Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Epistemic Cultures of Science and Wikipedia: A Comparison

  • K. Brad Wray
Abstract

I compare the epistemic culture of Wikipedia with the epistemic culture of science, with special attention to the culture of collaborative research in science. The two cultures differ markedly with respect to (1) the knowledge produced, (2) who produces the knowledge, and (3) the processes by which knowledge is produced. Wikipedia has created a community of inquirers that are governed by norms very different from those that govern scientists. Those who contribute to Wikipedia do not ground their claims on their reputations as knowers, for they stand to lose nothing if and when their contributions are found to be misleading or false. And the immediacy of the medium encourages gossip and jokes. Hence, though we have some reason to believe that an invisible hand aids scientists in realizing their epistemic goals, we cannot ground our confidence in what is reported on Wikipedia on the fact that an invisible hand ensures quality. Nor is the information on Wikipedia aptly justified in a manner similar to the way testimony can be justified.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Andersen, D. 2006. “Does Wikipedia Hurt Scholarship?: It Promotes Sloppy, First-hit Student Research.” On Campus 26(2): 4.
Biagioli, M. 2003. “Rights or Rewards? Changing Frameworks of Scientific Authorship.” In Biagioli, M. and Galison, P., (eds.), Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, pp. 253–79. New York: Routledge.
Brown, J. R. 2001. Who Rules in Science?: An Opinionated Guide to the Wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cole, S. 1992. Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Deb, K., Sivaguru, M., Tong, H. Y., and Roberts, R. M.. 2006. “Cdx2 Gene Expression and Trophectoderm Lineage Specification inMouse Embryos.” Science 311(5763): 992–6.
Fallis, D. 2008. “Toward an Epistemology of Wikipedia.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(10): 1662–74.
Feyerabend, P. 1988. Against Method. Revised edition. London: Verso.
Foley, R. 1994. “Egoism in Epistemology.” In Schmitt, F. (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge, pp. 5373. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Fuller, S. 2000. The Governance of Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Giles, J. 2005. “Internet Encyclopaedias go Head to Head.” Nature 438: 900–1.
Hardwig, J. 1985. “Epistemic Dependence.” Journal of Philosophy 82: 335–49.
Hull, D. L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hull, D. L. 2001. Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hume, D. 1748/1977. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Steinberg, E. (ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Kitcher, P. 1997. “An Argument About Free Inquiry.” Nous 31: 279306.
Knorr, Cetina K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. 1996. Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Third edition. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Second edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Merton, R. K. 1942. “The Normative Structure of Science.” InMerton (1973), pp. 267–78.
Merton, R. K. 1957. “Priorities in Scientific Discovery.” In Merton (1973), pp. 286324.
Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Storer, N.W. (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mill, J. S. 1859/1956. On Liberty. Shields, C. V. (ed.). New York: The Liberal Arts Press.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Roberts, R. M., Sivaguru, M., and Yong, H. Y.. 2007. “Retraction.” Science 317(5837): 450.
Ross, S. 2008. “Wikipedia and the History of Science.” Newsletter of the History of Science Society 37(1): 1, 6.
Seelye, K. Q. 2005. “A Little Sleuthing Unmasks Writer of Wikipedia Prank.” New York Times, December 11. Retrieved September 8, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/business/media/11web.html
Seigenthaler, J. 2005. “A False Wikipedia ‘Biography’.” USA Today, November 29. Retrieved January 17, 2008, from http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm
Shapin, S. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, A. 1776/1970. The Wealth of Nations. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.
Thagard, P. 1999. How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P. 2006. “How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44: 177–96.
Tollefsen, D. 2007. “Group Testimony.” Social Epistemology 21(3): 299311.
Wikipedia contributors. “Wikipedia: About.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved October 8, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About
Wray, K. B. 2000. “Invisible Hands and the Success of Science.” Philosophy of Science 67: 163–75.
Wray, K. B. 2001. “Science, Biases, and the Threat of Global Pessimism.” Philosophy of Science 68(Proceedings): S46778.
Wray, K. B. 2002. “The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research.” Philosophy Science 69: 150–68.
Wray, K. B. 2006. “Scientific Authorship in the Age of Collaborative Research.” Studies History and Philosophy of Science 37(3): 505–14.
Wray, K. B. 2007. “Who has Scientific Knowledge?Social Epistemology 21(3): 337–47.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed