Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Noun phrase complexity in Nigerian English: Syntactic function and length outweigh genre in predicting noun phrase complexity

Extract

Structural simplicity/complexity is an important variable with which New Englishes and native varieties are identified and conceptualised, but predicting such variation in complexity has received little attention in the literature. New Englishes, especially the outer circle varieties such as Nigerian or Indian English, differ in form and function from the inner circle varieties, such as British or American English, but the extent of such variation varies greatly and merits further investigation. According to Gorlach (1998), we should expect New Englishes to demonstrate simplification at the levels of morphology, lexis, and syntax. This has indeed been shown to be the case in some varieties, but it has also been shown that this variation differs according to different linguistic and non-linguistic factors. Most recently, Schilk and Schaub (2016) have shown how noun phrase (NP) structure can reveal the underlying structural simpification predicted in the New Englishes varieties. Brunner (2014) examined NP complexity across three New Englishes (British, Singaporean, and Kenyan English), explicating how grammars of the indigeneous languages in Singapore and Kenya influence NP simplicity/complexity.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aarts F. 1971. ‘On the distribution of noun-phrase types in English clause-structure.’ Lingua, 26, 281–93. doi: 10.1016/0024-3841(71)90013-1
Babalola E. T. 2010. Nominal Group in Standard Nigerian and American English: A Systemic Linguistics Description. Saarbrucken, Deutschland: Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG.
Behaghel O. 1909. ‘Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern.’ Indogermanische Forschungen, 25, 119142
Berlage E. 2014. Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139057684
Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S. & Finegan E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. 9th edn. Harlow: Longman.
Biber D., Conrad S. & Reppen R. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bresnan J., Cueni A., Nikitina T. & Baayen R. H. 2007. ‘Predicting the dative alternation.’ In Bouma G., Kramer I. and Zwarts J. (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, pp 6994.
Brunner T. 2014. ‘Structural nativization, typology and complexity: Noun phrase structures in British, Kenyan and Singaporean English.’ English Language and Linguistics, 18, 2348. doi: 10.1017/S1360674313000269
Cayer R. & Sacks R. 1979. ‘Oral and written discourse of basic writers: Similarities and differences.’ Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 121–28.
Crystal D. 2004. Rediscover Grammar. 3rd edn. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
De Haan P. 1993. ‘Sentence length in running text.’ In Souter C. & Atwell E. (eds.), Corpus-based Computational Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, p. 147161.
Gisborne N. 2003. ‘Relative clauses in Hong Kong English.’ World Englishes, 19, 357–71. doi: 10.1111/1467–971X.00184
Gorlach M. 1998. ‘Varieties of English world-wide: Where we stand.’ Links & Letters, 5, 1336.
Gut U. 2014. International Corpus of English (Nigeria). Online at <http://ice-corpora.net/ICE/INDEX.HTM> (Accessed March 1, 2016).
Hawkins J. A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier H. 2004. Analysing Real Texts: Research Studies in Modern English Language. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan.
Huddleston R. & Pullum G. K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson-Ettle O. & Nilsson T. 2002. ‘Orality and noun phrase structure in registers of British and Kenya English.’ ICAME Journal 26, 3362.
Jucker A. H. 1992. Social Stylistics: Syntactic Variation in British Newspapers. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kperogi F. A. 2015. Glocal English: The Changing Face and Forms of Nigerian English in a Global World. New York: Peter Lang Inc Publishers.
Labov W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pastor L. C. 2008. ‘English complex noun phrase interpretation by Spanish learners.’ RESLA, 21, 2744. Online at <hispadoc.es/descarga/articulo/2925910.pdf> (Accessed March 1, 2016).
Schilk M. & Schaub S. 2016. ‘Noun phrase complexity across varieties of English: Focus on syntactic function and text type.’ English World-Wide, 37(1), 5885.
Szmrecsanyi B. & Hinrichs L. 2008. ‘Probabilistic determinants of genitive variation in spoken and written English: A multivariate comparison across time, space and genres.’ In Nevalainen T., Taavitsainen I., Pahta P. and Korhonen M. (eds.), The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 291309.
Wasow T. 2002. Postverbal Behavior. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Today
  • ISSN: 0266-0784
  • EISSN: 1474-0567
  • URL: /core/journals/english-today
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 75 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 549 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 30th January 2017 - 19th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.