aspectos_anatomicos.pdf downloaded 19 July 2010.Google Scholar
Marguerier, J. & Woltz, P. (1977). Anatomie comparée et systématique des Podocarpus malgaches (1ère partie). Adansonia n.s. 17(2): 155–192.Google Scholar
Markham, K. R., Webby, R. F. & Vilain, C. (1984). 7-O-Methyl-(2R:3R)-Dihydroquercetin 5-O-β-D-glucoside and other new flavonoids from the snow totara; Podocarpus nivalis. Phytochemistry 23: 2049–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, K. R., Webby, R. F., Whitehouse, L. A., Molloy, B. P. J., Vilain, C. & Mues, R. (1985). Support from flavonoid glycoside distribution for the division of Podocarpus in New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 23: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marticorena, C. & Rodríguez, R. (1995). Flora de Chile, I. Pteridophyta–Gymnospermae. Concepcion: Universidad de Concepcion.Google Scholar
Martín, R. A. (1993). Podocarpaceae. In: Killeen, T. J., Emilia García, E. & Beck, S. G. (eds) Guía de arboles de Bolivia, pp. 641–645. La Paz: Herbario Nacional de Bolivia, & St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Masson, D., Glidewell, S. M., Möller, M., Mill, R. R., Williamson, B. & Bateman, R. M. (2001). Non-destructive utilisation of herbarium material for taxonomic studies using NMR imaging. Edinburgh J. Bot. 58: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, M. T. (1890). Review of some points in the comparative morphology, anatomy, and life history of the Coniferae. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 27: 226–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, M. T. (1892). Two new Podocarps. Gard. Chron. ser. 3, 11: 113.Google Scholar
Matlin, S. A., Prazeres, M. A., Mersh, J. D., Sanders, J. K. M., Bittner, M. & Silva, M. (1982). Isolation and structure determination of nor-diterpene dilactones from Podocarpus saligna D. Don. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I: 2589–2993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlin, S. A., Bittner, M. & Silva, M. (1984a). Lignan and nor-diterpene dilactone constituents of Podocarpus saligna. Phytochemistry 23: 2867–2870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlin, S. A., Prazeres, A., Bittner, M. & Silva, M. (1984b). Norditerpene dilactones from Podocarpus saligna. Phytochemistry 23: 2863–2866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D. L., Marhold, K., Nicolson, D. H., Prado, J., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Wiersema, J. H. & Turland, N. J. (2006). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Regnum Veg. 146. Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag KG. 568 pp.Google Scholar
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Buck, W. R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J., Prud’homme van Reine, W. F., Smith, G. F., Wiersema, J. H. & Turland, N. J. (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum Veg. 154. Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag KG.Google Scholar
McVaugh, R. (1966). The occurrence of the genus Podocarpus in western Mexico. Sobretiro Ci. Mex. 24(5–6): 223–226.Google Scholar
Melikian, A. P. & Bobrov, A. V. (2000). Morfologiya shchenskikh reproduktivi’kh obganov i op’t rostroenniya filogeneticheskoj sistemy poryadkov Podocarpales, Cephalotaxales i Taxales. [Morphology of female reproductive structures and an attempt of the construction of phylogenetic system of orders Podocarpales, Cephalotaxales, and Taxales]. Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 85(7): 50–68.Google Scholar
Melville, R. (1955). The Podocarps of East Africa. Kew Bull. 1954: 563–574.Google Scholar
Melville, R. (1958). Podocarpaceae. In: Turrill, W. B. & Milne-Redhead, E. (eds) Flora of Tropical East Africa. Gymnospermae, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
Merello, M. (2003). Podocarpaceae. In: Hammel, B. E., Grayum, M. H., Herrera, C. & Zamora, N. (eds) Manuel de Plantas de Costa Rica. Volumen II. Gimnospermas y Monocotiledóneas (Agavaceae–Musaceae), pp. 11–13. St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
Mill, R. R. (2001). A new sectional combination in Nageia Gaertn. (Podocarpaceae). Edinburgh J. Bot. 58: 499–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, R. R. & Whiting, M. (2012). Podocarpus orarius (Podocarpaceae), a new species from the Solomon Islands and a taxonomic clarification of Podocarpus spathoides from Malaysia. Gard. Bull. Singapore 64: 171–193.Google Scholar
Miquel, F. A. W. (1851). Plantae junghuhnianae. Lugduni-Batavorum: A. W. Sythoff.Google Scholar
Mirbel, C. F. (1825). Essai sur la distribution géographique des Conifères. Mém. Mus. Hist. Nat. 13: 28–76.Google Scholar
Mohl, H. von (1871a). Morphologische Betrachtung der Blätter von Sciadopitys. Bot. Z. 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Mohl, H. von (1871b). Morphologische Betrachtung der Blätter von Sciadopitys. Bot. Z. 2: 17–23.Google Scholar
Morvan, J. (1968). L’appareil reproducteur femelle des Podocarpacées. Revue des principaux travaux (1807–1968). Bot. Rhedon. A, 5: 21–34.Google Scholar
Morvan, J. (1971a). L’appareil reproducteur femelle chez Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Don var. angustifolius Blume. Structure–ontogénie. Bot. Rhedon. A, 11: 1–174 [also cited as 1–162].Google Scholar
Morvan, J. (1971b). Quelques malformations du cône femelle chez Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) D.Don var. angustifolius Blume, sous l’action de l’acide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacétique. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 118: 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morvan, J. (1973). Sur la répartition et la structure des stomates à la surface des organes foliaires appartenant au cône femelle chez Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Don var. angustifolius Blume. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. D, 276(21): 2891–2894.Google Scholar
Morvan, J. (1975 [‘1973–74’]). Analyse et comparaison de quelques caractères épidermiques (cuticule, épiderme, stomates), de l’appareil vegetatif (tige et feuille) et du cône femelle chez Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Don var. angustifolius Blume. Bot. Rhedon. A, 13: 12–28.Google Scholar
Morvan, J. (1982). Traitements comparés des organes foliares pour l’observation du relief épicuticulaire au microscope électronique à la balayage chez Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Don var. angustifolius Blume. Bot. Rhedon. A, 17: 17–24.Google Scholar
Morvan, J. (1987). Observation au microscope électronique à balayage des formations cireuses épicuticulaire (feuille-tige-cone femelle) chez Podocarpus macrophyllus (Thunb.) Don var. angustifolius Blume Podocarpacées. Flora 179: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, E. M., Barker, N. P. & Mill, R. R. (2004). A Yellowwood by any other name: Molecular systematics and the taxonomy of Podocarpus and the Podocarpaceae in Southern Africa. S. African J. Sci. 100: 629–632.Google Scholar
Murray, B. G. & de Lange, P. J. (2011). Chromosomes and evolution in New Zealand endemic angiosperms and gymnosperms. In: Bramwell, D. & Caujape-Castells, J. (eds) The Biology of Island Floras, pp. 265–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, B. G., Friesen, N. & Heslop-Harrison, J. S. (2002). Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Podocarpus and comparison with other gymnosperm species. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) n.s. 89: 483–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakanishi, K., Koreeda, M., Sasaki, S., Chang, M. L. & Hsu, H. Y. (1966). Insect hormones I. The structure of ponasterone A, an insect-moulting hormone from the leaves of Podocarpus nakaii Hay. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1966(24): 915–917.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, K., Koreeda, M., Chang, M. L. & Hsu, H. Y. (1968). Insect hormones. V. The structures of ponasterones B and C. Tetrahedron Lett. 9: 1105–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, E. C. (1986). Podocarpaceae. In: Walters, S. M. et al. (eds) European Garden Flora 1: 74–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. (‘Senilis’). (1866). Pinaceae: being a handbook of the firs and pines. By Senilis. London: Hatchard & Co.Google Scholar
Offler, C. E. (1984). Extant and fossil Coniferales of Australia and New Guinea. Part I: A study of the external morphology of the vegetative shoots of the extant species. Palaeontographica, Abt. B, Paläophytol. 193: 18–120.Google Scholar
Ornelas, J. F., Ruiz-Sánchez, E. & Sosa, V. (2010). Phylogeography of Podocarpus matudae (Podocarpaceae): pre-Quaternary relicts in northern Mesoamerican cloud forests. J. Biogeogr. 37: 2384–2396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, M. Y (1937). On the value for diagnostic purposes of certain of the anatomical features of conifer leaves. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 94: 255–266, pls. CCLVI–CCLVIII.Google Scholar
Orr, M. Y. (1944). The leaf anatomy of Podocarpus. Trans. Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh 34: 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, C. N. (1989 [‘1988’]). New and maintained genera in the conifer families Podocarpaceae and Pinaceae. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 45: 377–395.Google Scholar
Palgrave, K. C. (1977). Trees of Southern Africa. Ed. 1. Cape Town: Struik Publishers.Google Scholar
Palgrave, K. C. (1983). Trees of Southern Africa. Ed. 2. Cape Town: Struik Publishers.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. & Pitman, N. (1972). Trees of Southern Africa. Cape Town: A. A. Balkema. [Podocarpaceae pp. 324–333.]Google Scholar
Parham, J. W. (1972). Plants of the Fiji Islands. Revised edition. Suva: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Parlatore, P. (1868a). Dacrydium, Pherosphaera, Lepidothamnus, Saxe-Gothæa, Phyllocladus. In: De Candolle, A., Prodromus systematis vegetabilium 16(2): 493–499.Google Scholar
Parlatore, P. (1868b). Podocarpus. In: De Candolle, A., Prodromus systematis vegetabilium 16(2): 507–521.Google Scholar
Patel, R. N. (1967). Wood anatomy of Podocarpaceae indigenous to New Zealand. 2. Podocarpus. New Zealand J. Bot. 5: 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persoon, C. H. (1807). Synopsis Plantarum, seu Enchiridion botanicum, complectens enumerationem systematicam specierum hucusque cognitarum. Pars secunda. Parisiis Lutetiorum: apud Bibliopolas Treuttel et Würtz, et Tübingen, apud J. G. Cottam. / Treuttel & Würtz; Tübingen: J. G. Cotta.Google Scholar
Phengklai, C. (1973). Podocarpaceae. Thai Forest Bull., Bot. 7: 9–20.Google Scholar
Phengklai, C. (1975). Podocarpaceae. In: Flora of Thailand 2(3): 197–203. Bangkok: Applied Scientific Research Corporation of Thailand.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1903). Taxaceae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich IV.5 (Heft 18). Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1904). Taxaceae, p. 1. In: Sodiro, A., Plantae ecuadorenses. III. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 34, Beibl. 78: 1–16.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1905). Ein neuer andiner Podocarpus. Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 1: 189–190.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1913). Ein neuer Podocarpus. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 5: 299.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1914). Taxaceae. In: Mildbraed, J. (ed.) Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Zentral-Afrika Expedition 1907–1908 unter führung Adolf Friedrichs, Herzogs zu Mecklenburg. Leipzig: Klinkhardt & Biermann.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1915). Podocarpus, in Die von Dr. Th. Herzog auf seiner zweiten Reise durch Bolivien in der Jahren 1910 und 1911 gesammelten Pflanzen Teil II. Meded. Rijks-Herb. 27: 2–3.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1916a). Kritische Übersicht über die neuere Literatur betreffend die Familie der Taxaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 54: 1–43.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1916b). Die Taxaceen Papuasiens. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 54: 207–211.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1916c). Die Taxales. Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 25: 1–28.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1923). Eine neue Podocarpus-Art aus Peru. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 8(74): 273–274.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1926). Podocarpaceae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien ed. 2, 13 Band, Gymnospermae, pp. 211–249. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1934). Taxaceae. In: Mildbraed, J. (ed.) Neue und seltene Arten aus Ostafrika (Tanganyika-Territ. Mandat) leg. H. J. Schlieben, VI. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 12: 79–108.Google Scholar
Pilger, R. (1937). Die Podocarpaceae der Sammlung C. J. Braß aus Südost-Neuguinea. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 68: 244–247. [Being Lauterbach, C., Beiträge zur Flora von Papuasien XXII. Botanische Ergebnisse der mit Hilfe der Hermann und Elisa geb. Heckmann - Wentzel - Stiftung ausgeführten Forschungen in Papuasien, verbunden mit Bearbeiten anderer Sammlungen aus diesen Gebiete (130).]Google Scholar
Questel, A. (1951). La flore de la Guadeloupe (Antilles françaises). Géographie générale de la Guadeloupe et des ses dépendances. Paris: Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Quiroga, M. P. & Premoli, A. C. (2007). Genetic patterns in Podocarpus parlatorei reveal the long-term persistence of cold-tolerant elements in the southern Yungas. J. Biogeogr. 34: 447–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroga, M. P. & Premoli, A. C. (2010). Genetic structure of Podocarpus nubigena (Podocarpaceae) provides evidence of Quaternary and ancient historical events. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 285: 186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiroga, M. P. & Premoli, A. C. (2013). El rol de las poblaciones marginales en la conservación del acervo genético de la única conífera del sur de Yungas en Argentina y Bolivia, Podocarpus parlatorei (Podocarpaceae). Ecol. Bolivia 48(1): 4–16.Google Scholar
Quiroga, M. P., Pacheco, S., Malizia, L. R. & Premoli, A. C. (2012). Shrinking forests under warming: evidence of Podocarpus parlatorei (pino del cerro) from the Subtropical Andes. J. Heredity 103: 682–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radais, M. L. (1894). Anatomie comparée du fruit des conifères. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 7, 19: 165–368, pls. 1–15.Google Scholar
Rendle, A. B. (1894). [Protologue of Podocarpus milanjianus Rendle.] In: Carruthers, W., The plants of Milanji, Nyasa-land, collected by Mr. Alexander Whyte, F. L. S. and described by Messrs. Britten, E. G. Baker, Rendle, Gepp and others; with an introduction by William Carruthers, F. R. S., F. L. S. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. 4: 1–67.Google Scholar
Richard, L. C. (1826). Commentatio botanica de Conifereis et Cycadeis characteres genericos singulorum utriusque familiae et figuris analyticis eximie ab autore ipso ad naturam delineatis ornatos complectens. Opus posthumum ab Achille Richard filio, perfectum et in lucem edito. Stuttgardiae: J. G. Cotta. [Posthumous, ed. A. Richard.]Google Scholar
Rouane, M. L., Gondran, M. & Woltz, P. (1988). Hétérocotylie et évolution cotyledonaire chez les Podocarpineae. Gaussenia 4: 7–15.Google Scholar
Rumphius, G. E. (1743). Herbarium amboinense plurimas complectens arbores, frutices, herbas, plantas terrestres & aquaticas, quae in Amboina, et adjacentibus reperiuntur insulis, adcuratissime descriptas juxta earum formas, cum diversis denominationibus, cultura, usu, ac virtutibus. … Amstelaedami: apud Franciscum Changuion, Joannem Catuffe, Hermannum Uyterf.Google Scholar
Salmon, J. T. (1980). The native trees of New Zealand. Wellington: A. H. & W. Reed.Google Scholar
Sarlin, P. (1954). Bois et forêts de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Nogent-sur-Marne: Centre Technique Forestier Tropical.Google Scholar
Schoonraad, E. & van der Schijff, H. P. (1974). Anatomy of leaves of the genus Podocarpus in South Africa. Phytomorphology 24: 75–85.Google Scholar
Schoonraad, E. & van der Schijff, H. P. (1975). Distribution and some interesting morphological aspects of the South African Podocarpaceae . Boissiera 24a: 135–144.Google Scholar
Seemann, B. (1868). Flora vitiensis: a description of the plants of the Viti or Fiji Islands with an account of their history, uses, and properties. 10 parts. London: L. Reeve & Co. [Podocarps in part 9, 1868.]Google Scholar
Sénéclauze, A. (1867). Les Conifères. Monographie descriptive et raisonnée classée par ordre alphabétique de la collection complète des Conifères, tant indigènes qu’exotiques cultivés dans l’établissement horticole de Adrien Sénéclauze. Paris: C. Lahure.Google Scholar
Siebold, P. F. & Zuccarini, J. G. (1845–1846). Florae japonicae familiae naturales, adjectis generum et specierum exemplis selectis. Sectio prima, Abh. Mat.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 4(2): 109–204, in 1845; sectio altera, op. cit. 4(3): 123–240, in 1846.Google Scholar
Silba, A. D. & de Silva, J. A. (2013a). [Protologue, Podocarpus thailandensis A.D.Silba & J.A.Silva]. J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 20(1): 2.Google Scholar
Silba, A. D. & de Silva, J. A. (2013b). [Protologue, Podocarpus letocartii A.D.Silba & J.A.Silva]. J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 20(1): 6.Google Scholar
Silba, A. D. & de Silva, J. A. (2014). Yon nouvo nan Podocarpus oleifolius D.Don (Podocarpaceae) soti nan Columbia. J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 21(1): 19–30.Google Scholar
Silba, J. (1984). An international census of the Coniferae, I. Phytologia Mem. 7. Plainfield, NJ: Harold N. Moldenke & Alma L. Moldenke.Google Scholar
Silba, J. (1986). Encyclopaedia Coniferae. Phytologia Mem. 8. Corvallis, OR: Harold N. Moldenke & Alma L. Moldenke.Google Scholar
Silba, J. (1990). A supplement to the International Census of the Coniferae, II. Phytologia 68: 7–78; corrections, Phytologia 68: 512.Google Scholar
Silba, J. (2000). Variation geographic et populations isole de les gymnospermes rarissime. J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 7(1): 17–40. [The grammatical and orthographic errors in the title are as published.]Google Scholar
Silba, J. (2008a). [Protologue, Podocarpus ballivianensis Silba]. J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 15(1): 1–2, f. 1.Google Scholar
Silba, J. (2008b). [Protologue, Podocarpus tixieri Gaussen ex Silba]. J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 15(2): 34–35.Google Scholar
Silba, J. (2009). [Protologue, Podocarpus lawrencei subsp. errinundraensis]. J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 16(2): 71–74.Google Scholar
Silba, J. (2010). An international census of the Coniferae. Part II. Podocarpus. J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 17(1): 7–19, 19 [bis], 20.Google Scholar
Silba, J. (with correspondence from Adam Black) (2014). La decouverte de nouveaux Coniferae (Araucaria et Podocarpaceae) dans le sud de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (Île du Pacifique sud de la Grande Terre). J. Int. Conifer Preserv. Soc. 21(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Silva, M., Bittner, M. & Sammes, P. G. (1973). Diterpenoids of Podocarpus nubigena. Phytochemistry 12: 883–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, W. T., Mill, R. R., Gardner, M. F., Woltz, P., Jaffré, T., Preston, J., Hollingsworth, M. L., Ponge, A. & Möller, M. (2002). Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer, Parasitaxus usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 233: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott, E. W. (1913). The morphology of the reproductive structure in the Podocarpineae. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) o.s. 27: 39–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siqueira, V. L. & Ferreira, A. G. (1987). Germinação de sementes de Podocarpus lambertii Kl.: caracteristicas qualitativas e quantitativas. Iheringia 36: 57–63.Google Scholar
Smith, A. C. (1979). Flora vitiensis nova. A new flora of Fiji (Spermatophytes only). Vol. 1. Introduction; Gymnospermae, Families 1–6; Angiospermae, Monocotyledones, Families 7–43 (except Family 32, Orchidaceae). Lawai, Kauai, Hawaii: Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden. [Podocarpaceae, pp. 92–108.]Google Scholar
Stanley, T. D. & Ross, E. M. (1989). Flora of South-eastern Queensland. Vol. III. Queensland Department of Primary Industries Miscellaneous Publication QM88001. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Primary Industries. [Podocarpus, pp. 453–454.]Google Scholar
Stapf, O. (1914). Taxaceae. In: Gibbs, L. S., A contribution to the flora and plant formations of Mount Kinabalu and the Highlands of British North Borneo, pp. 191–195. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 42: 1–240.Google Scholar
Stapf, O. (1917). Order CXXIXa. Taxaceae. In: Prain, D. (ed.) Flora of Tropical Africa 6(2): 338–344.Google Scholar
Stapf, O. (1933). Order CXXVII A. Podocarpaceae. In: Hill, A. W. (ed.) Flora Capensis 5(2): 3–14. Ashford, Kent: L. Reeve & Co.Google Scholar
Stark Schilling, D. (2004). Taxonomic studies of Caribbean and Central American species of Podocarpus subgenus Podocarpus: A multi-disciplinary approach. Unpublished MSc thesis, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh/University of Edinburgh. 140 pp. + CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Stark Schilling, D. & Mill, R. R. (2011). Cuticular micromorphology of Caribbean species of Podocarpus (Podocarpaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 172: 601–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staszkiewicz, J. (1988). A taxonomic revision of the genus Podocarpus from the Greater and Lesser Antilles. Rewizja taksonomiczna rodzaju Podocarpus z Wielkich i Małych Antyli. Fragm. Florist. Geobot. 33(1–2): 71–106.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. W. (1999). Podocarpaceae. In: Jørgensen, P. M. & Léon-Yánez, S. (eds) Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Ecuador, pp. 189–190. Being Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75. St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. & Zanoni, T. (1991). Flora of the Guianas. Series A: phanerogams. Fascicle 9: gymnosperms. 208: Cycadaceae; 208.1: Zamiaceae; 209: Gnetaceae; 210: Pinaceae; 211: Podocarpaceae. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific.Google Scholar
Stiles, W. (1912). The Podocarpeae. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) o.s. 26: 443–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockey, R. A., Frevel, B. J. & Woltz, P. (1998). Cuticle micromorphology of Podocarpus subgenus Podocarpus section Scytopodium (Podocarpaceae) of Madagascar and South Africa. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 159: 923–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffberg, E. (1991a). Morphological and ontogenetic studies on southern African podocarps. Shoot apex morphology and ovuliferous cone initiation. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 105: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffberg, E. (1991b). Morphological and ontogenetic studies on southern African podocarps. Initiation of the seed scale complex and early development of integument, nucellus and epimatium. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 105: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Ying-Juan, Wang, Ting, Chen, Guo-Pei, An, Yu, Zuo, Wu-Lin, Sun, Yu-Fei, Deng, Feng & Sun, Xu (2004). [Bayesian inference of the phylogeny of Podocarpaceae based on trnL-F sequence data.] Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Sunyatseni 43(6): 32–36.Google Scholar
Suzuki, M. (1979). The course of resin canals in the shoots of conifers: 1. Taxaceae, Cephalotaxaceae and Podocarpaceae. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 92(1027): 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, R. (1818). Hortus suburbanus Londinensis. London: James Ridgway.Google Scholar
Tengnér, J. (1967). Anatomy and taxonomy in the Podocarpaceae. Bot. Not. 120: 504–506.Google Scholar
Thomas, F. A. W. (1863). De foliorum frondosorum Coniferararum structura anatomica. Berolini: Gustavus Schade. [Also a German version titled Zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Coniferen-Laubblätter, Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. (Pringsheim) 4: 23–63, 1865.]Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. (1784). Flora japonica sistens plantas insularum japonicarum secundum systema sexuale emendatum redactas ad XX classes, ordines, genera et species cum differentiis specificis, synonymis paucis, descriptionibus concinnis et XXXIX iconibus adjectis. Lipsiae: J. G. Mülleriano.Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. (1800). Prodromus plantarum capensium, quas in Promontorio Bonae Spei Africes, annis 1772–1775, collegit Carol. Pet. Thunberg. Upsaliae: Joh. Fr. Edman. [Publ. 1794–1800; pars posterior, 1800, includes Taxus.]Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. (1992). Aspects of cone morphology and development in Podocarpaceae (Coniferales). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 153: 572–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. (1994). Functional morphology of saccate pollen in conifers with special reference to Podocarpaceae. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 155: 699–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. (2000). Structural features of saccate pollen types in relation to their functions. In: Harley, M. M., Morton, C. M. & Blackmore, S. (eds) Pollen and Spores: Morphology and Biology, pp. 147–169. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. & Takaso, T. (1998). Hydrodynamics of pollen capture in conifers. In: Owens, S. J. & Rudall, P. J. (eds) Reproductive Biology in Systematics, Conservation and Economic Botany, pp. 265–275. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B., Braggins, J. E. & Rattenbury, J. A. (1991). Pollination drop in relation to cone morphology in Podocarpaceae: a novel reproductive mechanism. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1289–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B., Braggins, J. E. & Rattenbury, J. A. (1997). Contrasted pollen capture mechanisms in Phyllocladaceae and certain Podocarpaceae (Coniferales). Amer. J. Bot. 84: 214–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres-Romero, J. H. (1988). Podocarpaceae. In: Pinto, P. & Lozano, G. (eds) Flora Colombia Monogr. 5, pp. 5–67. Bogotá: Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural, Faculdad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Turner, B. L. & Cernusak, L. A. (eds) (2011). Ecology of the Podocarpaceae in Tropical Forests. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, No. 95. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, J. (1960a). Palynological notes of Podocarpaceae. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 18(7): 198–207.Google Scholar
Ueno, J. (1960b). Studies on the pollen grains of Gymnospermae. Concluding remarks to the relationships between Coniferae. J. Inst. Polytechn. Osaka City Univ., Ser. D, Biol. 11: 109–136.Google Scholar
Ueno, J. (1984). Illustrated palynological family tree of Gymnospermae (I). Jap. J. Palynol. 30: 43–49.Google Scholar
Ueno, J. (1985a). Illustrated palynological family tree of Gymnospermae (II). Jap. J. Palynol. 31: 7–33.Google Scholar
Ueno, J. (1985b). Illustrated palynological taxonomy of Podocarpaceae and proposition of new genus Dacrycarpus. Jap. J. Palynol. 31: 15–33.Google Scholar
Urban, I. (1920). Symbolae antillanae seu fundamenta florae Indiae occidentalis. VIII. Flora domingensis. Lipsiae: Borntraeger. [Published 1920–1921; Podocarpus in Feb. 1920.]Google Scholar
Urban, I. (1922). Sertum antillanum. XIV. Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 18: 17–26.Google Scholar
Urban, I. (1924). Sertum antillanum. XIX. Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 19: 298–308.Google Scholar
van Royen, P. (1979). The alpine flora of New Guinea. Vol. 2. Taxonomic part, Cupressaceae–Poaceae. Vaduz: J. Cramer. [Podocarpaceae, pp. 7–35.]Google Scholar
van Tieghem, P. (1891). Structure et affinités des Stachycarpus. Genre nouveau de la famille des conifères. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 38: 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasil, I. K. & Aldrich, H. C. (1973). Histochemistry and ultrastructure of pollen development in Podocarpus macrophyllus D. Don. In: Heslop-Harrison, J. (ed.) Pollen Development and Physiology, pp. 70–74. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Veillon, J. M. (1962). Coniferas autóctonas de Venezuela. Los Podocarpus. Mérida: Talleres Gráficos Universitarios (Univ. de Los Andes, Fas. Ciencias Forest.). 156 pp.Google Scholar
Vicuña-Miñano, E. E. (2005). Las Podocarpáceas de los bosques montanos del noroccidente peruano. Podocarpaceae of the montane forests from northwestern Peru. Rev. Peru. Biol. 12: 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieillard, E. (1862). Plantes utiles de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 4, 16: 28–76.Google Scholar
Wasscher, J. (1941). The genus Podocarpus in the Netherlands Indies. Blumea 4(3): 359–481.Google Scholar
Wenkert, E. & Ching-Jer, Chang (1974). Nagilactone C from Podocarpus purdieanus. Phytochemistry 15: 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. T. (1933). Ligneous plants collected for the Arnold Arboretum in North Queensland by S. F. Kajewski in 1929. Jamaica Plain, MA: Arnold Arboretum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, M. (2009). Cuticular micromorphology of Podocarpus as a systematic tool. MSc thesis, University of Edinburgh/Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Wikramanayake, E., Dinerstein, E., Louks, C. J., Olson, D. M., Morrison, J., Lamoreux, J., McKnight, M. & Hedao, P. (eds) (2000). Terrestrial ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: a conservation assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, M. H. (1944). A new interpretation of coniferous cones. 1. Podocarpaceae (Podocarpus). Ann. Bot. (Oxford) n.s. 8: 1–41.Google Scholar
Williams, R. L. (2004). An intellectual biography of Elie-Abel Carrière (1818–1896). Brittonia 56: 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, V. R. & Owens, J. N. (1999). The reproductive biology of Totara (Podocarpus totara) (Podocarpaceae). Ann. Bot. (Oxford) n.s. 81: 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, V. R. & Owens, J. N. (2003). Cytoplasmic inheritance in Podocarpus totara (Podocarpaceae). Acta Hort. (ISHS) 615: 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woltz, P. (1969). Une nouvelle espèce de Podocarpus de Madagascar. P. gaussenii. Trav. Lab. Forest. Toulouse 1(8), Art. 2. Toulouse: Faculté des Sciences.Google Scholar
Woltz, P. (1970 [‘1969’]). Morphologie et anatomie de quelques plantules de Podocarpaceae malgaches. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 116: 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woltz, P. (1973). Systematique et anatomie comparée de feuilles de Podocarpus malgaches. Trav. Lab. Forest. Toulouse 1(9), Art. 1. Toulouse: Faculté des Sciences.Google Scholar
Woltz, P. (1986). Les Podocarpus (s.l.): origines et evolution. Étude des plantules comparaisons avec les familles de Conifères de l’hemisphère Sud. Thèse Doct. État. Univ. Aix-Marseille III. 368 pp.Google Scholar
Woltz, P. (1988 [‘1987’]). Les Podocarpineae, étude des plantules et évolution. Comparaison avec les familles de Conifères de l’hémisphère sud: Araucariaceae, Cupressaceae, Taxodiaceae, Taxaceae. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, Actual. Bot. 134: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woltz, P., Gajardo, R. & Ferreira, A. G. (1987). Anatomia comparada das folhas e evolução das Podocarpineae. Acta Bot. Brasil. 1(2): 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, T. (1995). Podocarpaceae. In: Iwatsuki, K., Yamazaki, T., Boufford, D. E. & Ohba, H. (eds) Flora of Japan 1: 284. Tokyo: Kodansha Ltd.Google Scholar
Zhou, Q-Z. & Gu, Z-J. (2001). Karyomorphology of Podocarpus s.l. in China and its systematic significance. Caryologia 54: 121–127.Google Scholar