Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The basic valency orientation of Old English and the causative ja-formation: a synchronic and diachronic approach

  • LUISA GARCÍA GARCÍA (a1)

Abstract

The basic valency orientation of Old English has been addressed in a number of studies, without any consensus emerging so far. From a synchronic point of view, a key question is whether the pronounced tendency to labile coding in Present-day English can be traced back to the Old English period. In order to give a convincing answer, this article examines from a synchronic and diachronic point of view two of the procedures by which the basic valency of Old English has been assessed: computation of verbs and evaluation of the causative ja-formation. Concerning the former, it shows that the valency of whole verb classes in Old English is determined by previous processes of morphophonetic merger and cannot therefore be used as evidence for labilisation processes (transitivisation or detransitivation) taking place in OE itself. With respect to the latter, the article assesses whether the causative ja-formation is still a transitivising operation in Old English by examining the valency of all causative ja-pairs and incorporating recent research on the effectiveness of sound alternations as morphological markers. This article concludes that it is not, as it does not consistently signal an increase in valency. Rather, a tendency to labile coding is detected. In this respect, the article supports, with more conclusive evidence, previous research which advanced the same hypothesis.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All

I would like to thank the editor of the journal and the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on previous versions of the article. Special thanks to Christopher Langmuir for improving the manuscript’s English. The research for this article has been funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education (project FFI2017-83360-P) and the University of Seville (Plan Propio de Ayuda a la Investigación 2016).

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bammesberger, Alfred . 1965. Deverbative jan-Verba des Altenglischen, vergleichend mit den übrigen altgermanischen Sprachen dargestellt. PhD dissertation, University of Munich.
Bosworth, Joseph & Toller, Thomas Northcote. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary, with supplements by Toller (1922) and by A. Campbell (1972). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braune, Wilhelm & Heidermanns, Frank. 2004. Gotische Grammatik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brunner, Karl. 1965. Altenglische Grammatik, 3rd edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Extensions of diachronic typology: Mechanisms of change as the true universals. Presented at the conference Global Perspective on Human Language, Stanford University. http://greenberg-conference.stanford.edu/Bybee_Abstract.htm (accessed 15 February 2018).
Cameron, Angus, Amos, Ashley Crandell and diPaolo Healey, Antonette et al. (eds.). 2016. Dictionary of Old English: A to H online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project (DOE).
Campbell, Alistair. 1997 [1959]. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cennamo, Michela, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2011. The rise and fall of anticausative constructions in Indo-European: The context of Latin and Germanic. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
Comrie, Bernard. 2006. Transitivity pairs, markedness and diachronic stability. Linguistics 44, 303318.
diPaolo Healey, Antonette (ed.), with John Price Wilkin & Xin Xiang. 2009. Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. https://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/ (accessed 20 January 2018).
García García, Luisa. 2005. Germanische Kausativbildung: Die deverbalen jan-Verben im Gotischen (Historische Sprachforschung, Ergänzungsheft 45). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
García García, Luisa. 2012. Morphological causatives in Old English: The quest for a vanishing formation. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(1), 122148.
García García, Luisa. 2016. Derivational simplification in verbs in the Lindisfarne Gospels. In Julia Fernández Cuesta & Sara Pons (eds.), The Old English gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 189212. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
García García, Luisa. Forthcoming. Labile verbs and word order in early Middle English prose.
García García, Luisa & Narbona, Esaúl Ruiz. 2012. Labile verbs and word order in Early Middle English: An initial study. Selim 19, 5980.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 1: Method and theory, 6192. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hall, John Richard Clark & Meritt, Herbert Dean. 1970. A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993 . More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87120. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, Martin & Sims, Andrea D., 2010. Understanding morphology, 2nd edn. London: Hodder Education.
Haspelmath, Martin, Calude, Andreea, Spagnol, Michael, Narrog, Heiko & Bamyaci, Elíf. 2014. Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50(3), 587625.
Heidermanns, Frank. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hermodsson, Lars. 1952. Reflexive und intransitive Verba im aelteren Westgermanischen. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Richard M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1: The beginnings to 1066, 67167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hogg, Richard M. & Fulk, R. D.. 2011. A grammar of Old English, vol. 2: Morphology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Krahe, Hans & Meid, Wolfgang. 1969. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft, 7th edn, vol. 3: Wortbildungslehre. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kulikov, Leonid. 2009. Valency-changing categories in Indo-Aryan and Indo-European: A diachronic typological portrait of Vedic Sanskrit. In Anju Saxena & Åke Viberg (eds.), Multilingualism. Proceedings of the 23rd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics Uppsala University, 75–92. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Lass, Roger. 1994. Old English: A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luraghi, Silvia. 2012. Basic valency orientation and the middle voice in Hittite. Studies in Language 36(1), 132.
McMillion, Alan. 2006. Labile verbs in English: Their meaning, behaviour and structure. Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.
Middle English Dictionary . http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/ (accessed 27 July 2018).
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax, vol. 1: Concord, the parts of speech and the sentence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
NerthusV3. Online Lexical Database of Old English. www.nerthusproject.com/search-database
Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, David A. & Barnes, Jonathan. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2), 149211.
Ottosson, Kjartan. 2013. The anticausative and related categories in the Old Germanic languages. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on verbs, 329382. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Plank, Frans & Lahiri, Aditi. 2015. Macroscopic and microscopic typology: Basic valence orientation, more pertinacious than meets the naked eye. Linguistic Typology 19(1), 154.
Poppe, Erich. 2009. Standard average European and the Celticity of English intensifiers and reflexives: Some considerations and implications. English Language and Linguistics 13(2), 251266.
Riecke, Jörg. 1996 . Die schwachen jan-Verben des Althochdeutschen: Ein Gliederungsversuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Ringe, Don. 2006. A linguistic history of English, vol. 1: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schnieders, Marie. 1938. Die einheimischen nicht-komponierten schwachen Verben der jan-Klasse im Altnordischen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Schwert, Judith. 2001. Zur Bedeutung des -nan-Suffixes der gotischen schwachen Verben. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 123, 175210.
Seebold, Elmar. 1970. Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
Stanley, Eric. 1952-3. The chronology of r-metathesis in Old English. English and Germanic Studies (5), 103115.
Van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. Valency changes in the history of English. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1(1), 106143.
Van Gelderen, Elly. 2018. The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York: Routledge.
Visser, Frederik Theodor. 1963. An historical syntax of the English language, vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed