The authors wish to correct an error in the introduction section of this article. In the published version it is stated:
If ERA5 precipitation is assumed to be close to reality, this application can be considered a proof-of-concept for heterogeneous model output statistics downscaling and bias-correction (Maraun and Widmann, 2017).
This should have read as follows:
If ERA5 precipitation is assumed to be close to reality, this application can be considered a proof-of-concept for inhomogeneous perfect prognosis downscaling and bias-correction (Maraun and Widmann, 2017).
The authors apologise for this error.