Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:31:57.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English in its socio-historical context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2013

J. M. Hernández-Campoy
J. M. Hernández-Campoy*
Affiliation:
University of Murcia
*
jmcampoy@um.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since Romaine's (1982) pioneering work, historical sociolinguistics has been studying the relationships between language and society in its socio-historical context by focusing on the study of language variation and change with the use of variationist methods. Work on this interdisciplinary sub-field subsisting on sociology, history and linguistics is expanding, as shown, for example, by Milroy (1992), Nevalainen & Raumolin-Brunberg (1996; 2003), Ammon, Mattheier & Nelde (1999), Jahr (1999), Kastovsky & Mettinger (2000), Bergs (2005), Conde-Silvestre (2007), Trudgill (2010), or Hernández-Campoy & Conde-Silvestre (2012). These works have been elucidating the theoretical limits of the discipline and applying the tenets and findings of contemporary sociolinguistic research to the interpretation of linguistic material from the past. Yet in the course of this development historical sociolinguistics has sometimes been criticised for lack of representativeness and its empirical validity has occasionally been questioned. Fortunately, in parallel to the development of electronic corpora, the assistance of corpus linguistics and social history has conferred ‘empirical’ ease and ‘historical’ confidence on the discipline.

Type
Review
Information
English Today , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 58 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammon, U., Mattheier, K. J. & Nelde, P. H. (eds.) 1999. Historische Soziolinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Baugh, A. C. & Cable, T. 1951/1993. A History of the English Language. Fourth edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bergs, A. T. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics. Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Conde-Silvestre, J. C. 2007. Sociolingüística histórica. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 1997/2005. History of English. Second edition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennell, B. A. 2001. A History of English: A Sociolinguistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Conde-Silvestre, J. C. (eds) 2012. The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R. & Denison, D. (eds) 2008. A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jahr, E. H. (ed.) 1999. Language Change. Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. & Mettinger, A. (eds) 2000. The History of English in a Social Context. Essays in Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, G. 1997. A Cultural History of the English Language. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Leith, D. 1983/1997. A Social History of English. Second edition. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Millward, C. M. 1989/1996/2012. A Biography of the English Language. Third edition. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, L. (ed.) 2006. The Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (eds) 1996. Sociolinguistics and Language History. Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (eds) 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics. Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. 1982. Socio-Historical Linguistics. Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. J. 1996. An Historical Study of English: A Dynamic Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J. 2010. Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics: Stories of Colonisation and Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar