Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Repetitions which are not repetitions: the non-redundant nature of tautological compounds1

  • RÉKA BENCZES (a1)
Abstract

In English morphological literature, the term ‘tautological compound’ has been typically used to refer to two distinct – but closely related – phenomena: (1) compounds composed of a hyponym and a superordinate term (such as oak tree); and/or (2) compounds based upon two synonymous units (such as subject matter). Such combinations are one of the quirkiest – and least researched – phenomena of English compounding. Their oddity can be attributed to two main factors. First, as their name, ‘tautological compound’ implies, at face value such combinations can be considered as prime examples of the redundancy of language. Second, they do not follow normal compound-forming rules in the sense that both constituents can function as the semantic head (as opposed to ‘normal’ English compounds, which follow the Right-Hand Head Rule).

Perhaps it is the quirkiness of tautological compounds that accounts for the fact that not much has been said about them in traditional accounts of compounding, which typically relegate them to a marginal area of the English language. However, there is more to tautological compounds than meets the eye. What the present study wishes to demonstrate is that the term ‘tautological compound’ is a misnomer, as such combinations are far from being tautological or redundant in their meaning. Accordingly, the article first clarifies the notion of tautological compound, and then aims to give an account of the various roles that such combinations play in language, thereby demonstrating their non-tautological and non-redundant nature – in order to assign this much-neglected category to its proper, well-deserved place within English word formation.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
1

I am indebted to Kate Burridge for her invaluable comments. I also wish to thank my two anonymous reviewers for their excellent suggestions.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Allan, Keith. 1987. Hierarchies and the choice of left conjuncts (with particular attention to English). Journal of Linguistics 23 (1), 5177.
Allan, Keith & Burridge, Kate. 1991. Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology, The. 1988. Bronx, NY: H. W. Wilson Co.
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, Laurie. 1978. The grammar of nominal compounding: With special reference to Danish, English and French. Odense: Odense University Press.
Bauer, Laurie. 2008. Dvanda. Word Structure 1, 120.
Bauer, Laurie. 2010. Co-compounds in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22 (3), 201–19.
Bauer, Laurie & Renouf, Antoinette. 2001. A corpus-based study of compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics 29 (2), 101–23.
Benczes, Réka. 2012. Just a load of hibber-gibber? Making sense of English rhyming compounds. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32 (3), 299326.
Bloomfield, Maurice. 1920. Notes on the Divyāvadāna. Journal of the American Oriental Society 40, 336–52.
Brekle, Herbert E. 1978. Reflections on the conditions for the coining, use and understanding of nominal compounds. In Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Meid, Wolfgang (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Linguists, 6877. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
Carr, Charles T. 1939. Nominal compounds in Germanic. Oxford: St Andrews University Publications.
Clark, Eve V. 2009. First language acquisition, 2nd edn.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, Lane. 1904. Pleonastic compounds in Coleridge. Modern Language Notes 19 (7), 223–4.
Darian, Steven. 1979. The role of redundancy in language and language teaching. System 7 (1), 4759.
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2005. Word-formation in Natural Morphology. In Štekauer, Pavol & Lieber, Rochelle (eds.), Handbook of word-formation, 267–84. Dordrecht: Springer.
Emerson, Oliver Farrar. 1919. Middle English Clannesse. PMLA 34 (3), 494522.
Fabb, Nigel. 1998. Compounding. In Spencer, Andrew & Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 6684. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fay, Edwin W. 1913. Composition or suffixation? Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 45 (2), 111–31.
Gelman, Susan A., Wilcox, Sharon A. & Clark, Eve V.. 1989. Conceptual and lexical hierarchies in young children. Cognitive Development 4, 309–26.
Gessler, Nicholas. 1998. Skeuomorphs and cultural algorithms. In Porto, V. W., Saravanan, N., Waagen, D. & Eiben, A. E. (eds.), Evolutionary Programming VII: 7th International Conference, EP98 San Diego, California, USA, March 25–27, 1998 Proceedings, 229–38. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
Gustaffson, Marita. 1975. Binomial expressions in present-day English. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.
Harbus, Antonina. 2003. The situation of wisdom in Solomon and Saturn II. Studia Neophilologica 75 (2), 97103.
Hatcher, Anna Granville. 1952. Modern appositional compounds of inanimate reference. American Speech 27 (1), 315.
Iglesias-Rábade, Luis. 2011. Collocations in law texts in Late Middle English: Some evidence concerning adverbs ending in -. Studia Neophilologica 83 (1), 5466.
Jespersen, Otto. 1954. A modern English grammar on historical principles, part VI: Morphology. London: Bradford and Dickens.
Katamba, Francis. 2005. English words: Structure, history, usage, 2nd edn.London and New York: Routledge.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lehrer, Adrienne. 2003. Understanding trendy neologisms. Rivista di Linguistica 15 (2), 371–84.
Malkiel, Yakov. 1959. Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8, 113–60.
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd, revised edn.Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Norrick, Neal R. 1988. Binomial meaning in texts. Journal of English Linguistics 21 (1), 7287.
Oxford English Dictionary, The. 1989. 2nd edn; online version. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Renner, Vincent. 2008. On the semantics of English coordinate compounds. English Studies 89 (5), 606–13.
Reppert, J. D. 1954. Tautological compounds. Word Study 30 (1), 8.
Rosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B., Gray, Wayne D., Johnson, David M. & Boyes-Braem, Penny. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8, 382439.
Saeed, John I. 2009. Semantics, 3rd edn.Malden, MA, and Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal language. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Twardzisz, Piotr. 2011. Metaphors in commercial contracts. In Alm-Arvius, Christina, Johannesson, Nils-Lennart & Minugh, David C. (eds.), Selected papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival, 237–53. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
Ullmann, Stephen. 1977. Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willetts, R. F. 1960. Χρυσώνητος. Glotta 39 (1–2), 71–3.
Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–74.
Woods, Frank L. 1957. Nominal compounds of the Old High German ‘Benedictine Rule’. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 56 (1), 4251.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×