Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Impacts of Bt cotton on profitability, productivity and farm inputs in Pakistan: use of panel models

  • Khuda Bakhsh (a1)

This study estimates the benefits from adopting Bt cotton seeds in Punjab, Pakistan over two cropping seasons - 2008 and 2009. The study uses the panel modeling approach to determine the average effects of Bt cotton technology on short-run profits, yields and farm inputs. This approach controls for biases resulting from self-selection and endogenous farm inputs. The study shows that, on average, Bt adopting farmers receive 9 per cent higher yields per hectare (ha), reduce per-ha pesticide use by 21.7 per cent, and increase per-ha use of irrigation water by 6 per cent. Our estimates of the increase in cotton yield are far below estimates from previous studies conducted in Pakistan and India, which do not use panel methods. Allowing more Bt cotton varieties and ensuring the availability of quality Bt cotton seeds in the market is likely to lead to further increase in the private benefits from Bt cotton.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Ali and A. Abdulai (2010), ‘The adoption of genetically modified cotton and poverty reduction in Pakistan’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(1): 175192.

J.M. Antle , D.C. Cole , and C.C. Crissman (1998), ‘Further evidence on pesticides, productivity and farmer health: potato production in Ecuador’, Agricultural Economics 18(2): 199207.

R. Bennett , Y. Ismael , S. Morse , and B. Shankar (2004), ‘Reductions in insecticide use from adoption of Bt cotton in South Africa: impacts on economic performance and toxic load to the environment’, Journal of Agricultural Science 142(6): 665674.

B. Crost , B. Shankar , R. Bennett , and S. Morse (2007), ‘Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: evidence from Indian data’, Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1): 2436.

Y. Gong , K. Baylis , R. Kozak , and G. Bull (2016), ‘Farmers’ risk preferences and pesticide use decisions: evidence from field experiments in China’, Agricultural Economics 47(4): 111.

J. Huang , S. Rozelle , C. Pray , and Q. Wang (2002), ‘Plant biotechnology in China’, Science 295(5555): 674677.

S. Kouser and M. Qaim (2011), ‘Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: a panel data analysis’, Ecological Economics 70(11): 21052113.

S. Kouser and M. Qaim (2014), ‘Bt cotton, damage control, and optimal levels of pesticide use in Pakistan’, Environment and Development Economics 19(6): 704723.

E.M. Liu and J. Huang (2013), ‘Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China’, Journal of Development Economics 103: 202215.

J.R. Park , I. McFarlane , R.H. Phipps , and G. Ceddia (2011), ‘The role of transgenic crops in sustainable development’, Plant Biotechnology Journal 9(1): 221.

C.E. Pray , J. Huang , R. Hu , and S. Rozelle (2002), ‘Five years of Bt cotton in China – the benefits continue’, Plant Journal 31(4): 423430.

M. Qaim and A. de Janvry (2005), ‘Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects’, Environment and Development Economics 10(2): 179200.

M. Qaim and D. Zilberman (2003), ‘Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries’, Science 299(5608): 900902.

M. Qaim , A. Subramanian , N. Gopal , and D. Zilberman (2006), ‘Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: insights from India’, Review of Agricultural Economics 28(1): 4858.

J.H. Stock , J.H. Wright , and M. Yogo (2002), ‘A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20(4): 518529.

A. Subramanian and M. Qaim (2010), ‘The impact of Bt cotton on poor households in rural India’, Journal of Development Studies 46(2): 295311.

K. Wu , Y. Lu , H. Feng , Y. Jiang , and J. Zhao (2008), ‘Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in China in areas with Bt cotton toxin-containing cotton’, Science 321(5896): 16761678.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environment and Development Economics
  • ISSN: 1355-770X
  • EISSN: 1469-4395
  • URL: /core/journals/environment-and-development-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 320 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 27th April 2017 - 23rd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.