Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T17:54:57.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicative language teaching in Japan: current practices and future prospects

Investigating students' experiences of current communicative approaches to English language teaching in schools in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2013

Emiko Abe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Japan, the ability to speak and understand English is widely regarded as essential for communication in a ‘globalized’ world. At the same time, however, many Japanese are reluctant to communicate in English because they perceive themselves (and are often perceived by others) to be poor speakers of English, despite the fact that they will have studied English for at least six years in junior and senior high school. In response to this, the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) has recently revised the national syllabus for English teaching. The revised syllabus places more emphasis on developing oral communication skills, and proposes a much greater use of communicative language teaching (CLT) methodology in order to bring this about. This paper describes the present situation of CLT in Japan based on questionnaire data obtained from 48 Japanese university students, and proposes that a more effective and practical approach to CLT and English teaching more generally may be obtained by adopting a ‘World Englishes’ point of view.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 46 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, D. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 5th edition. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. 1999. Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. 2008. Pragmatics and Discourse. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. 2005. The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2009. World Englishes: a Resource Book for Students. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. 1985. ‘Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle.’ In Quirk, R. and Widdowson, H. G. (eds), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y. 2008. ‘Culture, contexts, and interpretability.’ World Englishes, 27(3), 309–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mckay, S. L. 2002. Teaching English as an International Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1978. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar