Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Preposition copying and pruning in present-day English

  • ANDREW RADFORD (a1), CLAUDIA FELSER (a2) and OLIVER BOXELL (a2)

Abstract

This article investigates the nature of preposition copying and preposition pruning structures in present-day English. We begin by illustrating the two phenomena and consider how they might be accounted for in syntactic terms, and go on to explore the possibility that preposition copying and pruning arise for processing reasons. We then report on two acceptability judgement experiments examining the extent to which native speakers of English are sensitive to these types of ‘error’ in language comprehension. Our results indicate that preposition copying creates redundancy rather than ungrammaticality, whereas preposition pruning creates processing problems for comprehenders that may render it unacceptable in timed (but not necessarily in untimed) judgement tasks. Our findings furthermore illustrate the usefulness of combining corpus studies and experimentally elicited data for gaining a clearer picture of usage and acceptability, and the potential benefits of examining syntactic phenomena from both a theoretical and a processing perspective.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality and adposition stranding. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Alami, Lahcen. In prep. Word order, agreement and resumption in the Tashelhit variety of Berber. PhD dissertation, University of Essex.
Arnold, Jennifer, Wasow, Thomas, Asudeh, Ash & Alrenga, Peter. 2004. Avoiding attachment ambiguities: The role of constituent ordering. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 5570.
Barbiers, Sjef, Koeneman, Olaf & Lekakou, Marika. 2008. Syntactic doubling and the structure of chains. In Chang, Charles B. & Haynie, Hannah J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings, 7786.
Blackwell, Arshavir, Bates, Elizabeth & Fisher, Dan. 1996. The time course of grammaticality judgment. Language and Cognitive Processes 11, 337406.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1961. Syntactic blends and other matters. Language 37, 366–81.
Bošković, Željko. 2001. On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Camacho, Juan. 2002. Wh-doubling: Implications for the syntax of wh-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 157–64.
Cheng, Lisa. 2007. Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. In Corver, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo (eds.), The copy theory of movement, 151–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos P. & Zubizaretta, María-Luisa (eds), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Coppock, Elizabeth. 2010. Parallel encoding of alternatives in sentence production: Evidence from syntactic blends. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 3849.
Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Duffield, Nigel, Matsuo, Ayumi & Roberts, Leah. 2007. Acceptable ungrammaticality in sentence matching. Second Language Research 23, 155–77.
Felser, Claudia. 2004. Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity. Lingua 114, 543–74.
Fleischer, Jürg. 2002. Preposition stranding in German dialects. In Barbiers, Sjef, Cornips, Leonie & van der Kleij, Susanne (eds.), Syntactic microvariation. Online proceedings – Workshop on Syntactic Microvariation. 30–31 August 2000, 116–51. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.
Forster, Ken & Forster, Jonathan. 2003. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 35, 116–24.
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Syntactic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 175.
Glaser, Elvira & Frey, Natascha. 2007. Doubling phenomena in Swiss German dialects. In Barbiers, Sjef, van der Ham, Margreet & Lekakou, Marika (eds.), European dialect syntax project: Papers presented at the Workshop on Syntactic Doubling. Amsterdam, March 2006. www.meertens.knaw.nl/projecten/edisyn.
Gries, Stefan. 2002. Preposition stranding in English: Predicting speakers’ behaviour. In Samiian, Vida (ed.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics, vol. 12, California State University, Fresno, CA, 230–41.
Hofmeister, Philip, Jaeger, T. Florian, Sag, Ivan A., Arnon, Inbal & Snider, Neal. 2007. Locality and accessibility in wh-questions. In Featherston, Samuel & Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hornstein, Norbert & Weinberg, Amy. 1981. Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 5591.
Langendoen, D. Terence & Bever, Thomas G.. 1973. Can a not unhappy man be called a not sad one? In Anderson, Stephen R. & Kiparsky, Paul (eds.). A festschrift for Morris Halle, 392409. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Langendoen, D. Terence. 1979. The role of grammar in the use of language. In Aaronson, Doris and Rieber, Robert W. (eds.), Psycholinguistic research: Applications and implications, 229–40. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Myers, James. 2008. Syntactic judgment experiments. Language and Linguistics Compass 3, 406–23.
Wörterbuch, Niedersächsisches. Ed. Dieter Stellmacher. Institut für Historische Landesforschung der Universität Göttingen, Arbeitsstelle Niedersächsisches Wörterbuch. Bd. 4: F/V. Bearbeitet von Ulrich Scheuermann. Neumünster: Wachholtz Verlag 1994.
Nunes, Jairo. 1995. The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the Minimalist Program. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nykiel, Joanna. 2010. Competence, performance and extra prepositions. Journal of English Linguistics 38, 143–66.
Ouhalla, Jamal. 2005. Clitic-placement, grammaticalization and reanalysis. In Cinque, Guglielmo & Kayne, Richard (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. 607–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2007. Could preposition doubling be headed our way? Language Log, 15 May 2007. http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004498.html, accessed on 10/07/2011.
Radford, Andrew. 2009. Analysing English sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Radford, Andrew. 2010a. Real relatives: The syntax of relative clauses in live radio and TV broadcasts. Paper presented at the Essex Which Hunt conference, 4 June 2010.
Radford, Andrew. 2010b. The syntax of wh-clauses in live radio and TV broadcasts. Paper presented at the Generative Grammar in the 21st Century conference, University of Essex, 7 July 2010.
Radford, Andrew & Felser, Claudia. 2011. On preposition copying and preposition pruning in wh-clauses in English. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 60.2, Dept of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.
Reintges, Chris H., Philip, LeSourd & Chung, Sandra. 2006. Movement, wh-agreement and apparent wh-in-situ. In Cheng, Lisa & Corver, Norbert (eds.), Wh-Movement: Moving on, 165–94. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativised minimality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Sato, Mikako. 2007. Sensitivity to syntactic and semantic information in second language sentence processing. PhD dissertation, University of Essex.
Schütze, Carson. 1996. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sobin, Nicholas. 1997. Agreement, default rules and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 318–43.
Staum, Laura & Sag, Ivan A. 2008. Antilocality in ungrammaticality: Nonlocal grammaticality violations are easier to process. Poster presented at CUNY 2008 in Chapel Hill, NC.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 2002. I wonder what kind of construction that this example illustrates. In Beaver, David I., Martínez, Louis D. Casillas, Clark, Brady Z. & Kaufmann, Stefan (eds.), The construction of meaning, 219–48. Chicago: CSLI Publications.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed