Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Epistemic Value Theory and Judgment Aggregation

Abstract

We frequently make judgments about the world. Juries make judgments about whether defendants are guilty. Umpires make judgments about whether pitches are strikes. Tenure committees make judgments about whether professors deserve tenure. We typically want these judgments about the world to have good epistemic properties. We would like our judgments to be true rather than false, for example. We would also like our judgments to be consistent with each other; and we would like to have good reasons for our judgments. This paper will be concerned with how we can make judgments that have such good epistemic properties.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alston William P. (1985). Concepts of epistemic justification. Monist 68:5789.
Azzouni Jody (2003). The strengthened liar, the expressive strength of natural languages, and regimentation. Philosophical Forum 34:329–50.
BonJour Laurence (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge MA: Harvard.
Bovens Luc & Rabinowicz Wlodek (2004). Voting procedures for complex collective decisions: An epistemic perspective Ratio Juris 17:241–58.
Broome John (2004). Weighing Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown Bryson (1990). How to be realistic about inconsistency in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21:281–94.
Brown Bryson (1999). Adjunction and aggregation. Nous 33:273–83.
Chisholm Roderick (1977). Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Descartes René (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy. ed. Cottingham John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Estlund David M. (1994). Opinion leaders, independence, and Condorcet's jury theorem. Theory and Decision 36:131–62.
Fallis Don (1997). The epistemic status of probabilistic proof. Journal of Philosophy 94:165–86.
Fallis Don (2002). Goldman on probabilistic inference. Philosophical Studies 109:223–40.
Fallis Don (2004). Epistemic value theory and information ethics. Minds and Machines 14:101–17.
Field Hartry (1982). Realism and relativism. Journal of Philosophy 79:553–67.
Foley Richard (1993). Working Without a Net. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilbert Margaret (1994). Remarks on collective belief in Socializing Epistemology, ed. Schmitt Frederick F.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield (pp. 235–56).
Godfrey-Smith Peter (1991). Signal, decision, action. Journal of Philosophy 88:709–22.
Goldman Alvin (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldman Alvin (2001). The unity of the epistemic virtues in Virtue Epistemology, eds. Fairweather Abrol & Zagzebski Linda. New York: Oxford University Press. (pp. 3048).
Griffin James (1986). Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harman Gilbert (1986). Change in View. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Hume David (1977). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. ed. Steinberg Eric. Indianapolis: Hackett.
James William (1979). The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Jeffrey R. (1956). Valuation and acceptance of scientific hypotheses. Philosophy of Science 23:237–46.
Jeffrey R. (1987). Alias Smith and Jones: The testimony of the senses. Erkenntnis 26:391–99.
Kaplan Mark (1996). Decision Theory As Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan Mark (2002). Decision theory and epistemology in The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, ed. Moser Paul K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (pp. 434–62).
Keeney Ralph L. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Kelly Thomas (2003). Epistemic rationality as instrumental rationality: A critique. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66:612–40.
Kitcher Philip (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review 101:53114.
Kitcher Philip (2001). Knowledge and tradition. Philosophical Topics 29:251–70.
Klein Peter (1985). The virtues of inconsistency. Monist 68:105–35.
Klein Peter (forthcoming). Useful falsehoods in Epistemology, ed. Smith Quentin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knight Kevin (2002). Measuring inconsistency. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31:7798.
Kornhauser Lewis A. & Sager Lawrence G. (1993). The one and the many: Adjudication in collegial courts California Law Review 81:159.
Kripke Saul A. (1979). A puzzle about belief in Meaning and Use, ed. Margalit Avishai. Dordrecht: D. Reidel (pp. 239–83).
Kvanvig Jonathan L. (1998). Why should inquiring minds want to know?: Meno problems and epistemological axiology. Monist 81:426–51.
Kyburg Henry E. (1970). Conjunctivitis in Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief, ed. Swain Marshall. Dordrect: D. Reidel (pp. 5582).
Lehrer Keith (1975). Reason and consistency in Analysis and Metaphysics, ed. Lehrer Keith. Dordrecht: Reidel (pp. 5774).
Levi Isaac (1962). On the seriousness of mistakes. Philosophy of Science 29:4765.
Levi Isaac (2004). List and Pettit. Synthese 140:237–42.
List Christian (forthcoming). The discursive dilemma and public reason. Ethics.
List Christian & Pettit Philip (2005). On the many as one: A reply to Kornhauser and Sager. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 377–90.
Maher Patrick (1993). Betting on Theories. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Makinson D. C. (1965). The paradox of the preface. Analysis 25:205–7.
Nozick Robert (1993). The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Paterson R. W. K. (1979). Towards an axiology of knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Education 13:91100.
Pettit Philip (2001). Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma. Philosophical Issues 11:268–99.
Pettit Philip (2003). Groups with minds of their own in Socializing Metaphysics, ed. Schmitt Frederick F.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield (pp. 167–93).
Pollock John L. (1994). Justification and defeat. Artificial Intelligence 67:377407.
Priest Graham (1998). What is so bad about contradictions? Journal of Philosophy 95:410426.
Rescher Nicholas (1988). Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Resnik Michael D. (1987). Choices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Russell J. S. (2004). Taking umpiring seriously: How philosophy can help umpires make the right calls in Baseball and Philosophy, ed. Bronson Eric. Chicago: Open Court (pp. 87103).
Sorensen Roy A. (1988). Blindspots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tversky Amos & Kahneman Daniel (1982). Evidential impact of base rates in Judgment Under Uncertainty, eds. Kahneman Daniel, Slovic Paul, & Tversky Amos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 153–60).
van Fraassen Bas (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warnken Byron & Samuels Elizabeth (1997). The types of opinions issued http://academic.udayton.edu/legaled/online/class/case08.htm.
Wittgenstein Ludwig (1976). Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics. ed. Diamond Cora. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester.
Zagzebski Linda (2003). The search for the source of epistemic good. Metaphilosophy 34:1228.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 9 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 75 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.