Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T19:41:38.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does ‘going green’ promote global value chain integration?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2025

Mariam Fayek  and
Chahir Zaki Open the ORCID record for Chahir Zaki [Opens in a new window]
Mariam Fayek
Affiliation:
Paris School of Economics, Paris, France
Chahir Zaki*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d’Economie d’Orléans, University of Orléans, Economic Research Forum, Orléans, France
*
Corresponding author: Chahir Zaki; Email: chahir.zaki@univ-orleans.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the impact of environmentally oriented investments on firms’ integration into global value chains (GVCs). We use firm-level data in 41 countries from the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey dataset and control for selection and endogeneity bias. Our findings reveal that the adoption of environmental protection actions boosts firms’ participation in GVCs. Measures reducing air pollution, followed by waste minimization techniques and energy management tools, yield the highest impact at both margins. Larger firms are more likely to experience a rise in their chances of participating in GVCs compared to their smaller counterparts. At the sectoral level, dirty sectors (such as plastics, construction and chemicals) are less likely to witness the positive impact of environment-friendly measures on GVC integration, given their production techniques that are CO2 and energy intensive. Finally, at the regional level, the effect of such environmental measures is more pronounced for firms located in European Union countries.

Keywords

environmental performancefirmsglobal value chainsinternational tradePorter hypothesis

JEL classification

Q56: Environment and Development • Environment and Trade • Sustainability • Environmental Accounts and Accounting • Environmental Equity • Population Growth F12: Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies • Fragmentation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , First View , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achabou, MA, Dekhili, S and Hamdoun, M (2017) Environmental upgrading of developing country firms in global value chains. Business Strategy and the Environment 26, 224–238.10.1002/bse.1911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agostino, M, Giunta, A, Ruberto, S and Scalera, D (2023) Global value chains and energy-related sustainable practices. Evidence from Enterprise Survey data. Energy Economics 127, 107068.10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambec, S, Cohen, MA, Elgie, S and Lanoie, P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 7, 2–22.10.1093/reep/res016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonietti, R and Marzucchi, A (2014) Green tangible investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation. Ecological Economics 108, 150–161.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antras, P and Helpman, E (2004) Global sourcing. Journal of Political Economy 112, 552–580.10.1086/383099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghin, J, Maertens, M and Swinnen, JFM (2015) Non-tariff measures and standards in trade and global value chains. Annual Review of Resource Economics 7, 425–450.10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-124917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, E and Bui, LT (2001) Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries. Review of Economics and Statistics 83, 498–510.10.1162/00346530152480144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmann, P (2000) Effects of ‘best practices’ of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal 43, 663–680.10.2307/1556360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieślik, A, Michałek, JJ and Szczygielski, K (2019) What matters for firms’ participation in global value chains in Central and East European countries? Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 14, 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, J, Lapan, H and Moschini, G (2012) Are exporters more environmentally friendly than non-exporters? Theory and evidence. Iowa State University, Department of Economics. Available at https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/22546 (accessed 25 January 2024).Google Scholar
Cui, J, Lapan, H and Moschini, G (2016) Productivity, export, and environmental performance: Air pollutants in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98, 447–467.10.1093/ajae/aav066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dangelico, RM and Pontrandolfo, P (2015) Being ‘green and competitive’: The impact of environmental actions and collaborations on firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 24, 413–430.10.1002/bse.1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, MA and Pekovic, S (2013) Environmental standards and labor productivity: Understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability. Journal of Organizational Behavior 34, 230–252.10.1002/job.1827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovis, M and Zaki, C (2020) Global value chains and local business environments: Which factors really matter in developing countries? Review of Industrial Organization 57, 481–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsayed, K and Paton, D (2005) The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16, 395–412.10.1016/j.strueco.2004.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, AM, Kee, HL and Winkler, D (2022) Determinants of global value chain participation: Cross-country evidence. The World Bank Economic Review 36, 329–360.10.1093/wber/lhab017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galdeano‐Gómez, E (2010) Exporting and environmental performance: A firm‐level productivity analysis. World Economy 33, 60–88.10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girma, S, Hanley, A and Tintelnot, F (2008) Exporting and the environment: A new look with micro-data. Kiel Working Papers No. 1423, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.Google Scholar
Golgeci, I, Makhmadshoev, D and Demirbag, M (2021) Global value chains and the environmental sustainability of emerging market firms: A systematic review of literature and research agenda. International Business Review 30, 101857.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, MN, Kónya, L and Mátyás, L (2002) Modelling the impact of environmental regulations on bilateral trade flows: OECD, 1990–1996. The World Economy 25, 387–405.10.1111/1467-9701.00438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, SL and Ahuja, G (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 5, 30–37.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199603)5:1<30::AID-BSE38>3.0.CO;2-Q3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, D, Jiao, J, Tang, Y, Han, X and Sun, H (2021) The effect of global value chain position on green technology innovation efficiency: From the perspective of environmental regulation. Ecological Indicators 121, 107195.10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA (2018) Energy management systems and digital technologies for industrial energy efficiency and productivity. Report from IEA Workshop on 12 and 13 December 2017. IEA Publications.Google Scholar
Khan, M and Ozturk, I (2021) Examining the direct and indirect effects of financial development on CO2 emissions for 88 developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management 293, 112812.10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnan, A, De Marchi, V and Ponte, S (2023) Environmental upgrading and downgrading in global value chains: A framework for analysis. Economic Geography 99, 25–50.10.1080/00130095.2022.2100340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, G and Lister, J (2021) The hidden costs of global supply chain solutions. Review of International Political Economy 29, 669–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W, Shao, X, De Sisto, M and Li, WH (2021) A new approach for addressing endogeneity issues in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance. Finance Research Letters 39, 101623.10.1016/j.frl.2020.101623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magacho, G, Espagne, E and Godin, A (2024) Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: Consequences for developing countries. Climate Policy 24, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, VD, Maria, ED and Micelli, S (2013) Environmental strategies, upgrading and competitive advantage in global value chains. Business Strategy and the Environment 22, 62–72.10.1002/bse.1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71, 1695–1725.10.1111/1468-0262.00467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadvi, K (2008) Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography 8, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, A and Rahman, MM (2024) Global value chains participation and environmental degradation in SAARC economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability 26, 15595–15617.10.1007/s10668-023-03265-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, B and Vu, N (2024) Does intrinsic motivation or extrinsic pressure matter more? An exploratory study of small businesses going green and innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment 33, 3855–3886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2019) Measuring distortions in international markets: The semiconductor value chain. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 234. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Paschoaleto, RDL and Martínez-Zarzoso, I (2024) Environmental regulations and firms’ integration in global markets: Using a new environmental performance index. Empirica 51, 829–876.10.1007/s10663-024-09612-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, ME and van der Linde, C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 97–118.10.1257/jep.9.4.97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D (2018) New technologies, global value chains, and developing economies. NBER Working Paper No. w25164. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.10.3386/w25164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewers, S, Martínez-Zarzoso, I and Baghdadi, L (2024) Global value chains and firms’ environmental performance. World Development 173, 106395.10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J and Yogo, M (2005) Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many instruments. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg 6, 109–120.10.1017/CBO9780511614491.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockholm Environment Institute and Climate and Clean Air Coalition (2022) A Practical Guide for Business Air Pollutant Emission Assessment. Available at https://www.ccacoalition.org/resources/practical-guide-business-air-pollutant-emission-assessment (accessed 31 March 2025).Google Scholar
Urata, S and Baek, Y (2020) The determinants of participation in global value chains: A cross-country, firm-level analysis. ADBI Working Paper 1116. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.Google Scholar
Wang, S, He, Y and Song, M (2021) Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management 277, 110999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeaple, SR (2009) Firm heterogeneity and the structure of US multinational activity. Journal of International Economics 78, 206–215.10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fayek and Zaki supplementary material

Fayek and Zaki supplementary material
Download Fayek and Zaki supplementary material(File)
File 263.9 KB