Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-c97xr Total loading time: 0.409 Render date: 2022-05-23T12:21:58.440Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Same difference: the phonetic shape of High Rising Terminals in London

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2018

Erez Levon*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road London E1 4NS, UKe.levon@qmul.ac.uk

Abstract

This article investigates patterns of variation in the phonetic shape of High Rising Terminal (HRT) intonation contours on declarative utterances in London English. Previous research has demonstrated that there are two pragmatically distinct meanings for HRTs in London, distributed across different groups of users and conversational contexts. Based on current theories of intonational meaning, we would expect this pragmatic differentiation to correlate with differences in tune shape, given the assumption that there is a one-to-one correspondence between a contour’s meaning and its phonological form. Following the example of prior studies of HRTs in other locations, analyses focus on three phonetic properties: rise excursion size, rise dynamism, and the alignment of the rise onset with the nuclear syllable. Unlike much previous research elsewhere, mixed-model regression analyses demonstrate that pragmatic differences in how HRTs are used in London do not correlate with differences in the phonetic characteristics under investigation. The discussion focuses on how to reconcile this result with theories of intonational meaning, arguing that the findings for London may be due to the relatively recent arrival of HRTs in the variety, and, as a result, the lack of a differentiated field of form–meaning correspondences for the contour in the region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arvaniti, Amalia & Atkins, Madeleine. 2016. Uptalk in Southern British English. In Jon Barnes, Alejna Brugos, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Nanette Veilleux (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 153–7. Boston: Boston University.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Ladd, D. Robert. 2009. Greek wh-questions and the phonology of intonation. Phonology 26, 4374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Angela. 2008. The form, function and distribution of high rising intonation in Southern California and Southern British English. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr Muller.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2015. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Available at: www.praat.orgGoogle Scholar
Bradford, Barbara. 1997. Upspeak in British English. English Today 13, 2936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil, David, Coulthard, Malcolm & Johns, Catherine. 1980. Discourse intonation and language teaching. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 1992. Linguistic change in intonation: The use of High Rising Terminals in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 4, 77104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David & Newman, John. 1992. High Rising Terminals in New Zealand English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 22, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ching, Marvin. 1982. The question intonation in assertions. American Speech 57, 95107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1994. Rises in English. In Jack Lewis (ed.), Studies in general and English phonetics: Essays in honour of Professor J. D. O’Connor, 155173. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daly, Nicola & Warren, Paul. 2001. Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: Speaker sex and intonation patterns. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5, 8596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 453476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2016. Variation, meaning and social change. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 6585. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Janet, Grabe, Esther & Warren, Paul. 2005. Intonational variation in four varieties of English: The high rising tune. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 390409. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Janet & Harrington, Jonathan. 2001. High rising terminals and fall-rises in Australian English. Phonetica 51, 215219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Janet & Loakes, Deborah. 2006. Patterns of rising and falling in Australian English. In Paul Warren & Catherine Watson (eds.), Proceedings of 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 42–7. Canberra: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Janet, Stirling, Lesley, Lushin, Ilana & Wales, Roger. 2002. Intonational rises and dialog acts in the Australian English map task. Language and Speech 45, 229253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gioacchino, Martina Di & Crook Jessop, Lorena. 2011. Uptalk: Towards a quantitative analysis. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 33, 116.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther. 2004. Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. In Peter Gilles & Jörg Peters (eds.), Regional variation in intonation, 931. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory, Horvath, Barbara, Vonwiller, Julia, Daisley, Elaine & Rogers, Inge. 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15, 2352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory & Vonwiller, Julia. 1984. The meaning of an intonation in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 4, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henton, Caroline. 1995. Pitch dynamism in female and male speech. Language and Communication 15, 4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia. 2002. The pragmatics of intonational meaning. In Bernard Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody Conference, 6568. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of linguistic change: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William & Waletzky, Joshua. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 1244. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1983. Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language 59, 721759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert & Morton, Rachel. 1997. The perception of intonational emphasis: Continuous or categorical? Journal of Phonetics 25, 313342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and woman’s place. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez. 2016. Gender, interaction and intonational variation: The discourse functions of High Rising Terminals in London. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20, 133163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark. 2008. Uptalk vs UNBI again [blog post]. Language Log. 23 November. Retrieved from http://languagelog/ldc/upenn.eduGoogle Scholar
McGregor, Jeannette & Palethorpe, Sallyanne. 2008. High Rising Tunes in Australian English: The communicative function of L* and H* pitch accent onsets. Australian Journal of Linguistics 28, 171193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLemore, Cynthia. 1991. The pragmatic interpretation of English intonation: Sorority speech. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Moore, Brian & Glasberg, Brian. 1983. Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74, 750–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolan, Francis. 2003. Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 771–4. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert. 2011. Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39, 233264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223254. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information status. In William Mann & Sandra Thomspon (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fundraising text, 295325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: www.r-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Ritchart, Amanda & Arvaniti, Amalia. 2014. The form and use of uptalk in Southern California English. In Nick Campbell, Dafydd Gibbon & Daniel Hirst (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, 1620. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Shobbrook, Katherine & House, Jill. 2003. High rising tones in Southern British English. In Maria-Josep Sole, Daniel Recasens & Joaquin Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, 1273–6. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Shokeir, Vanessa. 2008. Evidence for the stable use of uptalk in South Ontario English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 1624.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23, 193229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, Mark. 1991. Structure and intonation. Language 67, 260296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, Mark. 2014. The surface compositional semantics of English intonation. Language 90, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41, 3157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2013. Comparative sociolingistics. In J. K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 2nd edn, 128156. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Joseph. 2015a. A social explanation for a gender difference in the size of terminal rising pitch (uptalk). Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 44, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Tyler, Joseph. 2015b. Expanding and mapping the indexical field: Rising pitch, the uptalk stereotype, and perceptual variation. Journal of English Linguistics 43, 284310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Gregory & Hirschberg, Julia. 1985. Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall–rise intonation. Language 61, 747776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Paul. 2005. Patterns of late rising in New Zealand: Intonational variation or intonational change? Language Variation and Change 17, 209230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Paul. 2016. Uptalk: The phenomenon of rising intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Paul & Britain, David. 2000. Intonation and prosody in New Zealand English. In Allan Bell & Koenraad Kuiper (eds.), New Zealand English, 146172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Paul & Daly, Nicola. 2005. Characterizing New Zealand English intonation: Broad and narrow analysis. In Allan Bell, R. Harlow & D. Sparks (eds.), Languages of New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Same difference: the phonetic shape of High Rising Terminals in London
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Same difference: the phonetic shape of High Rising Terminals in London
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Same difference: the phonetic shape of High Rising Terminals in London
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *