Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-30T10:32:52.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revision of Geoffroea(Leguminoscw–Papilionoideae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

H. Ireland  and
R. T. Pennington
H. Ireland
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK. Corresponding author.
R. T. Pennington
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Geoffroea (Leguminosae–Papilionoideae) has traditionally comprised three species. In this revision the number of species is reduced to two because G. striata (Willd.) Morong is considered indistinct from G. spinosa Jacq. and is placed in synonymy. No significant morphological variation is found between the five isolated areas of distribution of G. spinosa, which occurs in the disjunct seasonally dry tropical forests of South America, and there is certainly no basis for recognizing separate taxa.

Keywords

Biogeographyneotropicsseasonally dry tropical forest

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , November 1999 , pp. 329 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aublet, F. (1775). Hist. Pl. Guiane iii, t. 301. Paris: P. F. Didot Jeune.Google Scholar
Bentham, G. (1837). Commentationes de Leguminosarum Generibus, pp. 43–45. Vindobonae (Vienna): J. P. Sollingeri.Google Scholar
Bentham, G. (1839). De leguminosarum generibus commentationes. Ann. Mus. Weiner Naturgesch. 2 (1): 107–109.Google Scholar
Bondt, N. (1788). Dissertatio Medica Inauguralis de Cortice Geoffraeae Surinamensis. Leiden: Lugduni Batavorum.Google Scholar
Burkart, A. (1949). La positión sistemática del ‘chañar’ y las especies del género Geoffroea (Leguminosae–Dalbergieae). Darwiniana 9: 9–23.Google Scholar
Clos, D. (1846). In: Gay, C. (ed.) Fl. Chil. 2: 218. Paris: Fain y Thunot.Google Scholar
D'Angelo, C., Prado, D. E., Stofella, S. L. & Lewis, J. P. (1987) The subchaquenian vegetation of the province of Santa Fe (Argentina). Phytocoenologia 15: 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, E. R., Leussink, J. A. & Stafleu, F. A. (1979). Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantamm), vol. 2. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.Google Scholar
Gardner, G. (1849). Travels in the Interior of Brazil. 2nd edition. London: Reeve, Banham & Reeve.Google Scholar
Gentry, A. H. (1990). Evolutionary patterns in Neotropical Bignoniaceae. Mem. New York. Bot. Gard. 55: 118–129.Google Scholar
Greuter, W. (ed.) (1994). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code). Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1833) Bot. Misc. 3: 207. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Humboldt, A. & Bonpland, A. J. (1809). Pl. Æquinoct. 2: 69.Google Scholar
Humboldt, A., Bonpland, A. J. & Kunth, K. S. (1823). Nov. Gen. Sp. 6: 370. Paris: Lutetuae Parisiorum.Google Scholar
Jacquin, N. J. (1760). Enum. Syst. PL: 7, 28. Leiden: Lugduni Batavorum.Google Scholar
Jacquin, N. J. (1763). Select. Stirp. Amer. Hist.: 207. CLXXX, f. 62. Vindobonae (Vienna): Ex Officina Krausiana.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. P., Stofella, S. L., Prado, D. E., Pire, E. F., Franceschi, E. A. & Carnevale, N. J. (1990) Dynamics and development of floristic richness in the vegetation of a large depressed area of the Great Chaco. Flora 184: 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1763). Sp. Pl. ed. 2 (2): 1043. Holmiae, Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1774). In: Murray, J. A. (ed.) Syst. Veg. ed. 13: 556. Gottingae et Gothae: Typis et impensis Jo. Christ. Dieterich.Google Scholar
Molina, G. I. (1782). Sag. Stor. Nat. Chili: 188, 352. Bologna: C. Guiseppe Grotti.Google Scholar
Morong, T. (1892). An enumeration of the plants collected by Dr Thomas Morong in Paraguay 1888–1890. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 7: 87.Google Scholar
Moussy, M. De (1860). Description Géographique et Statistique de la Confédération Argentine 1: 403. Paris: Firmin Didot Frères, fils et cie.Google Scholar
Pennington, R. T. (1994). The Taxonomy and Molecular Systematics of Andira. D.Phil, thesis. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Pennington, R. T. & De Lima, H. C. (1995). Two new species of Andira from Brazil and the influence of dispersal in determining their distributions. Kew Bull. 50: 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, T. D. (1990). Flora Neotropica. Monograph 52: Sapotaceae: 279–282. New York: New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Piso, W. & Marcgrave, G. (1648) Historia Naturalis Brasilia. Leiden and Amsterdam: L. & D. Elzevirios.Google Scholar
Prado, D. E. & Gibbs, P. E. (1993). Patterns of species distributions in the dry seasonal forests of South America. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 902–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprengel, K. (1818). Anleit. Kenntn. Gew. ed. 2 (2): 773.Google Scholar
Stokes, J. (1812) Bot. Mat. Med.: 46. London: J. Johnson & Co.Google Scholar
Wiggin, I. L. & Porter, D. M. (1971). Flora of the Galapagos Islands: 621–623. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Willdenow, C. W. (1803). Sp. Pl. 3 (2): 1132. Berolini (Berlin): G. C. Nauk.Google Scholar
Wright, W. W. (1777). Description and use of the cabbage-bark tree of Jamaica. Philos. Trans. 67: 507–512.Google Scholar