Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Special issue on support strategies in language variation and change

  • BRITTA MONDORF (a1) and JAVIER PÉREZ-GUERRA (a2)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Special issue on support strategies in language variation and change
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Special issue on support strategies in language variation and change
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Special issue on support strategies in language variation and change
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. To view the full text please use the links above to select your preferred format.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and form. London: Longman.
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Corver, Norbert. 1997. Much-support as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28 (1), 119–64.
Croft, William 1990 Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, Holger. 2008. Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics 19, 457–82.
Dufter, Andreas, Fleischer, Jürg & Seiler, Guido (eds.). 2009. Describing and modeling variation in grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The auxiliary do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Erben, Johannes. 1969. Tun als Hilfsverb im heutigen Deutsch. In Engel, Ulrich, Grebe, Paul & Rupp, Heinz (eds.), Festschrift für Hugo Moser, 4652. Düsseldorf: Schwann.
Fanego, Teresa, López-Couso, María José & Pérez-Guerra, Javier (eds.). 2002. English historical syntax and morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy (1984, 1990) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vols. I and II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Grammatical variation in English: A question of ‘structure vs function’? In Rohdenburg, Günter & Mondorf, Britta (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 155–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hilpert, Martin. 2008. The English comparative – language structure and language use. English Language and Linguistics 12 (3), 395417.
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaeger, Florian. 2010. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61, 2362.
Jäger, Siegfried. 1971. Der Konjunktiv in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart. Untersuchungen an ausgewählten Texten. Munich: Hueber.
Klemola, Juhani. 1999. Still sat in your car? Pseudo-passives with sat and stood and the history of non-standard varieties of English English. Sociolinguistica 13, 129–40.
Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar, Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend & Upton, Clive (eds.). 2004. A handbook of varieties of English. 2 vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Labov, William. 1978. Where does the linguistic variable stop? A reply to Beatriz Lavandera. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 44, 122.
Langer, Stefan. 2004. A linguistic test battery for support verb constructions. Lingvisticae Investigationes 27, 171–84.
Lastra, Yolanda & Butragueño, Pedro Martin. 2010. Futuro perifrástico y futuro morfológico en el Corpus Sociolingüístico de la ciudad de México. Oralia 13, 145–71.
Lavandera, Beatriz R. 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7, 171–83.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Maguire, Warren & McMahon, April (eds.). 2011. Analysing variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahlberg, Michaela. 2003. The textlinguistic dimension of corpus linguistics: The support function of English general nouns and its theoretical implications. International Journal of English Corpus Linguistics 8 (1), 97108.
Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More support for more-support: The role of processing constraints on the choice between synthetic and analytic comparative forms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mondorf, Britta. 2010. Genre-effects in the replacement of reflexives by particles. In Dorgeloh, Heidrun & Wanner, Anja (eds.), Approaches to syntactic variation and genre, 219−45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mondorf, Britta. 2014. (Apparently) competing motivations in morpho-syntactic variation. In MacWhinney, Brian, Malchukov, Andrej & Moravcsik, Edith (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 209−28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pérez-Guerra, Javier. 2016. Do you investigate word order in detail or do you investigate in detail word order? On word order and headedness in the recent history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12 (1), 103−28.
Peters, Pam, Collins, Peter & Smith, Adam (eds.). 2009. Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1986. Phonologisch und morphologisch bedingte Variation in der Verbalsyntax des Niederdeutschen. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 109, 86117.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7 (2), 149–82.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Rohdenburg & Mondorf (eds.), 205–49.
Rohdenburg, Günter & Mondorf, Britta (eds.). 2003. Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia (eds.). 2009. One language – two grammars? Grammatical differences between British and American. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Romaine, Suzanne. 1981. On the problem of syntactic variation: A reply to Beatriz Lavandera and William Labov. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 82, 138.
Rosenbach, Anette. 2003. Aspects of iconicity and economy in the choice between the s-genitive and the of-genitive in English. In Rohdenburg & Mondorf (eds.), 379–412.
Schlüter, Julia. 2005. Rhythmic grammar: The influence of rhythm on grammatical variation and change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schlüter, Julia. 2009. The conditional subjunctive. In Rohdenburg & Schlüter (eds.), 277–305.
Stein, Dieter. 1990. The semantics of syntactic change: Aspects of the evolution of do in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2003. Be going to versus will/shall: Does syntax matter? Journal of English Linguistics 31, 295323.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2005. Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1 (1), 113–50.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B.. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Special issue on support strategies in language variation and change

  • BRITTA MONDORF (a1) and JAVIER PÉREZ-GUERRA (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.