Skip to main content

A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates1


This article offers a constructional approach to complement-taking mental predicates (CTMPs), e.g. I think, accommodating a whole class of CTMP types (i think, i suppose, i imagine etc.) and their variant forms (e.g. I would think, I should have imagined) in a constructional taxonomy. CTMPs are generally believed to depend on their prototypical simple present form in order to convey an epistemic/evidential meaning. Corpus evidence shows, however, that there exist several variant forms that equally function as interpersonal modifications. Such variation has long presented a stumbling block to studies approaching CTMPs from the point of view of grammaticalization theory, since this framework has traditionally been rather inimical to the idea that a grammaticalized item may encompass a paradigm of variant forms and instead requires internal fixation into an unalterable form. It will be argued that CTMPs should be regarded as constructions constituting a taxonomy characterized by several levels of schematicity. It will be demonstrated that the most frequently used CTMP, i think, has reached the highest degree of entrenchment and schematicity, and consequently sanctions the widest range of variant forms, which are disseminated throughout the taxonomy by virtue of analogization.

Hide All
Aijmer Karin. 1972. Some aspects of psychological predicates in English (Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis/Stockholm Studies in English 24). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Aijmer Karin. 1997. I think – an English modal particle. In Swan Toril & Westwik Olaf Jansen (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, 147. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Aijmer Karin. 2009. Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language 68, 6388.
Ariel Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barlow Michael & Kemmer Suzanne. 2000. Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Barlow Michael & Kemmer Suzanne (eds.), Usage-based models of language, vii–xxviii. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Biber Douglas, Johansson Stig, Leech Geoffrey, Conrad Susan & Finegan Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Boye Kasper & Harder Peter. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31, 569606.
Brems Lieselotte. 2007. The grammaticalization of small size nouns: Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics 35, 293325.
Brems Lieselotte, Davidse Kristin & De Smet Liesbeth. 2008. Type noun uses in the English NP: A case of right to left layering. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13, 139–68.
Brinton Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brinton Laurel J. 2008. The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bublitz Wolfram. 1992. Transferred negation and modality. Journal of Pragmatics 18, 551–77.
Butler Christopher S. & Taverniers Miriam. 2008. Layering in structural-functional grammars. Linguistics 46, 689756.
Bybee Joan L. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Joseph Brian D. & Janda Richard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bybee Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82, 711–34.
Bybee Joan L. & Hopper Paul J. (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee Joan L. & Pagliuca William. 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Ramat Anna Giacalone, Carruba Onofrio & Bernini Giuliano (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL), 109–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee Joan L., Perkins Revere & Pagliuca William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bybee Joan L. & Thompson Sandra A. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23, 378–88.
Croft William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft William 2005. Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. In Östman Jan-Ola & Fried Mirjam (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 273314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Croft William & Cruse D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words, 1990-present. Available online at
Dehé Nicole. 2009. Clausal parentheticals, intonation phrasing and prosodic theory. Journal of Linguistics 45, 569615.
Dehé Nicole & Kavalova Yordanka. 2007. Parentheticals: An introduction. In Dehé Nicole & Kavalova Yordanka (eds.), Parentheticals, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diessel Holger & Tomasello Michael. 2001. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 97141.
Fillmore Charles. 1963. The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word 19, 208–31.
Fischer Olga. 2007. The development of English parentheticals: A case of grammaticalization? In Smit Stefan Dollinger, Hüttner Julia, Kaltenböck Gunther & Lutzky Ursula (eds.), Tracing English through time: Explorations in language variation, 99114. Vienna: Braumüller.
Givón Talmy. 1991. The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Traugott Elizabeth Closs & Heine Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2 (Typological Studies in Language 19), 257310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón Talmy. 1993. English grammar: A function-based introduction, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar account of argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haiman John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In Pagliuca William (ed.), Perspectives of grammaticalization, 328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday M. A. K. 1994 [1985]. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn.London: Arnold.
Heine Bernd, Claudi Ulrike & Hünnemeyer Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heller Brooke & Howe Chad. 2008. Raising parentheticals as discourse particles. Presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 4, Leuven.
Hooper Joan B. 1975. On assertive predicates. In Kimball John P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 4, 91124. New York: Academic Press.
Hopper Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, 139–57.
Hopper Paul J. 1988. Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In Tannen Deborah (ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding, 117–36. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hopper Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott Elizabeth Closs & Heine Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1, 1735. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper Paul J. & Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ifantidou Elly. 2001. Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaltenböck Gunther. 2005. Charting the boundaries of syntax: A taxonomy of spoken parenthetical clauses. Vienna English Working Papers 14, 2153.
Kaltenböck Gunther. 2006. ‘. . . That is the question’: Complementizer omission in extraposed that-clauses. English Language and Linguistics 10, 371–96.
Kaltenböck Gunther. 2007a. Position, prosody and scope: The case of English comment clauses. Vienna English Working Papers 16 (1), 338.
Kaltenböck Gunther. 2007b. Spoken parenthetical clauses in English: A taxonomy. In Dehé Nicole & Kavalova Yordanka (eds.), Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen Elise. 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen Elise. 2007. The role of I guess in conversational stance taking. In Englebretson Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 183219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen Elise. 2009. I thought it was pretty neat: Social action formats for taking a stance. In Slembrouck Stef, Van Herreweghe Mieke & Taverniers Miriam (eds.), From will to well: Studies in linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, 293304. Ghent: Academia Press.
Kearns Kate. 2007. Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer. English Language and Linguistics 11, 475505.
Kiefer Ferenc. 1998. Modality. In Verschueren Jef, Östman Jan-Ola, Blommaert Jan & Bulcaen Chris (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kimball, John P. 1972. Cyclic and linear grammars. In Kimball John P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 1, 6380. New York: Seminar Press.
Krug Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 32). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff George. 1970 [1965]. Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt.
Lakoff Robin. 1969. A syntactic argument for negative transportation. Chicago Linguistic Society 5, 140–7.
Langacker Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker Ronald W. 2000. Grammar and conceptualization (Cognitive Linguistics Research, 14). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lehmann Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20, 303–18.
Lindholm James M. 1969. Negative-raising and sentence pronominalization. Chicago Linguistic Society 5, 148–58.
Mindt Ilka. 2003. Is I think a discourse marker? In Mengel Ewald, Schmidt Hans-Jörg & Steppat Michael (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference of the German Association of University Teachers of English 24, 473–83. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Nuyts Jan. 1993. Epistemic modal adverbs and adjectives and the layered representation of conceptual and linguistic structure. Linguistics 31, 933–69.
Östman Jan-Ola & Fried Mirjam (eds.). 2005. Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Oxford English dictionary.
Palander-Collin Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and social embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 55). Helsinki: Tome LV.
Quirk Randolph, Greenbaum Sidney, Leech Geoffrey & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rühlemann Christoph. 2007. Conversation in context: A corpus-driven approach. London: Continuum.
Scheibman Joanne. 2001. Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In Bybee Joan L. & Hopper Paul J. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 6189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Scheibman Joanne. 2002. Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schneider Stefan. 2007. Reduced parenthetical clauses as mitigators: A corpus study of spoken French, Italian and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schönefeld Doris. 2006. Constructions. Constructions Special Volume 1, (10 June 2009).
Simon-Vandenbergen Anne-Marie. 2000. The functions of I think in political discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics 10, 4163.
Stubbs Michael. 1986. A matter of prolonged fieldwork: Notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics 7, 125.
Sweetser Eve E. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 389405.
Tagliamonte Sali & Smith Jennifer. 2005. No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 9, 289309.
Taverniers Miriam. To appear. Interpersonal grammatical metaphor as double scoping and double grounding. Word.
Thompson Sandra A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26, 125–64.
Thompson Sandra A. & Mulac Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Traugott Elizabeth Closs & Heine Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2, 313–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Torres Cacoullos Rena & Walker James A.. 2009. On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that. Linguistics 47, 143.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann Winfred P. & Malkiel Yakov (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 406–16.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 1995a. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Presented at the International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL) XII, Manchester.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 1995b. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Stein Dieter & Wright Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 3154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 2005. From ideational to interpersonal: A reassessment. Presented at the FITIGRA Conference: From Ideational to Interpersonal: Perspectives from Grammaticalization, Leuven.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18, 523–57.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 2008a. The grammaticalization of NP of NP constructions. In Bergs Alexander & Diewald Gabriele (eds.), Constructions and language change, 2346. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs. 2008b. Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Eckhardt Regine, Jäger Gerhard & Veenstra Tonjes (eds.), Variation, selection, development: Probing the evolutionary model of language change, 219–50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott Elizabeth Closs & Heine Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1, 189218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale Graeme. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Traugott Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale Graeme (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 1944. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trousdale Graeme. 2008a. Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In Trousdale Graeme & Gisborne Nikolas (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 3367. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Trousdale Graeme. 2008b. Grammaticalization, constructions and the grammaticalization of constructions. Presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 4, Leuven.
Trousdale Graeme. 2008c. Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In Minkova Donka & Fitzmaurice Susan (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change, 301–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Trousdale Graeme. 2009. Degrammaticalization and Construction Grammar. Presented at Current Trends in Grammaticalization Research, Groningen.
Urmson James O. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61, 480–96.
Van Bogaert Julie. 2006. I guess, I suppose and I believe as pragmatic markers: Grammaticalization and functions. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (New Series) 4, 129–49.
Van Bogaert Julie. To appear. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Special issue of Linguistics.
Vandelanotte Lieven. 2004. Dependency, framing, scope? The syntagmatic structure of sentences of speech or thought representation. Preprints of the Department of Linguistics 211. Department of Linguistics, University of Leuven.
Vandelanotte Lieven. 2006. Speech or thought representation and subjectification, or on the need to think twice. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 20, 137–68.
Vandelanotte Lieven. To appear. Dependency, framing, scope? The syntagmatic structure of sentences of speech and thought representation. Word.
Verhagen Arie. 2001. Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. In Sanders Ted, Schilperoord Joost & Spooren Wilbert (eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psychological aspects, 337–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Verstraete Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1505–28.
Wierzbicka Anna. 2006. English: Meaning and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 173 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.