Skip to main content
×
×
Home

‘Flip-flop’ and mergers-in-progress1

  • LAUREN HALL-LEW (a1)
Abstract

During a merger-in-progress, occasionally one or two speakers will exhibit an unusual phonological pattern reminiscent of flip-flop (Labov et al. 1972). In such cases, the merging vowels appear to move past the point of coalescence in at least one phonetic dimension; difference is maintained but the vowel quality is opposite to the historical pattern on one or both dimensions. Flip-flop between the cot and caught vowels occurs for two speakers in a recent sample from San Francisco, California. The community shows robust change in progress toward a lower and fronter caught vowel nucleus, and no change in apparent time for cot. Further analysis shows that this is leading to a change in apparent time toward merger, and that the rate of vowel convergence is stronger among Chinese Americans than European Americans. The two speakers who produce flip-flop are seen to represent a key transitional generation with respect to the ethnic identity of the neighborhood, where flip-flop may be but one linguistic consequence of a lifetime of active negotiation between conflicting local meanings. The analysis suggests that ethnographic detail and attention to individual outliers allows for more comprehensive models of the range of phenomena associated with vowel mergers.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
1

The first version of this work was presented at the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE), in June 2011, on the panel ‘Mergers in English: perspectives from phonology, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics’, organized by Lynn Clark, Warren Maguire and Kevin Watson. I extend my thanks to them for organizing the workshop and this special issue. A second version was presented at the Department of Linguistics at Queen Mary, University of London, in January 2012, and I thank that audience for their valuable feedback. I am indebted to the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their detailed and insightful observations. Thanks to Jennifer Nycz, Kevin Stadler, Helen West and Amy Wong for useful discussions. The speakers whose voices are analyzed here receive my greatest debt of gratitude.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Baayen, R. H. 2010. languageR: Data sets and functions with ‘Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics’. R package version 1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR.
Bloch, Matthew, Carter, Shan & McLean, Alan. 2011. Mapping the 2010 US Census. The New York Times. http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/map. Accessed 13 December 2011.
Boberg, Charles. 1999. The attitudinal component of variant in American English foreign (a) nativization. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18, 4961.
Boberg, Charles. 2009. The emergence of a new phoneme: Foreign (a) in Canadian English. Language Variation and Change 12, 355–80.
Boberg, Charles. 2010. The English language in Canada: Status, history and comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2012. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 5.3.04. Retrieved 12 January 2012 from www.praat.org.
Bucholtz, Mary. 2003. Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (3), 398416.
Coupland, Nikolas. 2003. Sociolinguistic authenticities. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (3), 417–31.
DeCamp, David. 1953. The pronunciation of English in San Francisco. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
DeCamp, David. 1959. The pronunciation of English in San Francisco (part 2). Orbis 5477.
DeCamp, David. 1972. Hypercorrection and rule generalization. Language in Society 1 (1), 8790.
Di Paolo, Marianna. 1992. Hypercorrection in response to the apparent merger of (oh) and (a) in Utah English. Language and Communication 12, 267–92.
Di Paolo, Marianna, Yaeger-Dror, Malcah & Wassink, Alicia Beckford. 2011. Analyzing vowels. In Di Paolo, Marianna & Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (eds.), Sociophonetics: A student's guide, 87106. London and New York: Routledge.
Drager, Katie & Hay, Jennifer. 2012. Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 24, 5978.
Eberhardt, Maeve. 2008. The low-back merger in the Steel City: African American English in Pittsburgh. American Speech 83, 284311.
Eckert, Penelope. 2003. Sociolinguistics and authenticity: An elephant in the room. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7 (3), 392–7.
Eckert, Penelope 2008a. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 453–76.
Eckert, Penelope. 2008b. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12, 2542.
Fabricius, Anne H., Watt, Dominic & Ezra Johnson, Daniel. 2009. A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalization algorithms for sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 21, 413–35.
Fridland, Valerie. 2004. The spread of the cot/caught merger: A look at region and race. Paper presented at NWAV33, Ann Arbor, MI.
Godfrey, Brian J. 1988. Neighborhoods in transition: The making of San Francisco's ethnic and nonconformist communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gordon, Matthew. 2006. Tracking the low back merger in Missouri. In Murray, Thomas E. & Simon, Beth Lee (eds.), Language variation and change in the American Midland: A new look at ‘Heartland’ English, 5768. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2009. Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2010. Improved representation of variance in measures of vowel merger. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics (POMA), 9 (1).
Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2011. The completion of a sound change in California English. Proceedings of ICPhS XVII. [CD-ROM]
Hall-Lew, Lauren. Forthcoming. Chinese social practice and San Francisco authenticity. In Véronique Lacoste, Jakob Leimgruber & Thiemo Breyer (eds.), Indexing authenticity: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Hall-Lew, Lauren. Under review. ‘I went to school back East. . . in Berkeley’: San Francisco English and changes in authenticity. In H. Samy Alim, Patricia Baquedano-Lopez, Mary Bucholtz & Dolores Ines Casillas (eds.), Vox California: Cultural meanings of linguistic diversity.
Herold, Ruth. 1997. Solving the actuation problem: Merger and immigration in eastern Pennsylvania. Language Variation and Change 9, 165–89.
Hinton, Leanne, Bremner, Sue, Corcoran, Hazel, Learner, Jean, Luthin, Herb, Moonwomon, Birch & Van Clay, Mary. 1987. It's not just Valley Girls: A study of California English. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, 117–27.
Ito, Rika. 2010. Accommodation to the local majority norm by Hmong Americans in the Twin Cities, Minnesota. American Speech 85 (2), 141–62.
Irons, Terry Lynn. 2007. On the status of low back vowels in Kentucky English: More evidence of merger. Language Variation and Change 19, 137–80.
Irvine, Judith & Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 3584.
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2007. Stability and change along a dialect boundary: The low vowels of Southeastern New England. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Kurath, Hans & McDavid, Raven I.. 1961. The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic states [PEAS]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William. 1998. The three dialects of English. In Linn, M. D. (ed.), Handbook of dialects and language variation, 3981. San Diego: Academic Press.
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83, 344–87.
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William, Karen, Mark & Miller, Corey. 1991. Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. Language Variation and Change 3, 3374.
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah & Steiner, Richard. 1972. A quantitative study of sound change in progress: Report on National Science Foundation Contract GS-3287. Philadelphia: US Regional Survey.
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. New York and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Laguerre, Michel S. 2005. The globalization of a panethnopolis: Richmond District as the New Chinatown in San Francisco. Geojournal 64, 41–9.
Majors, Tivoli. 2005. Low back vowel merger in Missouri speech: Acoustic description and explanation. American Speech 80, 165–79.
McCall, Leslie. 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs 30, 17711800.
Moonwomon, Birch. 1991. Sound change in San Francisco English. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38, 447–85.
Nycz, Jennifer. 2005. The dynamics of near-merger in accommodation. In Blaho, Sylvia, Vicente, Luis & Schoorlemmer, Erik (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XIII, 273–86.
Nycz, Jennifer. 2011. Second dialect acquisition: Implications for theories of phonological representation. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Pederson, Lee. 2001. Dialects. In Algeo, John (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 6: English in North America, 253–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plichta, Bartlomiej. 2006. Akustyk: A free Praat plug-in for sociolinguists. http://bartus.org/akustyk/.
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, www.R-project.org.
Rauniomaa, Mirka. 2003. Stance accretion. Paper presented at the Language, Interaction, and Social Organization Research Focus Group, University of California, Santa Barbara, February.
Sharma, Devyani. 2011. Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15 (4), 464–92.
Terrell, Tracy. 1975. The merger of the low vowel phonemes in the English of Southern California: A preliminary report. Paper presented at the American Dialect Society.
Thomas, Erik R. 2011. Sociophonetics: An introduction. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thomas, Erik R. & Kendall, Tyler, 2007. NORM: The Vowel Normalization and Plotting Suite: An online tool for sociophonetic vowel normalization. http://NCSLAAP.lib.NCSU.edu/Tools/NORM./ Accessed: 4 December 2012.
Ungaretti, Lorri. 2012. Stories in the sand: San Francisco's Sunset District, 1847–1964. San Francisco: Balangero Books.
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, Amy Wing-mei. 2012. The lowering of raised-thought and the low-back distinction in New York City: Evidence from Chinese Americans. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 40 18 (2), 157–66.
Wong, Amy & Hall-Lew, Lauren. Under review. Regional variability and ethnic identity: Chinese Americans in San Francisco and New York City. In Malcah Yaeger-Dror & Lauren Hall-Lew (eds.), New perspectives on the concept of ethnolect.
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah, Hall-Lew, Lauren & Deckert, Sharon. 2003. Situational variation in intonational strategies. In Leistyna, P. & Meyer, C. (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, 209–24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Yu, Alan. 2007. Understanding near mergers: The case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology 24, 187214.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed