Skip to main content

Social networks and language change in Tudor and Stuart London – only connect?


Place is an integral part of social network analysis, which reconstructs network structures and documents the network members’ linguistic practices in a community. Historical network analysis presents particular challenges in both respects. This article first discusses the kinds of data, official documents, personal letters and diaries that historians have used in reconstructing social networks and communities. These analyses could be enriched by including linguistic data and, vice versa, historical sociolinguistic findings may often be interpreted in terms of social networks.

Focusing on Early Modern London, I present two case studies, the first one investigating a sixteenth-century merchant family exchange network and the second discussing the seventeenth-century naval administrator Samuel Pepys, whose role as a community broker between the City and Westminster is assessed in linguistic terms. My results show how identifying the leaders and laggers of linguistic change can add to our understanding of the varied ways in which linguistic innovations spread to and from Tudor and Stuart London both within and across social networks.

Hide All
Archer Ian W. 2000. Social networks in Restoration London: The evidence of Samuel Pepys's diary. In Shepard & Withington (eds.), 76–94.
Bailey Richard W. & Moore Colette. 2007. Henry Machyn's English: Getting it right. In Cain Christopher M. & Russom Geoffrey (eds.), Studies in the history of the English Language III, 231–50. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bax Randy. 2000. A network strength scale for the study of eighteenth century English. European Journal of English Studies 4 (3), 277–89.
Bergs Alexander. 2005. Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boulton Jeremy. 1987. Neighbourhood and society: A London suburb in the seventeenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke Peter. 2004. Languages and communities in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CEEC = Corpus of Early English Correspondence. 1998. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi, and Minna Palander-Collin. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
Chambers J. K., Peter Trudgill & Schilling-Estes Natalie (eds.). 2004. The handbook of language variation and change. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.
Conde-Silvestre Juan Camilo. 2012. The role of social networks and mobility in diachronic sociolinguistics. In Hernández-Campoy Juan Manuel & Conde-Silvestre Juan Camilo (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 332–52. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Conde-Silvestre Juan Camilo & Hernández-Campoy Juan Manuel. 2004. A sociolinguistic approach to the diffusion of Chancery written practices in late fifteenth century private correspondence. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 105 (2), 133–52.
D'Cruse Shani. 1994. The middling sort in eighteenth-century Colchester: Independence, social relations and the community broker. In Barry Jonathan & Brooks Christopher (eds.), The middling sort of people: Culture, society and politics in England, 1550–1800, 181207. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
De la Bédoyère Guy (ed.). 2006. The letters of Samuel Pepys, 1656–1703. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
Eckert Penelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Efron Bradley & Tibshirani Robert. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. ‘Samuel Pepys’. (29 July 2014).
Fitzmaurice Susan. 2000. Coalitions and the investigation of social influence in linguistic history. European Journal of English Studies 4 (3), 265–76.
Fitzmaurice Susan. 2010. Coalitions, networks, and discourse communities in Augustan England: The Spectator and the early eighteenth-century essay. In Hickey Raymond (ed.), Eighteenth-century English, 106–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gil Alexander. 1621. Logonomia Anglica. London: Iohannes Beale.
Granovetter Mark. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1, 201–33.
Gries Stefan Th. & Hilpert Martin. 2010. Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: A multifactorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach. English Language and Linguistics 14, 293320.
Hazen Kirk. 2004. The family. In Chambers et al. (eds.), 500–25.
Heath Helen Truesdell (ed.). 1955. The letters of Samuel Pepys and his family circle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Janda Richard D. & Joseph Brian D.. 2003. On language, change, and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In Joseph Brian D. & Janda Richard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 3180. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.
Jucker Andreas H. & Kopaczyk Joanna. 2013. Communities of practice as a locus of language change. In Kopaczyk & Jucker (eds.), 1–16.
Knighton Charles S. 2004. Pepys, Samuel (1633–1703). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, online edn, Jan 2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (11 August 2014).
Kopaczyk Joanna & Jucker Andreas H. (eds.). 2013. Communities of practice in the history of English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kytö Merja. 1993. Third-person present singular verb inflection in early British and American English. Language Variation and Change 5, 113–39.
Labov William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1, Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2, Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Latham Robert (ed.). 1983. The diary of Samuel Pepys, vol. X, Companion. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Milroy James & Milroy Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21, 339–84.
Milroy Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Milroy Lesley. 2000. Social network analysis and language change: Introduction. European Journal of English Studies 4 (3), 217–23.
Milroy Lesley. 2004. Social networks. In Chambers et al. (eds.), 549–72.
Nevalainen Terttu. 1999. Making the best use of ‘bad’ data: Evidence for sociolinguistic variation in Early Modern English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100 (4), 499533.
Nevalainen Terttu. 2000. Mobility, social networks and language change in early modern England. European Journal of English Studies 4 (3), 253–64.
Nevalainen Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg Helena. 2000. The changing role of London on the linguistic map of Tudor and Stuart England. In Kastovsky Dieter & Mettinger Arthur (eds.), The history of English in a social context, 279337. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nevalainen Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg Helena. 2003. Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.
Nevalainen Terttu, Raumolin-Brunberg Helena & Mannila Heikki. 2011. The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time-depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23 (1), 143.
Nurmi Arja. 2013. ‘All the rest ye must lade yourself’: Deontic modality in sixteenth-century English merchant letters. In van der Wal Marijke J. & Rutten Gijsbert (eds.), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 165–82. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nurmi Arja, Nevala Minna & Palander-Collin Minna (eds.). 2009. The language of daily life in England (1400–1800). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
PCEEC = Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence. 2006. Annotated by Ann Taylor, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. University of York and University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.
Rappaport Steve. [1989]2002. Worlds within worlds: Structures of life in sixteenth-century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raumolin-Brunberg Helena. 1998. Social factors and pronominal change in the seventeenth century: The Civil-War effect? In Fisiak Jacek & Krygier Marcin (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics (1996), 361–88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Raumolin-Brunberg Helena & Nevalainen Terttu. 2007. Historical sociolinguistics: The Corpus of Early English Correspondence. In Beal Joan C., Corrigan Karen P. & Moisl Hermann L. (eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora, vol. 2, Diachronic databases, 148–71. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sairio Anni. 2009. Language and letters of the Bluestocking network: Sociolinguistic issues in eighteenth-century epistolary English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 75). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Shepard Alexandra & Withington Phil (eds.). 2000. Communities in Early Modern England: Networks, place, rhetoric. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade Ingrid. 2008. Letters as a source for reconstructing social networks: The case of Robert Lowth. In Dossena Marina & van Ostade Ingrid Tieken-Boon (eds.), Studies in Late Modern English correspondence: Methodology and data, 5176. Bern: Peter Lang.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade Ingrid. 2009. An introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wenger Etienne. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winchester Barbara (ed.). 1953. The Johnson letters, 1542–1552. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of London.
Winchester Barbara. 1955. Tudor family portrait. London: Jonathan Cape.
Withington Phil & Shepard Alexandra. 2000. Introduction: Communities in early modern England. In Shepard & Withington (eds.), 1−15.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 84 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 263 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.