Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Analogy-driven change: the emergence and development of mirative end up constructions in American English

  • MARIO SERRANO-LOSADA (a1)
Abstract

This article explores the diachronic development of mirative end up in American English, which emerged in the late nineteenth century and which seems to be, at present, in the process of becoming a parenthetical element. The rise of the various mirative end up constructions is argued to be the result of both pragmatic enrichment and paradigmatic analogy, motivated by a series of semantically and formally related expressions, most prominently by mirative turn out. Moreover, the article delves into the process of cooptation to explain the emergence of parenthetical instances in the present-day language. Cooptation is understood as an intrinsically analogical-driven mechanism when it entails the eventual grammaticalization of formulaic parenthetical constructions. Data for the present study were taken from a variety of diachronic and synchronic sources, which include COHA, COCA and NOW, among others.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

I would like to thank Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya, Caroline Gentens and Julia T. Williams Camus for their valuable feedback on earlier versions of this article. I am also very grateful to the editor, Laurel Brinton, and the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. All remaining shortcomings are, of course, my own. For generous financial support I thank the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (grant FPU13/02618), the European Regional Development Fund, the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (grant FFI2017-86884-P) and the Regional Government of Galicia (grants ED431B 2017/12 and ED431D 2017/09).

Footnotes
References
Hide All
CDE=Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. 2002–16. Mark Davies. www.corpusdelespanol.org
CLMET3.0=Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, v. 3.0. Hendrik De Smet, Hans-Jürgen Diller & Jukka Tyrkkö. https://perswww.kuleuven.be/u0044428/
COCA=The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 560 million words, 1990–present. 2008. Mark Davies. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
COHA=The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. 2010–16. Mark Davies.: http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/
Hansard=Hansard Corpus. 2015. Marc Alexander & Mark Davies. http://www.hansard-corpus.org
NOW=Corpus of News on the Web: 3+ billion words from 20 countries, updated every day. 2013. Mark Davies. http://corpus.byu.edu/now/
OED=Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1977. Tarma Quechua: Grammar, texts, dictionary. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2013. A Quechuan mirative? In Anne Storch & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, 95109. Leiden: Brill.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3), 435485.
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Slobin, Dan I.. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 159167. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2008. Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 12(1), 55102.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Change through recombination: Blending and analogy. Language Sciences 40, 8094.
De Smet, Hendrik & Fischer, Olga. 2017. The role of analogy in language change: Supporting constructions. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language, 240268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3), 529564.
Denison, David. 1985. The origins of completive up in English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86(1), 3761.
Diewald, Gabriele & Smirnova, Elena. 2010. Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages . Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Fanego, Teresa. 2010. Variation in sentential complements in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century English: A processing-based explanation. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change, 200220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fanego, Teresa. 2016. The Great Complement Shift revisited: The constructionalization of ACC-ing gerundives. Functions of Language 23(1), 84119.
Fischer, Olga. 2007. The development of English parentheticals: A case of grammaticalization? In Ute Smit, Stefan Dollinger, Julia Hüttner, Gunther Kaltenböck & Ursula Lutzky (eds.), Tracing English through time: Explorations in language variation , 99-114. Vienna: Braunmüller.
Fischer, Olga. 2008. On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization. Studies in Language 32(2), 336382.
González Fernández, M. Jesús, & Maldonado, Ricardo. 1998. La perfectividad como fuente de contraexpectativas: Resulta que ‘x’ finalmente ‘y’ . In Andrés Acosta Félix, Zarina Estrada Fernández, Max Figueroa Esteva & Gerardo López Cruz (eds.), IV Encuentro Internacional de Lingüstica en el Noroeste , vol. II: Estudios del español, 6182. Hermosillo: Universidad Autónoma de Sonora.
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6), 12051247.
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4), 852897.
Krawczak, Karolina & Glynn, Dylan. 2015. Operationalizing mirativity: A usage-based quantitative study of constructional construal in English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13(2), 353382.
López-Couso, María José & Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2014a. Epistemic parentheticals with seem: Late Modern English in focus. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English syntax, 291308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
López-Couso, María José & Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2014b. From clause to pragmatic marker: A study of the development of like-parentheticals in American English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1), 3661.
Peterson, Tyler. 2013. Rethinking mirativity: The expression and implication of surprise. Unpublished manuscript.
Peterson, Tyler. 2017. Problematizing mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15(2), 312342.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Serrano-Losada, Mario. 2017a. On English turn out and Spanish resultar mirative constructions: A case of ongoing grammaticalization? Journal of Historical Linguistics 7(1/2), 160189.
Serrano-Losada, Mario. 2017b. Raising turn out in Late Modern English: The rise of a mirative predicate. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15(2), 411437.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 1999. The go-and-verb construction in a cross-linguistic perspective: Image-schema blending and the construal of events. In Dawn Nordquist & Catie Berkenfield (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Annual High Desert Linguistics Society Conference, 123134. Alburquerque: University of New Mexico.
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the gramaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization , vol. II: Types of grammatical markers, 313329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1), 3155.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624647. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tyler, Andrea & Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed