Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-bm2hd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-10T23:18:51.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

To fish or not to fish? Resource degradation and income diversification in Benin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Nik Stoop
Affiliation:
Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, University of Leuven, Waaistraat 6, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp; and Research Foundation Flanders. E-mail: nik.stoop@kuleuven.be
Romain Houssa
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Economic Development & Centre for Research in Finance and Management, University of Namur; and Centre for Economic Studies, University of Leuven. E-mail: romain.houssa@unamur.be
Marijke Verpoorten
Affiliation:
Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp; and Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, University of Leuven. E-mail: marijke.verpoorten@uantwerpen.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors study the impact of natural resource degradation on income diversification in Beninese fishing communities. Using survey data and econometric analysis, they show that fishermen are more likely to diversify their income when the degradation of the fish stock is more severe. However, the level of income diversification that they find is surprisingly low and far from sufficient to relieve the stress on the lakes. The latter relates to low levels of formal education among fishermen and the unregulated use of highly productive, but damaging, fishing gear. These two factors result in a high return to fishing relative to non-fishing activities, even amid degradation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Relationship between degradation and income diversification (ID)

Notes: Panel A represents the hypothesized relationship between the degradation of common property resources and income diversification that follows from Dasgupta's (Dasgupta 1993: 477–511) model of labour market participation. Panel B offers an overview of the channels that could yield a positive relationship between natural resource degradation and income diversification in our sample area. Channel 1 follows from Dasgupta's (Dasgupta 1993) model. Channels 2 and 3 crucially depend on non-convexities in production, such as fixed costs and missing credit markets – if not, earning higher incomes would not be a necessity to invest in outside options or productive fishing gear. In addition, both channels 2 and 3 embody a failure of common-pool resource management as they entail the intensive use of productive but highly damaging fishing instruments.
Figure 1

Figure 2. Location of the sampling area and the three main lakes of southern Benin

Notes: Our sample area comprises three communes (Kpomassè, Sô-Ava and Aguégués), located at the three main lakes of Benin (Lake Ahémé, Lake Nokoué and Porto Novo lagoon).
Figure 2

Table 1. Village-level self-reported degradation (%)

Figure 3

Table 2. Mean income diversification

Figure 4

Figure 3. Average daily income (US$), by sector

Notes: The graphs represent the average daily income (in US$) for the following income categories (in order of appearance): fishing, self-employment, petty trade and agriculture. Wage employment is not considered due to the low number of observations (n = 4). A t-test indicates a statistically significant difference in average daily income for fishing (p-value = 0.00) between panels A and B. As the use of acadja and konou is prohibited at Lake Ahémé, these graphs only include observations from Lake Nokoué and Porto-Novo lagoon.
Figure 5

Table 3. Determinants of income diversification, marginal effects

Figure 6

Table 4. Expansion of the analysis using Benin's 2006 fisheries census

Supplementary material: PDF

Stoop supplementary material S1

Online Appendix

Download Stoop supplementary material S1(PDF)
PDF 431.2 KB