Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A construction of independent means: the history of the Way construction revisited

  • TERESA FANEGO (a1)

Abstract

The emergence and development of the Way construction was famously examined by Israel (1996) in a study which traced the modern form of the construction to three senses or subschemas, namely manner of motion (He stumbled his way to the front door), means of motion (He dug his way out of the prison) and incidental activity (He whistled his way out of the room). The present article moves beyond the late Middle English period – the starting point of Israel's research – and looks at the precursors of the Way construction since Old English times, as well as its interaction with the Intransitive Motion construction (IMC) (He walked into the room). By approaching the data in terms of Goldberg's typology (1997) of verb-construction relationships, which is finer-grained than Israel's tripartite division, the analysis identifies the areas of conceptual and constructional overlap that have existed between the Way construction and the IMC in the course of history, and shows that the Way construction has gradually specialised in the expression of those relations which could not be readily coded in the IMC, such as means of motion and incidental activity. The study thus seeks to contribute to a better understanding of how the constructicon, the repertory of constructions making up the grammar of a language, may change over time.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A construction of independent means: the history of the Way construction revisited
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A construction of independent means: the history of the Way construction revisited
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A construction of independent means: the history of the Way construction revisited
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Hide All
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Gildea, Spike. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smirnova, Elena, Sommerer, Lotte & Gildea, Spike (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bravo, Bartolomé, de Salas, Pedro & Requejo, Valeriano (eds.). 1795 [1590]. Thesaurus hispano-latinus utriusque linguae: verbis et phrasibus abundans. Barcinona: Excudebat Joannes Franciscus Piferrer.
B&T = Bosworth, Joseph & Toller, T. Northcote. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. 1921. Supplement by Toller, T. Northcote. 1972. Revised and enlarged addenda by Campbell, Alistair. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clare, P. G. W. (ed.). 2004 [1982]. Oxford Latin dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davies, Mark. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/ (accessed 31 January 2018).
De Smet, Hendrik, Diller, Hans-Jürgen & Tyrkkö, Jukka (comps). 2013. The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0. Leuven: KU Leuven.
DOE = Cameron, Angus, Crandell Amos, Ashley & di Paolo Healey, Antonette (eds.). 2016. Dictionary of Old English: A to H online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/index.html (accessed 28 February 2018).
Fanego, Teresa. 2012. Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 33, 2985.
Fanego, Teresa. 2017. The trolley rumbled through the tunnel: On the history of the English Intransitive Motion Construction. Folia Linguistica Historica 38, 2973.
Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul & O'Connor, Mary. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64 (3), 501–38.
Gisborne, Nikolas & Patten, Amanda. 2011. Construction Grammar and grammaticalization. In Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 92104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1997. The relationship between verbs and constructions. In Verspoor, Marjolijn, Lee, Kee Dong & Sweetser, Eve (eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning. Proceedings of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995, 383–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Höglund, Mikko & Syrjänen, Kaj. 2016. Corpus of Early American Literature. ICAME Journal 40, 1738.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. I: 1735. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huber, Judith. 2017. Motion and the English verb: A diachronic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Israel, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Goldberg, Adele E. (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–30. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MED = Kurath, Hans, Kuhn, Sherman M. & Lewis, Robert E. (eds.). 1952–2001. Middle English dictionary. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/ (accessed 28 February 2018).
Michaelis, Laura. 2003. Headless constructions and coercion by construction. In Francis, Elaine J. & Michaelis, Laura (eds.), Form–function incongruity and the architecture of grammar, 259310. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mondorf, Britta. 2011. Variation and change in English resultative constructions. Language Variation and Change 22 (3), 397421.
OED = Oxford English dictionary online. www.oed.com (accessed 28 February 2018).
Ogura, Michiko. 2002. Verbs of motion in medieval English. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Olofsson, Joel. 2014. Argument structure constructions and syntactic productivity. The case of Swedish motion constructions. Constructions 1, 117.
van Peene, J. H. 1818. Recueil ou collection de tous les verbes latins, avec des locutions appropriées à chaque verbe. Gand: Veuve Stéven.
Perek, Florent. 2016. Recent change in the productivity and schematicity of the way construction: A distributional semantic analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0014
Rohde, Ada. 2001. Analyzing Path: The interplay of verbs, prepositions and constructional semantics. PhD dissertation, Rice University.
Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist, Sven & Verhoeven, Ludo (eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. II: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–57. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Force dynamics in language and thought. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 21 (1), 293337.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. I: Concept structuring systems; vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

A construction of independent means: the history of the Way construction revisited

  • TERESA FANEGO (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.