Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Fanego, Teresa 2016. The Great Complement Shift revisited: The constructionalization of ACC-inggerundives. Functions of Language, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 84.


    Duffley, Patrick J. and Dion-Girardeau, Samuel 2015. Perspectives on Complementation.


    Fanego, Teresa 2015. Perspectives on Complementation.


    Duffley, Patrick 2014. Reclaiming Control as a Semantic and Pragmatic Phenomenon. Vol. 251, Issue. ,

    van de Pol, Nikki and Cuyckens, Hubert 2014. Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns.


    ×
  • English Language and Linguistics, Volume 6, Issue 2
  • November 2002, pp. 309-323

Subject control and coreference in Early Modern English free adjuncts and absolutes

  • Carmen Río-Rey (a1) (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1360674302000254
  • Published online: 01 October 2002
Abstract

The clear-cut distinction between free adjuncts and absolutes based on the presence in absolutes of an overt subject different from the subject of the matrix clause, as opposed to the covert subject – controlled by the subject of the matrix clause – of free adjuncts, does not always hold. While it is generally agreed that unrelated free adjuncts are fairly frequent in Present-day English (PE), absolutes whose subject is identical to that of the matrix clause are regarded as obsolete (Jespersen, 1909–49; Kortmann, 1991; Söderlind, 1958; Visser, 1963–73). However, no statistical evidence has been provided on this topic for earlier stages of the history of English. This article quantitatively assesses whether the various degrees of relatedness observed in Early Modern English (EModE) coincide with those attested for PE, and concludes that the boundaries between free adjuncts and absolutes were considerably fuzzier in EModE, a phenomenon to which punctuation decisively contributed.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×