Skip to main content Accessibility help

Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use


Many discussions of grammatical change have focused on grammatical innovation in the discourse contexts of conversational interaction. We argue here that it is also possible for grammatical innovation to emerge out of the communicative demands of written discourse. In particular, the distinctive communicative characteristics of academic writing (informational prose) have led to the development of a discourse style that relies heavily on nominal structures, with extensive phrasal modification and a relative absence of verbs. By tracking the historical development of this discourse style, we can also observe the development of particular grammatical functions that are emerging in writing. We focus here on two grammatical features – nouns as nominal premodifiers and prepositional phrases as nominal postmodifiers – analyzing their historical development over the last four centuries in a corpus of academic research writing (compared to other registers such as fiction, newspaper reportage and conversation). Our analysis shows that these grammatical features were quite restricted in function and variability in earlier historical periods of English. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, they became much more frequent and productive, accompanied by major extensions in their functions, variants, and range of lexical associations. These extensions were restricted primarily to informational written discourse, illustrating ways in which new grammatical functions emerge in writing rather than speech.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use
      Available formats
Hide All
Corpus of 20th century research articles, compiled by Bethany Gray (Northern Arizona University).
Corpus of historical fiction, compiled by Bethany Gray (Northern Arizona University).
A representative corpus of historical English registers (ARCHER). 1992. ARCHER1 compiled by Douglas Biber (Northern Arizona University) and Edward Finegan (University of Southern California).
Corpus of English texts on astronomy (CETA), compiled by the Research Group for Multidimensional Corpus-Based Studies in English (MUStE) at the University of A Coruña, Spain.
Longman spoken and written English corpus, see Biber et al. 1999: 24–35.
Oxford English dictionary (OED). 2009. Oxford University Press. Accessed as a searchable corpus at
Banks, David. 2008. The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.
Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, Douglas. 2009. Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In Olson, David R. & Torrance, Nancy (eds.), Cambridge handbook of literacy, 7591. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas & Clark, Victoria. 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In Fanego, Teresa, López-Couso, María José & Pérez-Guerra, Javier (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology, 4366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in changing English in honor of Matti Rissanen, 253–76. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. [reprinted in Conrad and Biber 2001, 66–83]
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 220.
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany, Honkapohja, Alpo & Pahta, Päivi. 2011. Prepositional modifiers in early English medical prose: A study on their historical development in noun phrases. In Pahta, Päivi & Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Communicating early English manuscripts, 197211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.
Fox, Barbara. 2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices. Discourse Studies 9, 299318.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1979. Differences between spoken and written language: Some implications for language teaching. In Page, Glenda et al. . (eds.), Communication through reading: Proceedings of the 4th Australian reading conference, 3752. Adelaide: Australian Reading Association.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R.. 1993/1996. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kemmer, Suzanne & Barlow, Michael. 2000. Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Barlow & Kemmer (eds.), vii–xxviii.
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammer. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow & Kemmer (eds.), 1–64.
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, variation and standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, Charles. 1992. Apposition in contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nevalinna, Saara & Pahta, Päivi. 1997. Middle English nonrestrictive expository apposition with an explicit marker. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Studies in Middle English linguistics, 373402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.). 1996. Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pahta, Päivi & Nevalinna, Saara. 1997. Re-phrasing in Early English: The use of expository apposition with an explicit marker from 1350 to 1710. In Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja & Heikkonen, Kirsi (eds.), English in transition: Corpus-based studies in linguistic variation and genre styles, 121–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1991. The noun phrase in early sixteenth-century English: A study based on Sir Thomas More's writings. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Rosenbach, Anette. 2007. Emerging variation: Determiner genitives and noun modifiers in English. English Language and Linguistics 11, 143–89.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, & Hinrichs, Lars. 2008. Probabilistic determinants of genitive variation in spoken and written English: A multivariate comparison across time, space, and genres. In Terttu, Nevalainen, Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi & Korhonen, Minna (eds.), The dynamics of linguistic variation: Corpus evidence on English past and present, 291309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2004. Have to, gotta, must: Grammaticalisation, variation and specialization in English deontic modality. In Lindquist, Hans & Mair, Christian (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 3355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed