Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T07:54:23.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real and unreal, native and non-native

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Abstract

Two further comments on Thomas Clayton’s Real and unreal teachers in ET23 (Jul 90), from Man-Siu Yau in Hong Kong and Barbara Weissmann in Macau.

Type
Angles of Vision
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clayton, T. 1990. ‘Real and unreal teachers’. English Today, 23, 2731.Google Scholar
Edge, J. 1988. ‘Natives, speakers, and models’. JALT Journal, 9(2), 153157.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Education Commission. 1984. Education Commission Report No. 1. Hong Kong: Government printer.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 1988. ‘International English: towards a viable target grammar of English for international communication.’ Paper presented at the First Hong Kong Conference on Language and Society.April,Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Newbrook, M. 1988. ‘English syntax and lexis in Singapore and Hong Kong – shared features and points of difference’. Paper presented at the First Hong Kong Conference on Language and Society.April,Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. 1981. ‘International communication and the concept of Nuclear English’. In Smith, L. (Ed), English for Cross-cultural Communication. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. 1990. ‘Language varieties and standard language’. English Today, 21, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar