Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:42:39.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population and geography do matter for sustainable development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2018

Davide La Torre ,
Danilo Liuzzi  and
Simone Marsiglio
Davide La Torre
Affiliation:
University of Milan, Department of Economics, Management, and Quantitative Methods, Milan, Italy University of Dubai, Dubai Business School, Dubai, UAE
Danilo Liuzzi
Affiliation:
University of Milan, Department of Economics, Management, and Quantitative Methods, Milan, Italy
Simone Marsiglio*
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Wollongong, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: simonem@uow.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyze the spatio-temporal dynamics of a simple model of macroeconomic geography in which demography and pollution dynamics mutually affect each other. Pollution, by reducing the carrying capacity of the natural environment – which determines the maximum amount of people a given location can effectively bear – crucially affects labor force dynamics which in turn alter the amount of resources available for abatement activities aiming to reduce pollution. Such mutual links determine the eventual sustainability of the development process in different locations and economies, and spatial interactions further complicate the picture. We show that neglecting the existence of mutual feedback between population and pollution leads to misleading conclusions about the eventual sustainability of a specific location. We also show that even neglecting the existence of spatial externalities can lead to misleading conclusions about the sustainability of different regions in the spatial economy. This suggests thus that both the nature of the population and pollution relationship and geographical factors may play a critical role in the process of sustainable development.

Keywords

Geographypopulationpollutionspatial dynamicssustainable development

JEL classification

J10: General O40: General C60: General Q50: General
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 201 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berck, P, Levy, A and Chowdhury, K (2012) An analysis of the world's environment and population dynamics with varying carrying capacity, concerns and skepticism. Ecological Economics 73, 103–112.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R, Camacho, C and Zou, B (2009) Bridging the gap between growth theory and economic geography: the spatial Ramsey model. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13, 20–45.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R, Camacho, C and Fabbri, G (2013a) On the optimal control of some parabolic differential equations arising in economics. Serdica Mathematical Journal 39, 331–354.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R, Camacho, C and Fabbri, G (2013b) Spatial dynamics and convergence: the spatial AK model. Journal of Economic Theory 148, 2719–2736.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R, Martinez, B and Ruiz-Tamarit, JR (2014) Optimal sustainable policies under pollution ceiling: the demographic side. Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena 9, 38–64.Google Scholar
Brito, P (2004) The dynamics of growth and distribution in a spatially heterogeneous world. UECE-ISEG, Technical University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Brock, WA and Xepapadeas, A (2008) Diffusion-induced instability and pattern formation in infinite horizon recursive optimal control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32, 2745–2787.Google Scholar
Brock, WA and Xepapadeas, A (2010) Pattern formations, spatial externalities and regulation in a coupled economic–ecological system. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59, 149–164.Google Scholar
Brock, WA, Engstrom, G and Xepapadeas, A (2014a) Spatial climate–economic models in the design of optimal climate policies across locations. European Economic Review 69, 78–103.Google Scholar
Brock, WA, Xepapadeas, A and Yannacopoulos, AN (2014b) Optimal control in space and time and the management of environmental resources. Annual Review of Resource Economics 6, 33–68.Google Scholar
Camacho, C and Pérez-Barahona, A (2015) Land use dynamics and the environment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 52, 96–118.Google Scholar
Camacho, C and Zou, B (2004) The spatial Solow model. Economics Bulletin 18, 1–11.Google Scholar
Camacho, C, Zou, B and Briani, M (2008) On the dynamics of capital accumulation across space. European Journal of Operational Research 186(2), 451–465.Google Scholar
de la Croix, D and Gosseries, A (2012) The natalist bias of pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63, 271–287.Google Scholar
Friedman, A (2008) Partial Differential Equations of Parabolic Type. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Hallegatte, S, Bangalore, M, Bonzanigo, L, Fay, M, Kane, T, Narloch, U, Rozenberg, J, Treguer, D and Vogt-Schilb, A (2016) Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H (1929) Stability in competition. Economic Journal 39, 41–57.Google Scholar
Kahn, H, Brown, W and Martel, L (1976) The Next 200 Years: A Scenario for America and the World. New York, NY: Quill.Google Scholar
Krugman, P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99, 483–499.Google Scholar
La Torre, D, Liuzzi, D and Marsiglio, S (2015) Pollution diffusion and abatement activities across space and over time. Mathematical Social Sciences 78, 48–63.Google Scholar
La Torre, D, Liuzzi, D and Marsiglio, S (2017) Pollution control under uncertainty and sustainability concern. Environmental and Resource Economics 67, 885–903.Google Scholar
Malthus, TR (1798) An Essay on the Principle of Population. London, UK: J. Johnson, in St. Paul's Church-yard. Available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Malthus/malPopCover.html.Google Scholar
Marsiglio, S (2011) On the relationship between population change and sustainable development. Research in Economics 65, 353–364.Google Scholar
Marsiglio, S (2017) A simple endogenous growth model with endogenous fertility and environmental concern. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 64, 263–282.Google Scholar
Nerlove, M (1991) Population and the environment: a parable of firewood and other tales. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 1334–1347.Google Scholar
Panayotou, T (2000) Population and environment. Working Paper 54, Center for International Development at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Polyanin, AD (2002) Handbook of Linear Partial Differential Equations for Engineers and Scientists. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Solow, RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65–94.Google Scholar
Solow, RM (1974) Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies 41, 29–45.Google Scholar
Stokey, N (1998) Are there limits to growth? International Economic Review 39, 1–31.Google Scholar
UN (2005) 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution A/60/1, adopted by the General Assembly on 15 September 2005. Available at http://data.unaids.org/Topics/......UniversalAccess/worldsummitoutcome_resolution_24oct2005_en.pdf.Google Scholar
UNEP (2012) The future we want – Rio+20 outcome document. Available at http://www.uncsd2012.org/thefuturewewant.html.Google Scholar
UNFPA (2012) Population matters for sustainable development. Available at https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/......UNFPA%20Population%20matters%20for%20sustainable%20development_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Verhulst, PF (1838) Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement. Correspondance Mathmatique et Physique 10, 113–121 (in French).Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xepapadeas, A (2005) Economic growth and the environment. In Mäler, KG and Vincent, J (eds), Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 3, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 1219–1271.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

La Torre et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download La Torre et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 77.4 KB