Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:29:14.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arne Lohmann , English coordinate constructions: A processing perspective on constituent order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. 214. ISBN 978-1-107-04088-5.

Review products

Arne Lohmann , English coordinate constructions: A processing perspective on constituent order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. 214. ISBN 978-1-107-04088-5.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2016

Matthias Eitelmann
Matthias Eitelmann*
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Dept. of English and Linguistics, Jakob-Welder-Weg 18, 55128 Mainz, Germanyeitelman@uni-mainz.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , July 2016 , pp. 369 - 376
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bock, Kathryn J. & Levelt, Willem J. M.. 1994. Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, Morton A. (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 945–84. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dufter, Andreas, Fleischer, Jürg & Seiler, Guido (eds.). 2009. Describing and modeling variation in grammar (Trends in Linguistics 204). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa, López-Couso, María José & Pérez Guerra, Javier (eds.). 2002. English historical syntax and morphology: Selected papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7-11 September 2000. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1959. Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8, 113–60.Google Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2014. The (ir)reversibility of English binomials: Corpus, constraints, developments. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 2001. Copulative compounds: A closer look at the interface between syntax and morphology. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2000, 279–320. Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter & Mondorf, Britta (eds.). 2003. Determinants of grammatical variation in English (Topics in English Linguistics 43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schlüter, Julia. 2005. Rhythmic grammar: The influence of rhythm on grammatical variation and change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stallings, Lynn M., MacDonald, Maryellen C. & O'Seaghdha, Padraig G.. 1998. Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 392–417.Google Scholar