Skip to main content Accessibility help

Early Modern English again: a corpus study and semantic analysis

  • REMUS GERGEL (a1) and SIGRID BECK (a2)


This article investigates uses of the adverb again in Early Modern English (EModE) correspondence. The study collects occurrences of again and analyses their interpretation. It reveals interesting differences in the use of again between EModE and Late Modern English (LModE) as well as Present-day English (PDE). To bring out the grammatical significance of the results, we connect the study methodologically as closely as possible with Beck, Berezovskaya & Pflugfelder's (2009) study of LModE/PDE correspondence. We show that the key diachronic alteration we observe when considering EModE is not just numerical in nature but also qualitatively distinct from the later change at the transition between LModE and PDE. At the heart of our proposal is the finding that while a structural approach to again (Rapp & von Stechow 1999; Beck 2005) is successful for characterizing the transition between LModE and PDE, a uniform analysis for the entire diachronic trajectory is not warranted; a combined theoretical modelling is required instead. Specifically, a lexical analysis relying on counterdirectionality (e.g. Fabricius-Hansen 2001) is required to capture the differences in the EModE data.



Hide All
Beck, Sigrid. 2005. There and back again: A semantic analysis. Journal of Semantics 22, 351.
Beck, Sigrid. 2012. Pluractional comparisons. Linguistics and Philosophy 35, 57110.
Beck, Sigrid, Berezovskaya, Polina & Pflugfelder, Katja. 2009. The use of ‘again’ in 19th-century English versus Present-day English. Syntax 12, 193214.
Cresswell, M. 1978. Prepositions and points of view. Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 141.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Wischer & Diewald (eds.), 102–20.
Dowty, David. 1972. Studies in the logic of verb aspect and time reference in English. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckardt, Regine. 2012. Grammaticalization and semantic reanalysis. In von Heusinger, Klaus, Maienborn, Claudia & Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 2675–702. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Elenbaas, Marion. 2007. The synchronic and diachronic syntax of the English verb–particle combination. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen (LOT Dissertations 149).
Evans, Nicholas & Wilkins, David. 2000. In the mind's ear: the semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76, 546–92.
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine. 2001. Wi(e)der and again(st). In Fery, Caroline & Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 101–30. Berlin: Akademie.
Harding, Denys W. 1976. Words into rhythm: English speech rhythm in verse and prose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Wischer & Diewald (eds.), 83–101.
Jäger, Gerhard & Blutner, Reinhart. 2000. Against lexical decomposition in syntax. In Wyner, Adam Zachary (ed.), Proceedings of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics 15, 113–37.
Krifka, Manfred. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), Events and grammar, 197235. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1, 199244.
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb-meaning and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rapp, Irene & von Stechow, Arnim. 1999. Fast ‘almost’ and the visibility parameter for functional adverbs. Journal of Semantics 16, 149204.
Snyder, William. 2001. On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language 77, 324–42.
Stechow, Arnim von. 1995. Lexical decomposition in syntax. In Egli, Urs, Pause, Peter E., Schwarze, Christoph, von Stechow, Arnim & Wienhold, Götz (eds.), The lexicon in the organization of language, 81118. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stechow, Arnim von. 1996. The different readings of wieder ‘again’: A structural account. Journal of Semantics 13, 87138.
Taylor, Ann, Nurmi, Arja, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. York: University of York and Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Oxford Text Archive.
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. The York–Toronto–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. Oxford Text Archive.
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1972. On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.) 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Early Modern English again: a corpus study and semantic analysis

  • REMUS GERGEL (a1) and SIGRID BECK (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.