Skip to main content
×
Home

Revisiting the system of English relative clauses: structure, semantics, discourse functionality 1

  • FRANCIS CORNISH (a1)
Abstract

The goal of this article is to uncover the system underlying three types of English relative clauses, and to characterise their distinctive uses in discourse: NP-integrated ones, namely restrictive and ‘a-restrictive’ relative clauses, and non-integrated ones, represented by non-restrictive relatives.

The area at issue is central, since understanding the functioning of these constructions requires reference to the fundamental interface between grammar (language system) and discourse (language use). The discourse functions of the three subtypes of relatives are claimed to be underlain by their intrinsic morphosyntactic and semantic properties. A major aim is to highlight the relative degree of ‘communicative dynamism’ of each subtype of relative clause, in terms of its respective contribution to the construction of discourse.

In doing so, the article focuses on the distinctive properties of presupposed as well as non-presupposed restrictive relatives, and of definite as well as indefinite NPs containing integrated relatives more generally. Along the way, it critically examines certain controversial conceptions of the structural and functional features of the constructions at issue, and, in particular, the claim that there is no essential distinction to be drawn between ‘integrated’ and phrase-external relative clause subtypes at all.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
1

I would like to thank Jim Miller, Georges Kleiber, Daniel García Velasco, Fabio Del Prete and Ming-Ming Pu for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article, as well as the two anonymous ELL reviewers for their remarks on the initial submission, and in particular Bernd Kortmann.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aarts Bas. 2013. English syntax and argumentation, 4th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Arkoh Ruby & Matthewson Lisa. 2013. A familiar definite article in Akan. Lingua 123, 130.
Bache Carl & Jakobsen Leif Kvistgaard. 1980. On the distinction between restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses in modern English. Lingua 52, 243–67.
Benveniste Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
Bhat D. N. S. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biber Douglas, Johansson Stig, Leech Geoffrey, Conrad Susan & Finegan Edward. 1999. Grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Chierchia Gennaro & McConnell-Ginet Sally. 1990. Meaning and grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cornish Francis. 2009. Inter-sentential anaphora and coherence relations in discourse: A perfect match. Language Sciences 31 (5), 572–92.
Cornish Francis & Orvig Anne Salazar. 2016. A critical look at the notion ‘pro-form’: Evidence from indexical markers, spoken discourse and (French) child language. Language Sciences 54, 5876.
Dehé Nicole. 2014. Parentheticals in spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Francesca Del Gobbo. 2003. Appositives and quantification. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 9.1, 7388.
Denison David & Hundt Marianne. 2013. Defining relatives. Journal of English Linguistics 41 (2), 135–67.
Depraetere Ilse. 1996. Foregrounding in English relative clauses. Linguistics 34, 699731.
Dik Simon C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar, part II: Complex and derived constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Emonds Joseph. 1979. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10 (2), 211–43.
Erteschik-Shir Nomi. 2007. Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fabb Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26, 5778.
Fox Barbara & Thompson Sandra A.. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66 (2), 297316.
‘The Great American Sandwich’: a recorded conversation that formed part of the SSRC-funded project HR5152, The Syntax of Scottish English (1977–1980).
Hannay Mike & Keizer Evelien. 2005. A discourse treatment of English non-restrictive nominal appositions in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Mackenzie J. Lachlan & de los Ángeles Gómez-González María (eds.), Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar, 159–94. Bern: Peter Lang.
Huddleston Rodney & Pullum Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobson Pauline. 1989. Issues and results in syntactic theory. MS, Program in Linguistics and Cognitive Science, Brown University.
Jaggar Philip. J. 1998. Restrictive vs. non-restrictive relative clauses in Hausa: Where morphosyntax and semantics meet. Studies in African Linguistics 27 (2), 199238.
Jespersen Otto. 1927. A modern English grammar on historical principles, part III: Syntax, vol. 2. London: Allen & Unwin; Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Keizer Evelien. 2012. English proforms in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 34 (4), 400–20.
Larreya Pierre & Rivière Claude. 2010. Grammaire explicative de l'anglais, 4th edn. Paris: Pearson Education France.
Loock Rudy. 2007. Appositive relative clauses and their functions in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 39, 336–62.
Loock Rudy. 2010. Appositive relative clauses in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lyons John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malan Naomi. 1999. La proposition relative en anglais contemporain: Une approche pragmatique. Gap and Paris: Ophrys.
McCawley James. D. 1981. The syntax and semantics of English relative clauses. Lingua 53, 99149.
McCloskey James. 1979. Model-theoretic semantics and transformational grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Miller Jim. 2008. An introduction to English syntax, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Miller Jim & Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest M. M.. 2006. Spoken and written language. In Bernini Giuliano & Schwarz Marcia L. (eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, 964. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Osam E. Kweku. 2003. An introduction to the verbal and multi-verbal system of Akan. In Beermann D. & Hellan L. (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on multi-verb constructions. Trondheim Summer School, 2003. http://edvarda.hf.ntnu.no/ling/tross/
Pu Ming-Ming. 2007. The distribution of relative clauses in Chinese discourse. Discourse Processes 43 (1), 2553.
Quirk Randolph. 1957. Relative clauses in educated spoken English. English Studies 38, 97109.
Quirk Randolph, Greenbaum Sidney, Leech Geoffrey & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rydén Mats. 1974. On notional relations in the relative clause complex. English Studies 55, 542–5.
Sag Ivan. A. 1997. English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics 33 (2), 431–83.
Schachter Paul. 1973. Focus and relativization. Language 49 (1), 1946.
Sigley Robert. 1997. Choosing your relatives: Relative clauses in New Zealand English. PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington (cited in Denison & Hundt 2013).
Van der Auwera Johan. 1985. Relative that – a centennial dispute. Journal of Linguistics 21, 149–79.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 67 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 482 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd March 2017 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.