Skip to main content
×
×
Home

COHERENCE AND CORRESPONDENCE IN THE NETWORK DYNAMICS OF BELIEF SUITES

  • Patrick Grim, Andrew Modell, Nicholas Breslin, Jasmine Mcnenny, Irina Mondescu, Kyle Finnegan, Robert Olsen, Chanyu An and Alexander Fedder...
Abstract

Coherence and correspondence are classical contenders as theories of truth. In this paper we examine them instead as interacting factors in the dynamics of belief across epistemic networks. We construct an agent-based model of network contact in which agents are characterized not in terms of single beliefs but in terms of internal belief suites. Individuals update elements of their belief suites on input from other agents in order both to maximize internal belief coherence and to incorporate ‘trickled in’ elements of truth as correspondence. Results, though often intuitive, prove more complex than in simpler models (Hegselmann and Krause 2002, 2006; Grim et al. 2015). The optimistic finding is that pressures toward internal coherence can exploit and expand on small elements of truth as correspondence is introduced into epistemic networks. Less optimistic results show that pressures for coherence can also work directly against the incorporation of truth, particularly when coherence is established first and new data are introduced later.

Copyright
Corresponding author
patrick.grim@stonybrook.edu
References
Hide All
Alchourrón, C. E., Gärdenfors, P. and Makinson, D. 1985. ‘On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions.’ Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50: 510–30.
Axelrod, R. 1997. ‘The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41: 203–26.
Bednar, J., Bramson, A., Jones-Rooy, A. and Page, S. 2010. ‘Emergent Cultural Signatures and Persistent Diversity: A Model of Conformity and Consistency.’ Rationality and Society, 22: 407–44.
Blanshard, B. 1964. Reason and Analysis. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Boas, T. C. 2007. ‘Conceptualizing Continuity and Change: The Composite-Standard Model of Path Dependence.’ Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19: 3354.
BonJour, L. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burger, J. M. and Cornelius, T. 2003. ‘Raising the Price of Agreement: Public Commitment and the Lowball Compliance Procedure.’ Journal for Applied Social Psychology, 33: 923–34.
Chen, M. K. and Risen, J. L. 2010. ‘How Choice Affects and Reflects Preferences: Revisiting the Free-choice Paradigm.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99: 573–94.
Cialdini, R. B. and Goldstein, N. J. 2004. ‘Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity.’ Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 591621.
Cooper, J. M. 2007. Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory. London: Sage.
Davidson, D. 1986. ‘A Coherence Theory of Knowledge and Truth.’ In Lepore, E. (ed.), Truth and Interpretation, pp. 307–19. Oxford: Blackwell.
DeMarzon, P. M., Zwiebel, J. and Vayanos, D. 2003. ‘Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Unidimensional Opinions.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 909–68.
Ewing, A. C. 1934. Idealism: A Critical Survey. London: Methuen.
Fagin, R., Ullman, J. D. and Vardi, M. Y. 1983. ‘On the Semantics of Updates in Databases.’ In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. Atlanta, GA: ACM.
Feldman, R. and Warfield, T. A. (eds) 2010. Disagreement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Garbayo, L. 2014. ‘Epistemic Considerations on Expert Disagreement, Normative Justification, and Inconsistency Regarding Multi-criteria Decision Making.’ In Ceberio, M. and Kreinovich, V. (eds), Constraint Programming and Decision Making, pp. 3545. New York, NY: Springer.
Gärdenfors, P. 1988. Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gawronski, B. and Strack, F. (eds) 2012. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., Bramson, A., Berger, W. J., Reade, C., Flocken, C. and Sales, A. 2013. ‘Scientific Networks on Data Landscapes: Question Difficulty, Epistemic Success, and Convergence.’ Episteme, 10: 441–64.
Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., Bramson, A., Berger, W. J., Reade, C. and Fisher, S. 2015. ‘Germs, Genes, & Memes: Functional and Fitness Dynamics on Information Networks.’ Philosophy of Science, 82: 219–43.
Guégen, N., Pascal, A. and Diagot, L. 2002. ‘Low-Ball and Compliance to a Request: An Application in a Field Setting.’ Psychological Reports, 91: 81–4.
Haig, B. D. and Borsboom, D. 2012. ‘Truth, Science, and Psychology.’ Theory and Psychology, 22: 272–89.
Harman, G. 1986. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hegselmann, R. and Krause, U. 2002. ‘Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models.’ Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html
Hegselmann, R. and Krause, U. 2006. ‘Truth and Cognitive Division of Labour: First Steps towards a Computer Aided Social Epistemology.’ Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/3/10.html
Hegselmann, R. and Krause, U. 2009. ‘Deliberative Exchange, Truth, and Cognitive Division of Labour: A Low-Resolution Modeling Approach.’ Episteme, 6: 13144.
Hempel, C. 1935. ‘On the Logical Positivists’ Theory of Truth.’ Analysis, 2: 4959.
Huberman, B. A. and Glance, N. S. 1993. ‘Evolutionary Games and Computer Simulations.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 90: 7716–18.
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D. and Mandel, G. 2012. ‘The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.’ Nature Climate Change, 2: 732–5.
Kam, C. D. 2012. ‘The Psychological Veracity of Zaller's Model.’ Critical Review, 24: 547–67.
Kraft, P. W., Lodge, M. and Taber, C. S. 2015. ‘Why People ‘Don't Trust the Evidence’: Motivated Reasoning and Scientific Beliefs.’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658: 121–33.
Kuhn, D. and Lao, J. 1996. ‘Effects of Evidence on Attitudes: Is Polarization the Norm?Psychological Science, 7: 115–20.
Lehrer, K. 2000. Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edition. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Lewis, C. I. 1929. Mind and the World Order. New York: Charles Scribner [Reprinted New York: Dover 1956].
Lewis, C. I. 1946. An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
Lodge, M. and Taber, C. S. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lord, C. G., Ross, L. and Lepper, M. 1979. ‘Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 2098–109.
Lycan, W. G. 2012. ‘Explanationist Rebuttals (Coherentism Defended Again).’ Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50: 520.
McGinn, C. 2002. ‘The Truth about Truth.’ In Schantz, R. (ed.), What is Truth?, pp. 194204. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
McRae, R. R. 1996. ‘Social Consequences of Experiential Openness.’ Psychological Bulletin, 129: 323–37.
Miller, A. G., McHoskey, J. W., Bane, C. M. and Dowd, T. G. 1993. ‘The Attitude Polarization Phenomenon: Role of Response Measure, Attitude, Extremity, and Behavioral Consequences of Reported Attitude Change.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64: 561–74.
Neurath, O. 1983. Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Cohen, R. S. and Neurath, M. (eds). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Olsson, E. J. 2011. ‘A Simulation Approach to Veritistic Social Epistemology.’ Episteme, 8: 127–43.
Onraet, E., Van Heil, A., Roets, A. and Cornelis, I. 2011. ‘The Closed Mind: ‘Experience’ and ‘Cognition’ Aspects of Openness to Experience and Need for Closure as Psychological Bases for Right-wing Attitudes.’ European Journal of Personality, 25: 184–97.
Page, S. E. 2006. ‘Essay: Path Dependence.’ Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1: 87115.
Price, H. H. 1950. Perception. London: Methuen.
Rescher, N. 1973 [1982]. The Coherence Theory of Truth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 1973; University Press of America 1982.
Riegler, A. and Douven, I. 2009. ‘Extending the Hegselmann-Krause Model III: From Single Beliefs to Complex Belief States.’ Episteme, 6: 145–63.
Rodrigues, O., Gabbay, D. and Russo, A. 2011. ‘Belief Revision.’ In Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edition, vol. 16, pp. 1114. Dordrecht: Springer.
Russel, D. and Jones, W. H. 1980. ‘When Superstition Fails: Reactions to Disconfirmation of Paranormal Beliefs.’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6: 83–8.
Russell, B. 1910. ‘On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood.’ In Philosophical Essays. London: Routledge.
Russell, B. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. New York: Oxford
Schwartzstein, J. 2014. ‘Selective Attention and Learning.’ Journal of the European Economic Association, 12: 1423–52.
Taber, C. S. and Lodge, M. 2006. ‘Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.’ American Journal of Political Science, 50: 755–69.
Thagard, P. 2000. Coherence in Thought and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, P. 2007. ‘Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge.’ Philosophy of Science, 74: 2847.
Thagard, P. and Kunda, Z. 1998. ‘Making Sense of People: Coherence Mechanisms.’ In Read, S. J. and Miller, L. C. (eds), Connectionist Models of Social Reasoning and Social Behavior, pp. 326. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Vallinder, A. and Olsson, E. J. 2014. ‘Trust and the Value of Overconfidence: A Bayesian Perspective on Social Network Communication.’ Synthese, 191: 19912007.
Walsh, C. R. and Sloman, S. A. 2004. ‘Revising Causal Beliefs.’ In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1423–7. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Young, J. O. 2013. ‘The Coherence Theory of Truth.’ In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-coherence/
Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, pp. 4052. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed