Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T14:02:46.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of reducing the pre-harvest burning of sugar cane on respiratory health in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2014

Alexandre C. Nicolella
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, FEARP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14040-900, Brazil. E-mail: anicolella@fearp.usp.br
Walter Belluzzo
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. E-mail: belluzzo@usp.br

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effect of reducing pre-harvest burning of sugar cane on the population's respiratory health in Brazil. We collected data for the municipalities in the state of São Paulo for two different periods: 2000, before the state law requiring the gradual elimination of sugar cane area utilizing pre-burning, and 2007. We used panel models for inpatient visits due to respiratory diseases, outpatient visits for inhalation procedures and length of stay for inpatient visits due to respiratory diseases, controlling for the endogeneity between health and pollution. The results show that increasing the area of raw sugar cane harvested reduces the number of inpatient visits and does not affect the number of inhalation procedures or length of stay.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguiar, D.A., Rudorff, B.F.T., Adami, M., and Shimabukuro, Y.E. (2009), ‘Imagens de sensoriamento remoto no monitoramento da colheita da cana-de-açúcar’, Engenharia Agrícola 29(3): 440451.Google Scholar
Allen, A., Cardoso, A., and da Rocha, G. (2004), ‘Influence of sugar cane burning on aerosol soluble ion composition in Southeastern Brazil’, Atmospheric Environment 38(30): 50255038.Google Scholar
Andrade, S.J., Cristale, J., Silva, F.S., Zocolo, G.J., and Marchi, M.R. (2010), ‘Contribution of sugar-cane harvesting season to atmospheric contamination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Araraquara city, Southeast Brazil’, Atmospheric Environment 44, 29132919.Google Scholar
ANFAVEA (2010), ‘Brazilian automotive production’, Historical data, Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Arbex, M., Böhm, G., Saldiva, P. III, Conceição, A.P.G. and Braga, A. (2000), ‘Assessment of the effects of sugar cane plantation burning on daily counts of inhalation therapy’, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 50: 17451749.Google Scholar
Arbex, M.A., Martins, L.C., de Oliveira, R.C., Pereira, L.A.A., Arbex, F.F., Cançado, J.E.D., Saldiva, P.H.N., and Braga, A.L.F. (2007), ‘Air pollution from biomass burning and asthma hospital admissions in a sugar cane plantation area in Brazil’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61(5): 395400.Google Scholar
Börjesson, P. (2009), ‘Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective – what determines this?’, Applied Energy 86(5): 589594.Google Scholar
Braga, A.L., Conceição, G.M., Pereira, L.A., Kishi, H.S., Pereira, J.C., Andrade, M.F., Gonçalves, F.L., Saldiva, P.H., and Latorre, M.R. (1999), ‘Air pollution and pediatric respiratory hospital admissions in São Paulo, Brazil’, Journal of Environmental Medicine 1(2): 95102.Google Scholar
Cançado, J.E.D., Saldiva, P.H.N., Pereira, L.A.A., Lara, L.B.L.S., Artaxo, P., Martinelli, L.A., Arbex, M.A., Zanobetti, A., and Braga, A.L.F. (2006), ‘The impact of sugar cane burning emissions on the respiratory system of children and the elderly.’, Environmental Health Perspectives 114(5): 725729.Google Scholar
CIIAGRO (2010), Centro Integrado de Informações Agrometeorológicas (Center of Agrometeorological Information), Technical Report, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Crutzen, P.J., Mosier, A.R., Smith, K.A., and Winiwarter, W. (2008), ‘N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels’, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8(2): 389395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DATASUS (2010), Informações de Saúde, Technical report, Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
EIA (2006), International Energy Outlook, Report, Energy Information Administration, D.F. Brasilia, Brazil.Google Scholar
EPE (2010), Balanço Energético Nacional 2010, Technical Report, Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, Ministério de Minas e Energia, D.F. Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Farhat, S., Paulo, R., Shimoda, T., Conceição, G., Lin, C., Braga, A., Warth, M., and Saldiva, P. (2005), ‘Effect of air pollution on pediatric respiratory emergency room visits and hospital admissions’, Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 38(2): 227235.Google Scholar
Giampietro, M., Ulgiati, S., and Pimentel, D. (1997), ‘Feasibility of large-scale biofuel production – does an enlargement of scale change the picture?’, Bioscience 47(9): 587600.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, F., Carvalho, L., Conde, F., Latorre, M., Saldiva, P., and Braga, A. (2005), ‘The effects of air pollution and meteorological parameters on respiratory morbidity during the summer in São Paulo city’, Environment International 31(3): 343349.Google Scholar
Gunkel, G., Kosmol, J., Sobral, M., Rohn, H., Montenegro, S., and Aureliano, J. (2007), ‘Sugar cane industry as a source of water pollution – case study on the situation in Ipojuca river, Pernambuco, Brazil’, Water Air and Soil Pollution 180(1–4): 261269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBGE (2010a), Censo Agropecuário, Historical data, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
IBGE (2010b), Pesquisa Agropecuário Municipal, Historical data, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
IPEADATA (2010), ‘Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor’, Technical Report, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.Google Scholar
Lara, L., Artaxo, P., Martinelli, L., Camargo, P., Victoria, R., and Ferraz, E. (2005), ‘Properties of aerosols from sugar-cane burning emissions in Southeastern Brazil’, Atmospheric Environment 39(26): 46274637.Google Scholar
Mazzoli-Rocha, F., Magalhães, C.B., Malm, O., Saldiva, P.H.N., Zin, W.A., and Faffe, D.S. (2008), ‘Comparative respiratory toxicity of particles produced by traffic and sugar cane burning’, Environmental Research 108(1): 3541.Google Scholar
Moreira, J.R. (2000), ‘Sugarcane for energy – recent results and progress in Brazil’, Energy for Sustainable Development 4(3): 4354.Google Scholar
Moreira, J.R. and Goldemberg, J. (1999), ‘The alcohol program’, Energy Policy 27(4): 229245.Google Scholar
Oliveira, M.E. D.d., Vaughan, B.E., and Rykiel, E.J. Jr. (2005), ‘Ethanol as fuel: energy, carbon dioxide balances, and ecological footprint.’, Bioscience 55(7): 593602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, H. (2008), ‘Queimadas de cana-de-açúcar no Brasil: efeitos à saúde respiratória’, Revista de Saúde Pública 42: 370376.Google Scholar
Roseiro, M.N.V. and Angela, M.M.T. (2006), ‘Morbidade por problemas respiratórios em Ribeirão Preto (SP) de 1995 a 2001, segundo indicadores ambientais, sociais e econômicos’, Revista Paulista de Pediatria 24(2): 163170.Google Scholar
SEADE (2010), Informações dos municípios paulistas – imp, Technical report, Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Sicard, P., Mangin, A., Hebel, P., and Malléa, P. (2010), ‘Detection and estimation trends linked to air quality and mortality on French Riviera over the 1990–2005 period’, Science of the Total Environment 408(8): 19431950.Google Scholar
SMA (2010), Colheita mecanizada – projeto CANASAT, Technical Report, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Uriarte, M., Yackulic, C.B., Cooper, T., Flynn, D., Cortes, M., Crk, T., Cullman, G., McGinty, M., and Sircely, J. (2009), ‘Expansion of sugarcane production in São Paulo, Brazil: implications for fire occurrence and respiratory health’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 132(1–2): 4856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar