Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T07:08:25.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduplication in Indian Pidgin English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Abstract

A report on a distinguishing feature of the disputed but nonetheless vigorous Pidgin English of India

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbi, Anvita. 1992. Reduplication in South Asian Languages. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Copperud, Roy H. 1982. Webster's Dictionary of Usage and Style. New York: Avenel Books.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G, ed. 1980. Pidgin and Creole Languages: Essays in Memory of John E. Renecke. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Hall, B. A. 1943. Melanesian Pidgin English Grammar, Texts, Vocabulary. Baltimore: M. D. Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Holm, John. 1988. Pidgins and Creoles. Vols. 1 & 2 (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1971. Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1983. The Indianization of English. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. ‘Reduplicative Constructions.’ In Joseph, Greenberg, ed., Universals of Human Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 1980. ‘Tolai and Tok Pisin.Canberra: Pacific Linguistics B-73.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1971. ‘Salient and Substantive Pidginization.’ In Hymes 1971.Google Scholar
Todd, Loreto. 1984. Modern Englishes: Pidgins and Creoles. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar