Skip to main content Accessibility help

Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis



Disturbances to key aspects of ecological systems, including biodiversity loss, climate change, pollution and natural resource degradation, have become a major concern to many policy analysts. Instead of learning from the study of biological complexity however, social scientists tend to recommend simple panaceas, particularly government or private ownership, as ‘the’ way to solve these problems. This paper reviews and assesses potential solutions for such overly simplified institutional prescriptions, referred to here as the ‘panacea problem’. In contrast to these simple prescriptions, recent research efforts are now illustrating the diversity of institutions around the world related to environmental conservation. The complexity of working institutions, however, presents a challenge to scholars who equate scientific knowledge with relatively simple models that predict optimal performance if specific institutional arrangements are in place. Dealing with this complexity has led to the development of frameworks as meta-theoretical tools. The institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework has been used over the last three decades as a foundation for a focused analysis of how institutions affect human incentives, actions and outcomes. Building on this foundation, the social-ecological systems (SES) framework has recently enabled researchers to begin the development of a common language that crosses social and ecological disciplines to analyse how interactions among a variety of factors affect outcomes. Such a framework may be able to facilitate a diagnostic approach that will help future analysts overcome the panacea problem. Using a common framework to diagnose the source, and possible amelioration, of poor outcomes for ecological and human systems enables a much finer understanding of these complex systems than has so far been obtained, and provides a basis for comparisons among many systems and ultimately more responsible policy prescriptions.


Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Dr Elinor Ostrom Tel: +1 812 855 0441 Fax: +1 812 855 3150 assistant's e-mail:


Hide All
Agrawal, A. (2003) Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 234262.
Agrawal, A. (2005) Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press.
Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A. & Hardin, R. (2008) Changing governance of the world's forests. Science 320: 14601462.
Alchian, A. & Demsetz, H. (1973) The property right paradigm. Journal of Economic History 33 (1): 1627.
Anderies, J.M., Janssen, M. & Ostrom, E. (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society 9 (1): 18.
Andersson, K., Gibson, C. & Lehoucq, F. (2006) Municipal politics and forest governance: comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development 34 (3): 576595.
Armitage, D., Berkes, F. & Doubleday, N., eds (2007) Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
Banana, A.Y. & Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W. (2000) Successful forest management: the importance of security of tenure and rule enforcement in Ugandan forests. In: People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance, ed. Gibson, C.C., McKean, M.A. & Ostrom, E., pp. 8798. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Banana, A.Y., Vogt, N., Bahati, J. & Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W. (2007) Decentralized governance and ecological health: why local institutions fail to moderate deforestation in Mpigi District of Uganda. Scientific Research and Essays 2 (10): 434445.
Barrett, C.B., Brandon, K., Gibson, C. & Gjertsen, H. (2001) Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions. Bioscience 51: 497502.
Batistella, M., Robeson, S. & Moran, E.F. (2003) Settlement design, forest fragmentation, and landscape change in Rondônia, Amazônia. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69 (7): 805812.
Berkes, F. (2002) Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspectives from the bottom up. In: The Drama of the Commons, ed. Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P.C., Stonich, S. & Weber, E.U., pp. 293322. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
Berkes, F. (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 1518815193.
Berkes, F. & Folke, C. (1998) Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Berkes, F. & Turner, N.J. (2006) Knowledge, learning and the evolution of conservation practice for social-ecological system resilience. Human Ecology 34 (4): 479494.
Blaikie, P. (2006) Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34 (11): 19421957.
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M., Farvar, M.T., Kothari, A. & Renard, Y. (2007) Sharing Power: Learning-By-Doing in Co-Management of Natural Resources. London, UK: Earthscan.
Brander, J.A. & Scott Taylor, M. (1998) Open access renewable resources: trade and trade policy in a two-country model. Journal of International Economics 44: 181209.
Bray, D.B. (2010) Capitalism meets common-property. Americas Quarterly Winter: 30–35.
Brock, W.A. & Carpenter, S.R. (2007) Panaceas and diversification of environmental policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 1520615211.
Bromley, D., Feeny, D., McKean, M., Peters, P., Gilles, J., Oakerson, R., Runge, C.F. & Thomson, J., eds. (1992) Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy. San Francisco, CA, USA: ICS Press.
Brunckhorst, D.J. (2010) Using context in novel community-based natural resource management: landscapes of property, policy and place. Environmental Conservation 37 (1): 1622.
Brunckhorst, D., Coop, P. & Reeve, I. (2006) ‘Eco-civic’ optimisation: a nested framework for planning and managing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 72 (5): 117134.
Brunckhorst, D., Reeve, I., Morley, P. & Bock, K. (2008) Strategic spatial governance: deriving social–ecological frameworks for managing landscapes and regions. In: Landscape Analysis and Visualisation: Spatial Models for Natural Resource Management and Planning, ed. Pettit, C., Cartwright, W., Bishop, I., Lowell, K., Pullar, D. & Duncan, D., pp. 253276. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Brunson, M.W. & Huntsinger, L. (2008) Ranching as a conservation strategy: can old ranchers save the new west? Rangeland Ecology and Management 61 (2): 137147.
Campbell, B.M., Gordon, I.J., Luckert, M.K., Petheram, L. & Vetter, S. (2006) In search of optimal stocking regimes in semi-arid grazing lands: one size does not fit all. Ecological Economics 60 (1): 7585.
Canadell, J.G. & Raupach, M.R. (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320: 14561457.
Carlsson, L. & Berkes, F. (2005) Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 6576.
Cash, D.W, Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jager, J. & Mitchell, R.B. (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (14): 80868091.
Chapin, F.S., Matson, P.A. & Mooney, H.A. (2002) Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Chhatre, A. & Agrawal, A. (2008) Forest commons and local enforcement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (36): 1328613291.
Cleaver, F. (1999) Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development 11: 597612.
Cleaver, F. (2000) Moral ecological rationality, institutions and the management of common property resources. Development and Change 31 (2): 361383.
Coleman, E. (2009) Institutional factors affecting ecological outcomes in forest management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28 (1): 122146.
Coleman, E. & Steed, B. (2009) Monitoring and sanctioning in the commons: an application to forestry. Ecological Economics 68 (7): 21062113.
Cooper, J., Bernstein, J. & Claasen, R. (2005) Overview of agri-environmental programmes in the European Union and the United States. Farm Policy Journal 2:3141.
Cox, M. (2008) Balancing accuracy and meaning in common-pool resource theory. Ecology and Society 13 (2): 44.
Cox, M. (2010) Exploring the dynamics of social-ecological systems: the case of the Taos valley acequias. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, Indiana, USA.
Cox, M., Arnold, B. & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society (in press).
Dallmeier, F. & Comiskey, J.A. (1998) Forest Biodiversity in North, Central and South America, and the Caribbean: Research and Monitoring. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Dasgupta, P. & Heal, G.M. (1979) Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Degnbol, P., Gislason, H., Hanna, S., Jentoft, S., Raakjær, J., Nielsen, Sverdrup-Jensen S. & Clyde Wilson, D. (2006) Painting the floor with a hammer: technical fixes in fisheries management. Marine Policy 30: 534543.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P.C. (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302 (5652): 19071912.
Dressler, W., Büscher, B., Schoon, M., Brockington, D., Hayes, T., Kull, C.A., McCarthy, J. & Shrestha, K. (2010) From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environmental Conservation 37 (1): 515.
Evans, P. (2004) Development as institutional change: the pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (4): 3052.
Fairfax, S.K., Gwin, L., King, M.A., Raymond, L. & Watt, L.A. (2005) The Limits of Land Acquisition as a Conservation Strategy, 1780–2004. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
FAO (2010) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B.J. & Acheson, J.M. (1990) The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Human Ecology 18 (1): 119.
George, A.L. & Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Ghate, R. & Nagendra, H. (2005) Role of monitoring in institutional performance: forest management in Maharashtra, India. Conservation and Society 3 (2): 509532.
Gibson, C.C., McKean, M.A. & Ostrom, E., eds. (2000) People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Gibson, C.C., Williams, J.T. & Ostrom, E. (2005) Local enforcement and better forests. World Development 33 (2): 273284.
Hackel, J.D. (1999) Community conservation and the future of Africa's wildlife. Conservation Biology 13 (4): 726734.
Hanna, S. & Munasinghe, M. (1995) Property Rights in a Social and Ecological Context; Case Studies and Design Principles. Washington, DC, USA: The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and The World Bank.
Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 (3859): 12431248.
Hayek, F. (1945) The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35 (4): 519530.
Hayes, T. (2006) Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development 34 (12): 20642075.
Hill, R., Williams, K J., Pert, P.L., Robinson, C.J., Dale, A.P., Westcott, D.A., Grace, R.A. & O'Malley, T. (2010) Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia's tropical rainforests. Environmental Conservation 37 (1): 7382.
Johnson, K., Swanson, F., Herring, M. & Greene, S. (1999) Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Korten, D.C. (1980) Community organization and rural development: a learning process approach. Public Administration Review 40 (5): 480511.
Lam, W.-F. (1998) Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure, and Collective Action. San Francisco, CA, USA: ICS Press.
Levin, S.A. (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 19431967.
Levin, S.A. (1999) Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons. Cambridge, MA, USA: Perseus Books.
Lovejoy, T.E. (2006) Protected areas: a prism for a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 329333.
Lubell, M. (2005) Public learning and grassroots cooperation. In: Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning, ed. Scholz, J.T. & Stiftel, B., pp. 174184. Washington, DC, USA: Resources for the Future Press.
Marshall, G. (2005) Economics for Collaborative Environmental Management: Renegotiating the Commons. London, UK: Earthscan.
McGinnis, M. (1999) Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.
McGinnis, M. (2010) Building a programme for institutional analysis of social-ecological systems: a review of revisions to the SES framework. Working Paper. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Meinzen-Dick, R. (2007) Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 1520015206.
Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P.O. & Kislalioglu, M. (2004) Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for co-management. Ecology and Society 9 (3): 2.
Murphree, M.W. (2002) Protected areas and the commons. Common Property Resource Digest 60: 13.
Netting, R.M. (1972) Of men and meadows: strategies of alpine land use. Anthropological Quarterly 45: 132144.
NRC (1986) Proceedings of the Conference on Common Property Resource Management. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
NRC (2002) The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
Ostrom, E. (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48 (1): 325.
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2007 a). Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edition, ed. Sabatier, P.A., pp. 2164. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press.
Ostrom, E. (2007 b) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 1518115187.
Ostrom, E. (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325: 419422.
Ostrom, E. & Nagendra, H. (2006) Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (51): 1922419231.
Ostrom, E. & Parks, R.B. (1999) Neither gargantua nor the land of lilliputs: conjectures on mixed systems of metropolitan organization. In: Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, ed. McGinnis, M., pp. 284305. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. & Walker, J. (1994) Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. & Anderies, M.A. (2007) Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 1517615178.
Ostrom, E., Parks, R.B. & Whitaker, G.P. (1978) Patterns of Metropolitan Policing. Cambridge, MA, USA: Ballinger.
Ostrom, V. (1999 a) Polycentricity (Part 1). In: Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, ed. McGinnis, M., pp. 5274. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, V. (1999 b) Polycentricity (Part 2). In: Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, ed. McGinnis, M., pp. 119138. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.
Pagdee, A., Kim, Y. & Daugherty, P.J. (2006) What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 19 (1): 3352.
Poteete, A.R. & Ostrom, E. (2004) Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: the role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change 35 (3): 437461.
Poteete, A.R., Janssen, M. & Ostrom, E. (2010) Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Ragin, C.C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Ragin, C.C. (2000) Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C.C. (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Rose, C. (2002) Common property, regulatory property, and environmental protection: comparing community-based management to tradable environmental allowances. In: The Drama of the Commons, ed. Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P.C., Stonich, S. & Weber, E., pp. 233258. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press.
Rudel, T.K. (2008) Meta-analysis of case studies: a method for studying regional and global climate change. Global Environmental Change 18 (1): 1825.
Sandström, C. (2009) Institutional dimensions of comanagement: Participation, power and process. Society and Natural Resources 22: 230244
Satria, A., Matsuda, Y. & Sano, M. (2006) Questioning community based coral reef management systems: case study of Awig-Awig in Gili Indah, Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability 8: 99118.
Schlager, E. (1990) Model specification and policy analysis: the governance of coastal fisheries. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, USA.
Schlager, E. (2007) A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. In: Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edition, ed. Sabatier, P.A., pp. 293320. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press.
Schlager, E. & Ostrom, E. (1992) Property-regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68 (3): 249262.
Scholz, J.T. & Wang, C-L. (2006) Cooptation or transformation? Local policy networks and federal regulatory enforcement. American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 8197.
Schoon, M. & Cox, M. (2010) Understanding disturbances and responses in social-ecological systems. Society and Natural Resources. In press.
Scott, J. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.
Shackleton, C. & Shackleton, S. (2004) The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100: 658664.
Shanmugaratnam, N. (1996) Nationalisation, privatisation, and the dilemmas of common property management in western Rajasthan. Journal of Development Studies 33: 163187.
Shivakoti, G.P. & Ostrom, E., eds. (2002) Improving Irrigation Governance and Management in Nepal. San Francisco, CA, USA: ICS Press.
St Martin, K., McCay, B.J., Murray, G., Johnson, T. & Oles, B. (2007) Communities, knowledge and fisheries of the future. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 7 (2/3): 221239.
Stavins, R.N. (2008) Addressing climate change with a comprehensive U.S. cap-and-trade system. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24 (2): 298321.
Steins, N.A. & Edwards, V.M. (1999) Collective action on common pool resource management: the contribution of a social constructivist perspective to existing theory. Society and Natural Resources 12: 539557.
Tang, S.Y. (1992) Institutions and Collective Action: Self-Governance in Irrigation. San Francisco, CA, USA: ICS Press.
Terborgh, J. (1999) Requiem for Nature. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Trawick, P.B. (2001) Successfully governing the commons: principles of social organization in an Andean irrigation system. Human Ecology 29 (1): 125.
Tucker, C.M. (2008) Changing Forests: Collective Action, Common Property, and Coffee in Honduras. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Walker, B. & Salt, D. (2006) Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Webb, E. & Shivakoti, G.P., eds. (2008) Decentralization, Forests and Rural Communities: Policy Outcomes in South and Southeast Asia. New Delhi, India: Sage India.
Weimer, D.L. & Vining, A.R. (2005) Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
Western, D. & Wright, R.M. (1994) The background to community-based conservation. In: Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation, ed. Western, D. & Wright, R.M., pp. 114. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Wollenberg, E., Merino, L., Agrawal, A. & Ostrom, E. (2007) Fourteen years of monitoring community-managed forests: learning from IFRI's experience. International Forestry Review 9 (2): 670684.
Young, O. (2002) The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.