Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    O'Rourke, Sharon M. Angers, Denis A. Holden, Nicholas M. and McBratney, Alex B. 2015. Soil organic carbon across scales. Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, Issue. 10, p. 3561.


    Pannell, David J. Llewellyn, Rick S. and Corbeels, Marc 2014. The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 187, p. 52.


    Benessaiah, Karina 2012. Carbon and livelihoods in Post-Kyoto: Assessing voluntary carbon markets. Ecological Economics, Vol. 77, p. 1.


    Dulal, Hari Bansha Brodnig, Gernot and Shah, Kalim U. 2011. Capital assets and institutional constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Mandlebaum, S. and Nriagu, J. 2011. Encyclopedia of Environmental Health.


    ×

Poverty, risk, and the supply of soil carbon sequestration

  • JOSHUA GRAFF-ZIVIN (a1) and LESLIE LIPPER (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004300
  • Published online: 01 June 2008
Abstract
ABSTRACT

We explore poor farmers' incentives to adopt production systems that increase soil carbon sequestration, focusing on the impact of risk. A dynamic optimization model of conservation agriculture adoption is presented, where farmers optimize over expected utility of profits from agriculture and carbon sequestration. Adoption impacts on agricultural productivity are modeled as a combination of the technological effects of the new system, and productivity effects of changes in soil carbon on agricultural output. Comparative static results indicate increases in soil carbon sequestration price and the discount rate have unambiguous impacts on equilibrium soil carbon levels; the former leading to higher, and the latter to lower, carbon levels. Increases in the price of agricultural output and risk aversion have ambiguous impacts, depending on the relative strength of the productivity and technology effects. The paper concludes with a discussion of designing soil carbon payment mechanisms to benefit low income farmers.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Antle, J.M. and C.C. Crissman (1990), ‘Risk, efficiency, and the adoption of modern crop varieties: evidence from the Philippines’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 38: 517537.

J.M. Antle and B. Diagana 2003, ‘Creating incentives for the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in developing countries: the role of soil carbon sequestration’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 11781184.

Z. Bar-Shira , R. Just , and D. Zilberman 1997, ‘Estimation of farmers’ risk attitude: an econometric approach’, Agricultural Economics 17: 211222.

B. Diagana , J. Antle , J. Stoorvogel , and K. Gray 2007, ‘Economic potential for soil carbon sequestration in the Nioro region of Senegal's peanut basin’, Agricultural Systems 94: 2637.

G. Feder , R. Just , and D. Zilberman 1985, ‘Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 255298.

G. Feder and G. O'Mara 1981, ‘Farm size and the diffusion of Green Revolution technology’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 30: 5976.

D. Hennessy 1997, ‘Stochastic technologies and the adoption decision’, Journal of Development Economics 54: 437453.

R.E. Just 1974, ‘An investigation of the importance of risk in farmers’ decisions’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56: 1425.

R. Just and R. Pope 1978, ‘Stochastic specification of production functions and economic implications’, Journal of Econometrics 7: 6786.

R. Lal 2004, ‘Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security’, Science 304: 16231626.

E. Lawrance 1991, ‘Poverty and the rate of time preference: evidence from panel data’, The Journal of Political Economy 99: 5477.

M. Ogaki and A. Atkeson 1997, ‘Rate of time preference, intertemporal elasticity of substitution, and level of wealth’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 79: 564572.

S. Pagiola , A. Arcenas , and G. Platais 2005, ‘Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America’, World Development 33: 327353.

C. Perez , C. Roncoli , C. Neely , and J.L. Steiner 2007, ‘Can carbon sequestration markets benefit low-income producers in semi-arid Africa? Potentials and challenges’, Agricultural Systems 94: 212.

J.N. Pretty , A.D. Noble , D. Bossio , J. Dixon , R.E. Hine , F.W.T Penning deVries , and J.I.L. Morison 2006, ‘Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries’, Environmental Science and Technology 40: 11141119.

L. Ringius 2002, ‘Soil carbon sequestration and the CDM: opportunities and challenges for Africa’, Climatic Change 54: 471495.

B. Shiferaw and S. Holden 1999, ‘Soil erosion and smallholders’ conservation decisions in the highlands of Ethiopia’, World Development 27: 739752.

G. Shively 1997, ‘Consumption risk, farm characteristics and soil conservation adoption among low-income farmers in the Phillipines’, Agricultural Economics 17: 165177.

L.L. Tieszen , G.G. Tappan , and A. Touré 2004, ‘Sequestration of carbon in soil organic matter in Senegal: an overview’, Journal of Arid Environments 59: 409425.

N. Uri 1997, ‘Conservation tillage and input use’, Environmental Geology 29: 188201.

R. Zentner , S. Tessier , M. Peru , F. Dyck , and C. Campbell 1991, ‘Economics of tillage systems for spring wheat production in southwestern Saskatchewan’, Soil and Tillage Research 21: 225242.

J. Zivin , B. Hueth , and D. Zilberman 2000, ‘Managing a multiple use resource: the case of feral pig management in California rangeland’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39: 189204.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environment and Development Economics
  • ISSN: 1355-770X
  • EISSN: 1469-4395
  • URL: /core/journals/environment-and-development-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×