Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis

  • ELINOR OSTROM (a1) and MICHAEL COX (a1)
Abstract
SUMMARY

Disturbances to key aspects of ecological systems, including biodiversity loss, climate change, pollution and natural resource degradation, have become a major concern to many policy analysts. Instead of learning from the study of biological complexity however, social scientists tend to recommend simple panaceas, particularly government or private ownership, as ‘the’ way to solve these problems. This paper reviews and assesses potential solutions for such overly simplified institutional prescriptions, referred to here as the ‘panacea problem’. In contrast to these simple prescriptions, recent research efforts are now illustrating the diversity of institutions around the world related to environmental conservation. The complexity of working institutions, however, presents a challenge to scholars who equate scientific knowledge with relatively simple models that predict optimal performance if specific institutional arrangements are in place. Dealing with this complexity has led to the development of frameworks as meta-theoretical tools. The institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework has been used over the last three decades as a foundation for a focused analysis of how institutions affect human incentives, actions and outcomes. Building on this foundation, the social-ecological systems (SES) framework has recently enabled researchers to begin the development of a common language that crosses social and ecological disciplines to analyse how interactions among a variety of factors affect outcomes. Such a framework may be able to facilitate a diagnostic approach that will help future analysts overcome the panacea problem. Using a common framework to diagnose the source, and possible amelioration, of poor outcomes for ecological and human systems enables a much finer understanding of these complex systems than has so far been obtained, and provides a basis for comparisons among many systems and ultimately more responsible policy prescriptions.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Elinor Ostrom Tel: +1 812 855 0441 Fax: +1 812 855 3150 assistant's e-mail: stodd@indiana.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Brunckhorst , I. Reeve , P. Morley & K. Bock (2008) Strategic spatial governance: deriving social–ecological frameworks for managing landscapes and regions. In: Landscape Analysis and Visualisation: Spatial Models for Natural Resource Management and Planning, ed. C. Pettit , W. Cartwright , I. Bishop , K. Lowell , D. Pullar & D. Duncan , pp. 253276. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

S. Hanna & M. Munasinghe (1995) Property Rights in a Social and Ecological Context; Case Studies and Design Principles. Washington, DC, USA: The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and The World Bank.

M. McGinnis (1999) Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.

E. Ostrom (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

E. Ostrom , R. Gardner & J. Walker (1994) Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.

A.R. Poteete , M. Janssen & E. Ostrom (2010) Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.

C.C. Ragin (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.

C.M. Tucker (2008) Changing Forests: Collective Action, Common Property, and Coffee in Honduras. New York, NY, USA: Springer.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 176 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 690 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.