Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:56:15.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Green national accounting: why and how?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2000

GEIR B. ASHEIM
GEIR B. ASHEIM
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1095 Blindern, N–0317 Oslo, Norway; Phone: +47 2285 5498; Fax: +47 2285 5035; E-mail: g.b.asheim@econ.uio.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present paper gives an overview of the theory of green national accounting. Three purposes of green national accounting (measurement of welfare equivalent income, sustainable income, or net social profit) and two measures (Green NNP and wealth equivalent income) are considered. Under the assumption of no exogenous technological progress, Green NNP is shown to equal wealth equivalent income if there is a constant interest rate or if consumption is constant. It is established as a general result that sustainable income [les ] wealth equivalent income [les ] welfare equivalent income, while Green NNP [les ] welfare equivalent income under no exogenous technological progress and a constant utility discount rate. Green NNP is shown to measure gross social profit rather than net social profit.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 25 - 48
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: I wish to thank CES, University of Munich, and the Norwegian Reasearch Council (Ruhrgas grant) for hospitality and support during this research, Kjell Arne Brekke, Wolfgang Buchholz, John Hartwick, Atle Seierstad and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions, and John Pezzey and Jeffrey Vincent for many detailed and useful comments. I am also grateful to Partha Dasgupta and Martin Weitzman for inspiring some of the analysis of the present paper by having made available their correspondence on green national accounting during the fall of 1997, and for commenting on an earlier version.