Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Same difference: the phonetic shape of High Rising Terminals in London

  • Erez Levon (a1)

This article investigates patterns of variation in the phonetic shape of High Rising Terminal (HRT) intonation contours on declarative utterances in London English. Previous research has demonstrated that there are two pragmatically distinct meanings for HRTs in London, distributed across different groups of users and conversational contexts. Based on current theories of intonational meaning, we would expect this pragmatic differentiation to correlate with differences in tune shape, given the assumption that there is a one-to-one correspondence between a contour’s meaning and its phonological form. Following the example of prior studies of HRTs in other locations, analyses focus on three phonetic properties: rise excursion size, rise dynamism, and the alignment of the rise onset with the nuclear syllable. Unlike much previous research elsewhere, mixed-model regression analyses demonstrate that pragmatic differences in how HRTs are used in London do not correlate with differences in the phonetic characteristics under investigation. The discussion focuses on how to reconcile this result with theories of intonational meaning, arguing that the findings for London may be due to the relatively recent arrival of HRTs in the variety, and, as a result, the lack of a differentiated field of form–meaning correspondences for the contour in the region.

Hide All
Arvaniti, Amalia & Atkins, Madeleine. 2016. Uptalk in Southern British English. In Jon Barnes, Alejna Brugos, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Nanette Veilleux (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 8, 153–7. Boston: Boston University.
Arvaniti, Amalia & Ladd, D. Robert. 2009. Greek wh-questions and the phonology of intonation. Phonology 26, 4374.
Barry, Angela. 2008. The form, function and distribution of high rising intonation in Southern California and Southern British English. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr Muller.
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 148.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2015. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Available at:
Bradford, Barbara. 1997. Upspeak in British English. English Today 13, 2936.
Brazil, David, Coulthard, Malcolm & Johns, Catherine. 1980. Discourse intonation and language teaching. Harlow: Longman.
Britain, David. 1992. Linguistic change in intonation: The use of High Rising Terminals in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 4, 77104.
Britain, David & Newman, John. 1992. High Rising Terminals in New Zealand English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 22, 111.
Ching, Marvin. 1982. The question intonation in assertions. American Speech 57, 95107.
Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruttenden, Alan. 1994. Rises in English. In Jack Lewis (ed.), Studies in general and English phonetics: Essays in honour of Professor J. D. O’Connor, 155173. London: Routledge.
Daly, Nicola & Warren, Paul. 2001. Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: Speaker sex and intonation patterns. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5, 8596.
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 453476.
Eckert, Penelope. 2016. Variation, meaning and social change. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 6585. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fletcher, Janet, Grabe, Esther & Warren, Paul. 2005. Intonational variation in four varieties of English: The high rising tune. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 390409. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fletcher, Janet & Harrington, Jonathan. 2001. High rising terminals and fall-rises in Australian English. Phonetica 51, 215219.
Fletcher, Janet & Loakes, Deborah. 2006. Patterns of rising and falling in Australian English. In Paul Warren & Catherine Watson (eds.), Proceedings of 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 42–7. Canberra: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
Fletcher, Janet, Stirling, Lesley, Lushin, Ilana & Wales, Roger. 2002. Intonational rises and dialog acts in the Australian English map task. Language and Speech 45, 229253.
Gioacchino, Martina Di & Crook Jessop, Lorena. 2011. Uptalk: Towards a quantitative analysis. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 33, 116.
Grabe, Esther. 2004. Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. In Peter Gilles & Jörg Peters (eds.), Regional variation in intonation, 931. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guy, Gregory, Horvath, Barbara, Vonwiller, Julia, Daisley, Elaine & Rogers, Inge. 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15, 2352.
Guy, Gregory & Vonwiller, Julia. 1984. The meaning of an intonation in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 4, 117.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
Henton, Caroline. 1995. Pitch dynamism in female and male speech. Language and Communication 15, 4361.
Hirschberg, Julia. 2002. The pragmatics of intonational meaning. In Bernard Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody Conference, 6568. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of linguistic change: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Labov, William & Waletzky, Joshua. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 1244. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1983. Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language 59, 721759.
Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ladd, D. Robert & Morton, Rachel. 1997. The perception of intonational emphasis: Continuous or categorical? Journal of Phonetics 25, 313342.
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and woman’s place. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levon, Erez. 2016. Gender, interaction and intonational variation: The discourse functions of High Rising Terminals in London. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20, 133163.
Liberman, Mark. 2008. Uptalk vs UNBI again [blog post]. Language Log. 23 November. Retrieved from http://languagelog/ldc/
McGregor, Jeannette & Palethorpe, Sallyanne. 2008. High Rising Tunes in Australian English: The communicative function of L* and H* pitch accent onsets. Australian Journal of Linguistics 28, 171193.
McLemore, Cynthia. 1991. The pragmatic interpretation of English intonation: Sorority speech. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Moore, Brian & Glasberg, Brian. 1983. Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74, 750–3.
Nolan, Francis. 2003. Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 771–4. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Podesva, Robert. 2011. Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39, 233264.
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223254. New York: Academic Press.
Prince, Ellen. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information status. In William Mann & Sandra Thomspon (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fundraising text, 295325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at:
Ritchart, Amanda & Arvaniti, Amalia. 2014. The form and use of uptalk in Southern California English. In Nick Campbell, Dafydd Gibbon & Daniel Hirst (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, 1620. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
Shobbrook, Katherine & House, Jill. 2003. High rising tones in Southern British English. In Maria-Josep Sole, Daniel Recasens & Joaquin Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, 1273–6. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Shokeir, Vanessa. 2008. Evidence for the stable use of uptalk in South Ontario English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 1624.
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23, 193229.
Steedman, Mark. 1991. Structure and intonation. Language 67, 260296.
Steedman, Mark. 2014. The surface compositional semantics of English intonation. Language 90, 257.
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41, 3157.
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2013. Comparative sociolingistics. In J. K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 2nd edn, 128156. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tyler, Joseph. 2015a. A social explanation for a gender difference in the size of terminal rising pitch (uptalk). Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 44, University of Toronto.
Tyler, Joseph. 2015b. Expanding and mapping the indexical field: Rising pitch, the uptalk stereotype, and perceptual variation. Journal of English Linguistics 43, 284310.
Ward, Gregory & Hirschberg, Julia. 1985. Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall–rise intonation. Language 61, 747776.
Warren, Paul. 2005. Patterns of late rising in New Zealand: Intonational variation or intonational change? Language Variation and Change 17, 209230.
Warren, Paul. 2016. Uptalk: The phenomenon of rising intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warren, Paul & Britain, David. 2000. Intonation and prosody in New Zealand English. In Allan Bell & Koenraad Kuiper (eds.), New Zealand English, 146172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Warren, Paul & Daly, Nicola. 2005. Characterizing New Zealand English intonation: Broad and narrow analysis. In Allan Bell, R. Harlow & D. Sparks (eds.), Languages of New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95188. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed