Skip to main content Accessibility help

Sociophonetic variation of like in British dialects: effects of function, context and predictability 1



This study examines sociophonetic variation in different functions of like among adolescents in London and Edinburgh. It attempts to determine the factors that may explain this variation. Our results suggest that the function of like correlates primarily with contextual factors, rather than the phonetic factors of vowel quality, /l/ to vowel duration and /k/ realisation. In particular, the preceding and following segments and their bigram predictability emerge as highly significant, in addition to the boundary strength following like. In both London and Edinburgh, the vowel appears to be the only non-contextual feature that is sensitive to the function of like: quotative be like is more likely to be monophthongised than other functions of like. We argue that the more monophthongal nature of quotative like is due to the syntactic and prosodic context in which it occurs.



Hide All

This research was funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC, grant AH/K003674/1, Erik Schleef PI). We are grateful to Fernanda McDougall and Patrycja Strycharczuk for assisting ably with coding and corpus handling. We thank Josef Fruehwald for providing us with the Praat script for speech rate, and Constantine Lignos for his assistance in extracting bigram frequencies from the SUBTLEX corpus. We also thank Maciej Baranowski, Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, Tine Breban, Jenny Cheshire, Yuni Kim, Laurel MacKenzie and the members of the University of Manchester Phonology reading group for their expert advice on the topic. Particular thanks go to two anonymous reviewers for providing us with extremely helpful, considerate and insightful comments, which have shaped this paper. We alone are responsible for any failings or shortcomings that remain.



Hide All
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English discourse particles. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Aitken, Adam Jack. 1984. Scottish accents and dialects. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 94114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Andersen, Gisle. 2001. Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ash, Sharon. 1982. The vocalization of /l/ in Philadelphia. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Beaken, Michael. 1971. A study of phonological development in a primary school population of East London. Unpublished PhD thesis, University College London.
Beckman, Mary E. & Hirschberg, Julia. 1993. The ToBI annotation conventions. Unpublished manuscript. Available online: Accessed 12 August 2014.
Bell, Alan, Jurafsky, Daniel, Fosler-Lussier, Eric, Girand, Cynthia, Gregory, Michelle & Gildea, Daniel. 2003. Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113, 1001–24.
Berg, Thomas. 2000. The position of adjectives on the noun–verb continuum. English Language and Linguistics 4, 269–93.
Blyth, Carl, Recktenwald, Sigrid & Wang, Jenny. 1990. I'm like, ‘say what?!’ A new quotative in American oral narrative. American Speech 65, 215–27.
Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5, 341–5.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brugman, Hennie & Russel, Albert. 2004. Annotating multi-media/multi-modal resources with ELAN. In Lino, M., Xavier, M., Ferreira, F., Costa, R. & Silva, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Language Evaluation (LREC 2004), 2065–8. Paris: European Language Resources Association.
Brysbaert, Marc & New, Boris. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41, 977–90.
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2001. An alternative view of like: Its grammaticalization in conversational American English and beyond. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 11, 2141.
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2004. The sociolinguistic constraints on the quotative system: US English and British English compared. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006. Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: Attitudes towards the ‘new’ quotatives in the UK. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10, 362–81.
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2014. Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Buchstaller, Isabelle & D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Localized globalisation: A multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like . Journal of Sociolinguistics 13, 291331.
Bush, Nathan. 1999. The predictive value of transitional probability for word-boundary palatalization in English. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.
Butters, Ronald. 1982. Editor's note to Schourup (1982). American Speech 57, 149.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14, 261–90.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Joseph, Brian D. & Janda, Richard D. (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bybee, Joan & Scheibman, Joanne. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37, 575–96.
Carter, Paul & Local, John. 2007. F2 variation in Newcastle and Leeds English liquid systems. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37, 183–99.
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue & Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15, 151–96.
Chirrey, Deborah. 1999. Edinburgh: Descriptive material. In Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, 223–9. London: Arnold.
Cruttenden, Alan. 2001. Gimson's Pronunciation of English, 6th edition. Abingdon and New York: Arnold.
D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2005. Like: Syntax and development. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Toronto.
D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2006. Lexical replacement and the like(s). American Speech 81, 339–57.
D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2007. Like and language ideology: Disentangling fact from fiction. American Speech 82, 386419.
D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2014. Discourse. In Bowern, Claire & Evans, Bethwyn (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 410–22. New York: Routledge.
D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2015. Quotation and advances in understanding syntactic systems. Annual Review of Linguistics 1, 4361.
Dailey-O'Cain, Jennifer. 2000. The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward focuser like and quotative like . Journal of Sociolinguistics 4, 6080.
Dion, Nathalie & Poplack, Shana. 2007. Linguistic mythbusting: The role of the media in diffusing change. Presented at New Ways of Analysing Variation 36, University of Pennsylvania.
Dinkin, Aaron J. 2008. The real effect of word frequency on phonetic variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14.1.
Drager, Katie K. 2009. A sociophonetic ethnography of Selwyn Girls’ High. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Canterbury.
Drager, Katie K. 2011. Sociophonetic variation and the lemma. Journal of Phonetics 39, 694707.
Durham, Mercedes, Haddican, Bill, Zweig, Eytan, Johnson, Daniel Ezra, Baker, Zipporah, Cockeram, David, Danks, Esther & Tyler, Louise. 2012. Constant linguistic effects in the diffusion of be like . Journal of English Linguistics 40, 316–37.
ELAN. Language archiving technology, version 3.8.0. 2009. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Accessed 6 November 2009.
Ferrara, Kathleen & Bell, Barbara. 1995. Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of be + like . American Speech 70, 265–90.
Fowler, Carol A. & Housum, Jonathan. 1987. Talkers’ signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 489504.
Fox, Sue. 2007. The demise of Cockneys? Language change in London's ‘traditional’ East End. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex.
Haas, Florian. 2007. The development of English each other: Grammaticalization, lexicalization, or both? English Language and Linguistics 11, 3150.
Haddican, William, Zweig, Eytan & Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2015. Change in the syntax and semantics of be like quotatives. In Biberauer, Theresa & Walkden, George (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological and information-structural interactions. Proceedings of the 12th meeting of Diachronic Generative Syntax (DiDS XII), 5471. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.. 2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
Hay, Jennifer & Baayen, Harold. 2002. Parsing and productivity. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 203–35. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Joseph, Brian D. & Janda, Richard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 575601. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heuven, Walter J. B. van, Mandera, Pawel, Keuleers, Emmanuel & Brysbaert, Marc. 2014. Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67, 1176–90.
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt & Zeileis, Achim. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15, 651–74.
Hughes, Arthur, Trudgill, Peter & Watt, Dominic. 2012. English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Routledge.
Johnston, Paul. 1985. The rise and fall of the Morningside/Kelvinside accent. In Manfred Görlach (ed.), Focus on: Scotland, 3756. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Johnston, Paul. 2007. Scottish English and Scots. In Britain, David (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 105–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan & Girand, Cynthia. 2002. The role of lemma in form variation. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VII, 134. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan, Gregory, Michelle & Raymond, William D.. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 229–54. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kelly, Michael H. & Kathryn Bock, J.. 1988. Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14, 389403.
Kerswill, Paul, Torgersen, Eivind & Fox, Sue. 2008. Reversing ‘drift’: Innovation and diffusion in the London diphthong system. Language Variation and Change 20, 451–91.
Klewitz, Gabriele & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1999. Quote – unquote? The role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics 9: 459485.
Krug, Manfred. 1998. String frequency: A cognitive motivating factor in coalescence, language processing, and linguistic change. Journal of English Linguistics 26, 286320.
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 118. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Meyerhoff, Miriam & Schleef, Erik. 2013. Hitting an Edinburgh target: Immigrant adolescents’ acquisition of variation in Edinburgh English. In Lawson, Robert (ed.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on Scotland, 103–28. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Phillips, Betty S. 2006. Word frequency and lexical diffusion. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rhodes, Richard A. 1996. English reduced vowels and the nature of natural processes. In Hurch, Bernhard & Rhodes, Richard (eds.), Natural phonology: The state of the art, 239–59. Mouton de Gruyter.
Romaine, Suzanne & Lange, Deborah. 1991. The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalisation in process. American Speech 66, 227–79.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schleef, Erik. 2013. Glottal replacement of /t/ in two British capitals: Effects of word frequency and morphological compositionality. Language Variation and Change 25, 201–23.
Schleef, Erik, Meyerhoff, Miriam & Clark, Lynn. 2011. Teenagers’ acquisition of variation: A comparison of locally-born and migrant teens’ realisation of English (ing) in Edinburgh and London. English World-Wide 32, 206–36.
Schourup, Lawrence Clifford. 1983. Common discourse particles in English conversation. Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 28.
Scobbie, James M., Hewlett, Nigel & Turk, Alice E.. 1999. Standard English in Edinburgh and Glasgow: The Scottish vowel length rule revealed. In Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, 230–45. London: Arnold.
Scobbie, James M. & Pouplier, Marianne. 2010. The role of syllable structure in external sandhi: An EPG study of vocalisation and retraction in word-final English /l/. Journal of Phonetics 38, 240–59.
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Speitel, Hans H. 1983. A sociolinguistic investigation of Edinburgh speech. Unpublished end of grant report for the Social Science Research Council.
Sproat, Richard & Fujimora, Osamu. 1993. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21, 291311.
Strobl, Carolin, Malley, James & Tutz, Gerhard. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14, 323–48.
Stuart-Smith, Jane. 1999. Glasgow: Accent and voice quality. In Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, 203–22. London: Arnold.
Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2008. Scottish English: phonology. In Kortmann, Bernd & Upton, Clive (eds.), Varieties of English: The British Isles, 4870. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2004. He's like, she's like: The quotative system in Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8, 493514.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D'Arcy, Alexandra. 2007. Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19, 199217.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Hudson, Rachel. 1999. Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3, 147–72.
Tamminga, Meredith. 2014. Sound change without frequency effects: Ramifications for phonological theory. In Santana-LaBarge, Robert E. (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, vol. 31, 457–65. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Tollfree, Laura. 1999. South East London English: Discrete versus continuous modelling of consonantal reduction. In Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, 163–84. London: Arnold.
Turton, Danielle. 2014. An ultrasound investigation of /l/-darkening in English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20.
Underhill, Robert. 1988. Like is like, focus. American Speech 63, 234–46.
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2012. Quotative go and be like: Grammar and grammaticalization. In Buchstaller, Isabelle & van Alphen, Ingrid (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 173202. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wichmann, Anne. 2011. Grammaticalization and prosody. In Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 331–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yuan, Jiahong & Liberman, Mark. 2009. Investigating /l/ variation in English through forced alignment. Interspeech 10, 2215–18.
Yuan, Jiahong & Liberman, Mark. 2011. /l/ variation in American English: A corpus approach. Journal of Speech Sciences 1, 3546.
Zipf, George Kingsley. 1929. Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 15, 195.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Sociophonetic variation of like in British dialects: effects of function, context and predictability 1



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.