Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Genitive coordinations with personal pronouns1

  • JOHN PAYNE (a1)
Abstract

English genitive noun-phrase coordinations follow two patterns. The first is the single genitive, in which exponence of the genitive case occurs solely on the final coordinate, e.g. Mary and Jane's; and the second is the multiple genitive, in which exponence of the genitive case occurs on all coordinates, e.g. Mary's and Jane's. When either of the coordinates is a personal pronoun, difficult choices have to be made about the form of the pronoun. These difficulties arise especially with the single genitive, which is judged to be totally ungrammatical in coordinations like *my wife and I's or *my wife and my. On the other hand, the alternative use of the multiple genitive, my wife's and my, conflicts with a preference for the single genitive when the coordinates are felt to constitute a single unit. In this article, we first conduct a corpus-based analysis for genitive coordinations with personal pronouns, based on the British National Corpus. This, supplemented by some non-standard examples from web-based sources, gives some insight into the choices actually made by native speakers. We then provide a theoretical account of the syntactic problems that genitive coordinations with pronouns create. This account is shown to be compatible solely with an analysis of the English ’s genitive as an inflectional affix.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Allen, Cynthia. 1997. The origins of the ‘group genitive’ in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95, 111–31.
Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Payne, John. 2011. There are no special clitics. In Galani, Alexandra, Hicks, Glyn & Tsoulas, George (eds.), Morphology and its interfaces, 147–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cooper, William E. & Ross, John R.. 1975. World order. In Grossman, Robin E., San, L. James & Vance, Timothy J. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on Functionalism, 63111. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Curme, George O. 1931. Syntax. Boston: Heath.
Denison, David, Scott, Alan & Börjars, Kersti. 2010. The real distribution of the English ‘group genitive’. Studies in Language 34, 532–64.
Gast, V. 2006. The grammar of identity: Intensifiers and reflexives in Germanic languages. London: Routledge.
Herriman, Jennifer. 1999. Coordinating genitives in determinative function in English. Studia Neophilologica 71, 112.
Huddleston, Rodney, Payne, John & Peterson, Peter. 2002. Coordination and supplementation. In Huddleston & Pullum et al., 1273–362.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2005. A student's introduction to English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1894. Progress in language: With special reference to English. London: Sonnenschein.
Jespersen, Otto. 1914. A modern English grammar on historical principles, part II: Syntax. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
König, Ekkehard. 2001. Intensifiers and reflexives. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf & Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook of contemporary research, 747–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kruisinga, E. 1922. A handbook of Present-day English, vol. II: English accidence and syntax, 3rd edn.Groningen: Noordhoff.
Löbner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 4, 279326.
Miller, Philip H. & Halpern, Aaron L.. 1993. English possessives and the syntax of morphological features. In Stvan, Lauren Smith et al. . (eds.), FLSM III: Papers from the third annual meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica, 219–34. Bloomington IN.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Huddleston & Pullum et al., 323–523.
Payne, John. 2009. The English genitive and double case. Transactions of the Philological Society 107, 322–57.
Plank, Frans. 1992. From cases to adpositions. In Pantaleo, Nicola (ed.), Aspects of English diachronic linguistics: Papers read at the Second National Conference on the History of English, Naples, 28–29 April 1989, 1961. Fasano: Schena.
Rosenbach, Anette. 2004. The English s-genitive: A case of degrammaticalization? In Fischer, Olga, Norde, Muriel & Perridon, Harry (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 7396. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1987. Suppressing the Z's. Journal of Linguistics 23 (1), 133–48.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 2006. Overpossessive. Language Log, 21 November.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed