Skip to main content
×
×
Home

On the givenness of OV word order: a (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English

  • TARA STRUIK (a1) and ANS VAN KEMENADE (a1)
Abstract

OV/VO variation in the history of English has been a long-debated issue. Where earlier approaches were concerned with the grammatical status of the variation (see van Kemenade 1987; Pintzuk 1999 and many others), the debate has shifted more recently to explaining the variation from a pragmatic perspective (see Bech 2001; Taylor & Pintzuk 2012a), focusing on the given-before-new hypothesis (Gundel 1988) and its consequences for OV/VO. While the work by Taylor & Pintzuk (2012a) focuses specifically on the newness of VO orders, the present study is particularly concerned with the givenness of OV word order. It is hypothesized that OV orders are the result of leftward movement from VO orders, triggered by givenness. A corpus study on a database of subclauses with two verbs and a direct object, collected from the YCOE (Taylor et al.2003) corpus, and subsequent multinomial regression analysis within a generalized linear mixed model shows that OV word order is reserved for given objects, while VO objects are much more mixed in terms of information structure. We argue that these results are more in line with an analysis which derives all occurring word orders from a VO base than an analysis which proposes the opposite.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the givenness of OV word order: a (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the givenness of OV word order: a (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the givenness of OV word order: a (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Footnotes
Hide All
1

We thank Olaf Koeneman and Peter de Swart, two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their comments on an earlier version of this article. We are also grateful to the audiences at SHES15 and the From Sentence Grammar to Discourse Grammar Workshop, held in Nijmegen in October 2017, for their comments on parts of this work.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Baayen, Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bech, Kristin. 2001. Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.
Bech, Kristin & Eide, Kristine Gunn (eds.). 2014. Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Behagel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25, 110142.
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders & Roberts, Ian. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2), 169225.
Biberauer, Theresa, Newton, Glenda & Sheehan, Michelle. 2009. The final-over-final constraint and predictions for diachronic change. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 31. https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6091
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2005. Changing EPP-parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 9(1), 546.
Biberauer, Theresa & van Kemenade, Ans. 2011. Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10, 1769.
Birner, Betty J. 2006. Inferential relations and noncanonical word order. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory L. Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 3151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blom, Corrien. 2002. Word order in Middle Dutch: The interpretation of different types of data. In Hans Broekhuis & Paula Fikkert (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 19, 1324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cichosz, Anna, Gaszewski, Jerzy & Pęzik, Piotr. 2017. Element order in Old English and Old High German translations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Clemoes, Peter. 1966. Ælfric. In E. G. Stanley (ed.), Continuations and beginnings: Studies in Old English literature, 176209. London: Nelson.
Danckaert, Lieven. 2015. Studying word order changes in Latin, some methodological remarks. In Carlotta Viti (ed.), Perspectives on historical syntax, 233250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Danckaert, Lieven. 2017. The development of Latin clause structure: A study of the extended verb phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunbar, Richard. 1979. Discourse pragmatics and subordinate clause word order in German: An explanation of related main clause phenomena in German and English clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
Elenbaas, Marion & van Kemenade, Ans. 2014. Verb particles and OV/VO in the history of English. Studia Linguistica 68(1), 140167.
Fries, Charles C. 1940. On the development of the structural use of word-order in Modern English. Language 16(3), 199208.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora 10(1), 95125.
Gundel, Jeanette. 1988. Universals of topic–comment structure. In Michael Hammond, Edith A. Moravscik & Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 209242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2), 274307.
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karttunen, Lauro. 1976. Discourse referents. In J. D. McCawley (ed.), Notes from the linguistic underground (Syntax and Semantics 7), 363385. New York: Academic Press.
Komen, Erwin. 2011a. Cesax. Nijmegen: Radboud University. http://erwinkomen.ruhosting.nl/software/Cesax/
Komen, Erwin. 2011b. CorpusStudio. Nijmegen: Radboud University. http:// erwinkomen.ruhosting.nl/software/CorpusStudio/
Komen, Erwin. 2013. Finding focus: A study of the historical development of focus in English. PhD dissertation, Radboud University.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.). 2012. The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Petrova, Svetlana. 2009. Information structure and word order variation in the Old High German Tatian. In Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds.), Information structure and language change, 251279. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Petrova, Svetlana. 2012. The impact of focusing and defocusing on word order: Changes at the periphery in Old English and Old High German. In Nevalainen & Traugott (eds.), 846–58. Petrova, Svetlana & Augustin Speyer. 2011. Focus movement and focus interpretation in Old English. Lingua 121(11), 1751–65.
Pintzuk, Susan. 1996. Old English verb–complement word order and the change from OV to VO. York Papers in Linguistics 17, 241264.
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.
Pintzuk, Susan. 2002. Verb–object order in Old English: Variation as grammatical competition. In David Lightfoot (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological case, 276299. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pintzuk, Susan. 2005. Arguments against a universal base: Evidence from Old English. English Language and Linguistics 9(1), 115138.
Pintzuk, Susan & Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in the Old English of Beowulf . Language Variation and Change 1(2), 115143.
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann. 2004. Objects in Old English: Why and how Early English is not Icelandic. York Papers In Linguistics 2(1), 137150.
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann. 2006. The loss of OV in the history of English. In van Kemenade & Los (eds.), 249–78.
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223256. New York: Academic Press.
Sato, Kiriko. 2012. Ælfric’s linguistic and stylistic alterations in his adaptations from the Old English. Boethius. Neophilologus 96, 631640.
Sheehan, Michelle, Biberauer, Theresa, Roberts, Ian & Holmberg, Anders. 2017. The final-over-final condition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2004. On operationalizing syntactic complexity. In Gérard Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon & Anne Dister (eds.), Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis, 1032–9. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2012a. Rethinking the OV/VO alternation in Old English: The effect of complexity, grammatical weight and information status. In Nevalainen & Traugott (eds.), 1199–213.
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2012b. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2(12a), 2952.
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2014. Testing the theory: Information structure in Old English. In Bech & Eide (eds.), 53–77.
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. The York–Toronto–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. York: University of York.
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou. 2006. Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In van Kemenade & Los (eds.), 224–48.
van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou (eds.). 2006. The handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Kemenade, Ans & Milicev, Tanja. 2011. Syntax and discourse in Old English and Middle English word order. In Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, 239255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walkden, George. 2014. Object position and Heavy NP Shift in Old Saxon and beyond. In Bech & Eide (eds.), 313–40.
Wallenberg, Joel C. 2009. Antisymmetry and the conservation of C-Command: Scrambling and phrase structure in synchronic and diachronic perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed