Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T01:59:34.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A DILEMMA FOR THE KNOWLEDGE DESPITE FALSEHOOD STRATEGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Christopher Buford  and
Christopher Michael Cloos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One strategy for dealing with apparent cases of knowledge from falsehood is to deny that the knowledge actually is from a falsehood. Those endorsing such a move have suggested that cases of knowledge from falsehood are instead cases of knowledge despite falsehood. We here provide a dilemma for those wanting to reject the possibility of knowledge from falsehood. The dilemma is explained in part by examining recent attempts to deny that knowledge can be inferentially derived from falsehood.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 166 - 182
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Audi, R. 1994. ‘Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions to Believe.’ Noûs, 28: 419–34.Google Scholar
Ball, B. and Bloome-Tillman, M. 2014. ‘Counter Closure and Knowledge Despite Falsehood.’ The Philosophical Quarterly, 64: 552–68.Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. 2014. ‘What is Inference?’ Philosophical Studies, 169: 1–18.Google Scholar
Coffman, E. J. 2008. ‘Warrant Without Truth?’ Synthese, 162: 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitelson, B. 2010. ‘Strengthening the Case for Knowledge from Falsehood.’ Analysis, 70: 666–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hlobil, U. 2014. ‘Against Boghossian, Wright and Broome on Inference.’ Philosophical Studies, 167: 419–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzzi, F. 2010. ‘Counter-Closure.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 88: 673–83.Google Scholar
Montminy, M. 2014. ‘Knowledge Despite Falsehood.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 44: 463–75.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. 2015. ‘Justified Belief from Unjustified Belief.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1111/papq.12129.Google Scholar
Schnee, I. 2015. ‘There is No Knowledge From Falsehood.’ Episteme, 12: 53–74.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. 2015. Belief. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/Google Scholar
Warfield, T. 2005. ‘Knowledge from Falsehood.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 19: 405–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 2014. ‘Comment on Paul Boghossian, ‘What is Inference’.’ Philosophical Studies, 169: 27–37.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 1994. ‘The Inescapability of Gettier Problems.’ The Philosophical Quarterly, 44: 65–73.Google Scholar