Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: sources, paths and mechanisms of change1

  • LOBKE GHESQUIÈRE (a1) and KRISTIN DAVIDSE (a1)
Abstract

This article is concerned with the sources, paths and mechanisms of change leading to noun-intensifying uses of adjectives, such as a complete mess, a whole bunch of crazy stuff, a particular threat. Such intensifying uses may develop from property-describing uses of adjectives, as discussed by Traugott (1989), Adamson (2000) and Paradis (2000, 2001, 2008). As pointed out by Bolinger (1972: 61), noun-intensifying uses may also develop from elements of the NP that have identifying functions, which can be either quantifying-identifying or identifying in the strict sense. The aim of this article is to provide a new synthesis of how these three pathways lead towards noun-intensifying meanings, focusing on the question of how the intensification scales necessary to these uses are acquired. We posit that the concepts of open and closed intensification scales (Kennedy & McNally 2005) can generalize over the intensifying uses from the three sources. The main mechanism of change is the foregrounding of the gradability mode (Paradis 2000), quantification scale or other implied scale of the immediate source uses. The initial shift takes place in collocational environments that overlap with those of the source uses. Due to later collocational extension, noun-intensifying uses may come to incorporate intensification scales unpredicted by their sources.

Copyright
References
Hide All
CB: Collins Wordbanks Online.
CLMETEV: Hendrik De Smet. 2005. The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (extended version). perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/
PPCEME: Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs. 2004. Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCEME-RELEASE-1/
PPCME2: Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edition. www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCME2-RELEASE-2/
YCOE: Taylor, Ann, A. Warren, S. Pintzuk & F. Beths. 2003. The York–Toronto– Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/YCOE/YcoeHome.htm
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 3966. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjective comparison: A semantic scale. Journal of English Linguistics 1, 210.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree words. The Hague: Mouton.
Brems, Lieselotte. 2003. Measure noun constructions: An instance of semantically-driven grammaticalization. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8, 283312.
Brems, Lieselotte. 2010. Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics 14, 83109.
Brzyk, Tom. 2008. The development of emphasizer uses in the noun phrase: A diachronic study of mere and sheer. MA dissertation, University of Leuven.
Davidse, Kristin. 1999. The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 10, 203–50.
Davidse, Kristin. 2004. The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Achard, Michel & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), Language, culture, and mind, 507–33. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17, 463–89.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions (Special volume 1: Constructions all overCase studies and theoretical implications.) www.constructionsonline.de/articles/specvol1.
Eckardt, Regine. Forthcoming. The many careers of polarity sensitive items. In Breban, Tine, Brems, Lot, Davidse, Kristin & Mortelmans, Tanja (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: Origins, criteria and outcomes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans, Nick & Wilkins, David. 2000. In the mind's ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76, 546–92.
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2009. From determining to emphasizing meanings: The adjectives of specificity. Folia Linguistica 43, 311–43.
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2010. On the subjectification and intersubjectification paths followed by the adjectives of completeness. In Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 277314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 1735. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul. 1998. Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, Michael (ed.), The new psychology of language, 155–75. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81, 345–81.
König, Ekkehard. 1989. On the historical development of focus particles. In Weydt, Harald (ed.), Sprechen mit Partikeln, 318–29. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lorenz, Gunther. 2002. Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 143–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Jim. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3, 130.
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1991. But, only, just: Focusing adverbial change in Modern English 1500–1900. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki. Helsinki: Sociéte Néophilologique.
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1994. Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 248–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
OALD: Hornby, A. S., Sally Wehmeier & Michael Ashby (eds.). 2000. Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OED: Murray, James A. H., Henry Brodly, W. A. Craigie & C. T. Onions. 1993. The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at www.oed.com.
Paradis, Carita. 2000. Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalization. In Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, Denison, David, Hogg, Richard & McCully, Christopher (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 233–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Paradis, Carita. 2001. Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 4765.
Paradis, Carita. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12, 317–43.
Paradis, Carita & Willners, Caroline. 2006. Antonymy and negation: The boundedness hypothesis. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1051–80.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Saxon, Leslie. 1990. On one's own: The semantics and pragmatics of reflexives. In Georgopoulos, Carol P. & Ishihara, Roberta L. (eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, 501–17. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sinclair, John. 1990. Collins COBUILD English grammar. London: HarperCollins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 406–16.
Vandewinkel, Sigi & Davidse, Kristin. 2008. The interlocking paths of development towards emphasizer adjective pure. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9, 255–87.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed