Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Interdisciplinary training in environmental conservation: definitions, progress and future directions

  • HELEN NEWING (a1)
Summary

The development of interdisciplinary approaches to environmental conservation is obviously related to interdisciplinary training in undergraduate and postgraduate conservation-oriented degree programmes. This paper therefore examines interdisciplinary training in environmental conservation, with a focus on conservation biology. The specific objectives are: (1) to analyse debates about the nature of ‘interdisciplinarity’ in conservation biology; (2) to examine the status of interdisciplinary training in current academic programmes in conservation biology; and (3) to make recommendations in terms of interdisciplinary or other non-natural science content that should be prioritized for inclusion in the curriculum. The term ‘interdisciplinarity’ has been used in relation to conservation training to refer to (1) any social science content; (2) vocational skills training; (3) integrative or practice-based exercises, sometimes with no indication of disciplinary content; (4) the (variously defined) ‘human dimensions’ of conservation, and (5) interaction between different academic disciplines (usually crossing the natural science–social science divide). In terms of training, the natural sciences have remained predominant in almost all reported academic programmes, but there now appears to be more coverage of non-natural science issues than previously. However the lack of consistency in the use of terms makes it difficult to assess progress. Further debate about curriculum development in conservation would be aided greatly by recognizing the distinction between the different aspects of non-natural science training, and treating each of them in its own right. Most degree programmes in environment-related disciplines specialize to varying degrees either in the natural sciences or the social sciences, and a comprehensive programme covering both of these in depth is likely to be problematic. However, some understanding of different disciplinary perspectives is increasingly important in a career in environmental conservation, and it is argued that, as a minimum, a primarily natural science-based undergraduate programme in environmental conservation should include: (1) an introduction to social science perspectives on the environment; (2) basic training in social science methods, research design and science theory; (3) vocational skills training, to the extent that it can be built into existing curricular components; and (4) integrative problem-solving tasks that can be used in relation to any or all of the above. A similar list could be constructed for social science-based environmental degree programmes, incorporating some basic training in natural science perspectives. Postgraduate training programmes are more varied in what they aim to achieve in terms of disciplinary breadth; they can develop students’ existing specialist expertise, offer supplementary training to allow students to increase the disciplinary breadth of their expertise, or focus on the issue of interdisciplinarity itself.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Helen Newing Tel: + 44 1227 827034 Fax: + 44 1227 827289 e-mail: H.S.Newing@kent.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Barry, A., Born, G. & Weszkalnys, G. (2008) Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37: 2049.
Berkson, J. & Harrison, A.-L. (2001) An integrative capstone course for the conservation biology curriculum. Conservation Biology 15: 14612001.
Bonine, K., Reid, J. & Dalzen, R. (2003) Training and education for tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 17: 12091218.
Bradshaw, C., Brook, B. & McMahon, C. (2007) Dangers of sensationalising conservation biology. Conservation Biology 21: 570571.
Brewer, C.A. (2003) Training ecologists to think with uncertainty in mind. Ecology 84: 14121414.
Brewer, C. & Gross, L.J. (2006) Translating data into meaning: education in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 20 (3): 689691.
Burkhardt-Holm, P. & Chebbi, C. (2008) Master's degree in sustainable development in Switzerland, the first master course comprising three faculties. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 15: 136142.
Buscher, B. & Wolmer, W. (2007) Introduction: the politics of engagement between biodiversity conservation and the social sciences. Conservation and Society 5 (1): 121.
Campbell, L. (2005) Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conservation Biology 19: 574577.
Cannon, J.R., Dietz, J.M. & Dietz, L.A. (1996) Training conservation biologists in human interaction skills. Conservation Biology 10: 12771282.
Clark, T. (2001) Developing policy-oriented curricula for conservation biology: professional and leadership education in the public interest. Conservation Biology 15: 3139.
Czech, B. (2006) If Rome is burning, why are we fiddling? Conservation Biology 20: 15631565.
De Groot, W. & de Wit, A. (1999) Curriculum development in environmental science: a case study on paradigm and institutions. Environmental Management 23 (2): 155163.
Dillon, P. (2008) A pedagogy of connection and boundary crossings: methodological and epistemological transactions in working across and between disciplines. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45: 255262.
Eriksson, L. (1999) Graduate conservation education. Conservation Biology 13: 955.
Fisher, B., Balmford, B., Green, R.E. & Trevelyan, R. (2009) Conservation science training: the need for an extra dimension. Oryx 43 (3): 361363.
Fox, H., Christian, C., Cully-Nordby, J., Pergams, P., Peterson, G. & Pyke, C. (2006) Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conservation Biology 20: 18171820.
Galindo-Leal, C. (2001) Design and analysis of conservation projects in Latin America: an integrative approach to training. Conservation Ecology 5: 16 [www document]. URL http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art16/
Gass, C. (2002) Introduction to the special feature: education for integration and sustainability. Conservation Ecology 5: 31 [www document]. URL http://www/consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art31/
Gigliotti, L.M. & Decker, D.J. (1992) Human dimensions in wildlife management education: pre-service opportunities and in-service needs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20: 814.
Harrison, S., Massey, D. & Richards, K. (2008) Conversations across the divide. Geoforum 39: 549551.
Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J.T., Bruun, H. & Hukkinen, J. (2010) Analyzing interdisciplinarity: typology and indicators. Research Policy 39: 7988.
Jacobson, S. & McDuff, M. (1998) Training idiot savants: the lack of human dimensions in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 12: 263267.
Jacobson, S.K. & Robinson, J.G. (1990) Training the new conservationist: cross-disciplinary education in the 1990s. Environmental Conservation 17: 319327.
Kainer, K., Schmink, M., Covert, H., Stepp, J., Bruna, E., Dain, J., Espinosa, S. & Humphries, S. (2006) A graduate education framework for tropical conservation and development. Conservation Biology 20: 313.
Klein, J.T. (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Detroit, USA: Wayne State University Press.
Knight, A.T., Cowling, R.M., Rouget, M., Balmford, A., Lombard, A.T. & Campbell, B.M. (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conservation Biology 22: 610617.
Kroll, A. (2007) Integrating professional skills in wildlife student education. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 226230.
Lau, L. & Pasquini, M. (2008) ‘Jack of all trades’? The negotiation of interdisciplinarity within geography. Geoforum 39: 552560.
Lidicker, W.Z. (1998) Revisiting the human dimension in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 12 (6): 11701171.
Lopez, R., Hays, K., Wagner, M., Locke, S., McLeery, R. & Silvy, N. (2006) Integrating land conservation planning in the classroom. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 223228.
Martinich, J., Solarz, S. & Lyons, J. (2006) Preparing students for conservation careers through project-based learning. Conservation Biology 20: 15791583.
Marzano, M., Carss, D.N. & Bell, S. (2006) Working to make interdisciplinarity work: investing in communication and interpersonal relationships. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (2): 185197.
Mascia, M., Brosius, J., Dobson, T., Forbes, B., Horowitz, L., McKean, M. & Turner, N. (2003) Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17: 649650.
McWilliam, E., Hearn, G. & Haseman, B. (2008) Transdisciplinarity for creative future: what barriers and opportunities? Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45: 247253.
Meffe, G. (1998) Softening the boundaries. Conservation Biology 12: 259260.
Meffe, G.K., Noss, R.F. & Jacobsen, S.K. (1998) Letters. Conservation Biology 12 (6): 11701171.
Meine, C., Soule, M. & Noss, R. (2006) A ‘mission-driven discipline’: the growth of conservation biology Conservation Biology 20: 631651.
Mendez, M., Gomez, A., Bynum, N., Medellin, R., Porzecanski, A. L. & Sterling, E. (2007) Availability of formal academic programs in conservation biology in Latin America. Conservation Biology 21 (6): 13991403.
Millspaugh, J. & Millenbah, K. (2004) Value and structure of research experiences for undergraduate wildlife students. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 11851194.
Morse, W.C., Nielsen-Pincus, M., Force, J. & Wulfhorst, J. (2007) Bridges and barriers to developing and conducting interdisciplinary graduate-student team research. Ecology and Society 12 (2): 8 [www document]. URL: http://www.ecologyand-society.org/vol12/iss2/art8/
Muir, M.J. & Schwartz, M.W. (2009) Academic research training for a non-academic workplace: a case study of graduate student alumni who work in conservation. Conservation Biology 23: 13571368.
Newing, H. (2010) Bridging the gap: interdisciplinarity, biocultural diversity and conservation. In: Nature and Culture: Revitalising the Connection, ed. Pretty, J. & Pilgrim, S., pp. 2340. London, UK: Earthscan.
Newing, H. (2011) Conducting Research in Conservation: A Social Science Perspective. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Niesenbaum, R. & Lewis, T. (2003) Ghettoization in conservation biology: how interdisciplinary is our teaching? Conservation Biology 17: 610.
Noss, R. (1997) The failure of universities to produce conservation biologists. Conservation Biology 11: 12671269.
Noss, R. (1999) Is there a special conservation biology? Ecography 22: 113122.
Orr, D. (1999) Education, careers, and callings: the practice of conservation biology. Conservation Biology 13 (6): 12421245.
Perez, H. (2005) What students can do to improve graduate education in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 19: 20332035.
Polunin, N & Willis, T. (2007) Comments in Environmental Conservation: developing crucial dialogue in environmental science. Environmental Conservation 34 (2): 89.
Redford, K. & Sanjayan, M. (2003) Retiring Cassandra. Conservation Biology 17: 14731474.
Rivas, J.A. (1998) The miracle of universities. Conservation Biology 12 (6): 11691170.
Rodriguez, J.P., Rodriguez-Clark, K.M., Oliveira-Miranda, M.A., Good, T. & Grajal, A. (2006) Professional capacity building: the missing agenda in conservation priority setting. Conservation Biology 20 (5): 13401340.
Rodriguez, J.P., Simonetti, J.A., Premoli, A. & Marini, A. (2005) Conservation in Austral and Neotropical America: building scientific capacity equal to the challenges. Conservation Biology 19 (3): 969972.
Rosa, E. & Machlis, G. (2002) It's a bad thing to make one thing into two: disciplinary distinctions as trained incapacities. Society and Natural Resources 15: 251261.
Scholte, P. (2003) Curriculum development at the African Regional Wildlife Colleges, with special reference to the Ecole de Faune, Cameroon. Environmental Conservation 30: 4958.
Scholte, P., De Groot, W.T. & Mayna, Z. (2006) Protected area managers’ perceptions of community conservation training in West and Central Africa. Environmental Conservation 32 (4): 349355.
Siebert, S. (2000) Creating academically and practically training graduate students. Conservation Biology 14: 595596.
Strang, V. (2009) Integrating the social and natural sciences in environmental research: a discussion paper. Environment Development and Sustainability 11: 118.
Szostak, R. (2007) How and why to teach interdisciplinary research practice. Journal of Research Practice 3 (2): M17.
Takacs, D., Shapiro, D. & Head, W. (2006) From is to should: helping students translate conservation biology into conservation policy. Conservation Biology 20: 13421348.
Touval, J. & Dietz, J. (1994) The problem of teaching conservation problem solving. Conservation Biology 8: 902904.
Van Heezik, Y. & Seddon, P. (2005) Structure and content of graduate wildlife management and conservation biology programs: an international perspective. Conservation Biology 19: 714.
Wemmer, C. (1993) Training developing country nationals is the critical ingredient to conservation global biodiversity. Bioscience 43 (11): 762767.
White, R., Fleischner, T. & Trombulak, S. (2000) The status of undergraduate education in conservation biology, Society for Conservation Biology [www document]. URL http://www.conbio.org/Resources/education/StatusUndergradEducation.pdf
Youngblood, D. (2007) Interdisciplinary studies and bridging disciplines: a matter of process. Journal of Research Practice 3: M18.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed