Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

New contrast acquisition: methodological issues and theoretical implications

  • JENNIFER NYCZ (a1)
Abstract

This article presents data on the acquisition of the low back vowel contrast by native speakers of Canadian English who have moved as adults to the New York City region, examining how these speakers who natively possess a single low back vowel category have acquired the low back vowel distinction of the new ambient dialect. The speakers show remarkable first dialect stability with respect to their low back vowel system, even after many years of new dialect exposure: in minimal pair contexts, nearly all of the speakers continue to produce and perceive a single vowel category. However, in word list and conversational contexts, the majority of speakers exhibit a small but significant phonetic difference between words like cot and caught, reflecting the separation of these word classes in the new dialect to which they are exposed; moreover, the realization of these words shows frequency effects consistent with a lexically gradual divergence of the two vowels. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for theories of phonological representation and change, as well as their methodological implications for the study of mergers- and splits-in-progress.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Archangeli, Diana. 1988. Apects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5, 183207.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. Harald, Piepenbrock, Richard & van Rijn, Hedderik. 1993. The CELEX lexical database. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Bates, Douglas & Sarkar, Deepayan. 2008. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using s4 classes. http://cran.r-project.org.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1926. A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2 (3), 153–64.
Boberg, Charles. 2008. English in Canada: Phonology. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English: The Americas and the Caribbean, vol. 2, 144–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Church, Barbara A. & Schacter, Daniel L.. 1994. Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 521–33.
Clark, Lynn & Trousdale, Graeme. 2009. The role of frequency in phonological change: Evidence from TH-fronting in east-central Scotland. English Language and Linguistics 13 (1), 3355.
Clements, George N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–52.
Clements, George N. & Hume, Elizabeth. 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. In Goldsmith, John A. (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 245306. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Cole, Ronald A., Coltheart, Max & Allard, Fran. 1974. Memory of a speaker's voice: Reaction time to same- or different-voiced letters. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 26, 17.
Gafos, Adamantios. 2002. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 269–33.
Goldinger, Stephen D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105, 251–79.
Goldsmith, John A. 1979. The aims of autosegmental phonology. In Dinnsen, Daniel A. (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory, 202–22. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Herzog, Marvin. 1965. The Yiddish language in northern Poland. Bloomington and The Hague: Mouton & Co.
Hintzman, Douglas L. 1986. ‘Schema abstraction’ in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93, 411–28.
Hintzman, Douglas L., Block, Richard A. & Inskeep, Norman R.. 1972. Memory for mode of input. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 741–9.
Jakobson, Roman. 1962. Selected writings, vol. 1. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2010. Stability and change along a dialect boundary: The low vowels of southeastern New England. Publications of the American Dialect Society 95. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization. In Johnson, Keith & Mullennix, John W. (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing, 145–66. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kučera, Henry & Francis, W. Nelson. 1967. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1st edition.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of linguistic change: Cognitive and cultural factors. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change: A multimedia reference tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Labov, William, Karen, Mark & Miller, Corey. 1991. Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. Language Variation and Change 3, 3374.
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah & Steiner, Richard. 1972. A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia, PA: US Regional Survey.
Ladefoged, Peter. 2003. Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Susanne (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 163. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Malkiel, Yakov. 1967. Every word has its own history. Glossa 1, 137–49.
Mullennix, John W., Pisoni, David B. & Martin, Christopher S.. 1988. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85, 365–78.
Norris, Dennis, McQueen, James & Cutler, Anne. 2003. Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology 47, 204–38.
Nygaard, Lynne C. & Pisoni, David B.. 1998. Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 60, 355–76.
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer. [English translation of 2nd (1886) edition: Principles of the history of language, trans. H. A. Strong. College Park: McGrath Publishing Company, 1970.]
Phillips, Betty S. 1984. Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language 60, 320–42.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul J. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 137–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Laboratory phonology 7, 101–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2003. Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.), Probabilistic linguistics, 177228. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2006. The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics 34, 516–30.
Pinheiro, Jose C. & Bates, Douglas M.. 2000. Mixed-effect models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Schacter, Daniel L. & Church, Barbara A.. 1992. Auditory priming: Implicit and explicit memory for words and voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18, 915–30.
Steriade, Donca. 1995. Underspecification and markedness. In Goldsmith, John A. (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell: 114–75.
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1969. Principles of phonology, trans. Christiane A. M. Baltaxe. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Originally published 1939 as Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Trudgill, Peter & Foxcroft, Nina. 1978. On the sociolinguistics of vocalic mergers: Transfer and approximation in East Anglia. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 6979. London: Edwin Arnold.
Vaux, Bert & Cooper, Justin. 1999. Introduction to linguistic field methods. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Wedel, Andrew. 2004. Category competition drives contrast maintenance within an exemplar-based production/perception loop. In Goldsmith, John A. & Wicentowski, Richard (eds.), Proceedings of the seventh meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology, vol. 7, 110. ACL.
Wedel, Andrew. 2006. Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review 23, 247–74.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed